EXCLUSIVE: JUSTICE DEP'T REPLIES TO CONGRESS
ON NSA SPYING; REFUSES TO DEFINE TERRORIST; SAYS DOCTOR-PATIENT CALLS COULD BE TAPPED
Justice Department responds to House questions on NSA wiretapping program
RAW STORY
Published: Friday March 24, 2006
The US Justice Department has responded to questions from Republican and Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee on President Bush's warantless wiretapping of international calls, releasing their responses quietly on a Friday afternoon.
The Justice Department's responses were provided to RAW STORY late Friday by Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee. They were approved by Assistant Attorney General William Moschella under the aegis of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
At their core, the responses echo previous assessments by the Bush Justice Department which maintain that the eavesdropping program was legal and met the demands of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
"The FISA court of review discussed the President's inherent authority to conduct warrantless electronic surveillance in 2002, twenty-four years after FISA was enacted," the authors write.
The responses provide little new information about the program. The Attorney General refused to disclose how many Americans were spied upon, and declined to provide specifics on how "terrorists" are defined. Critics of the program say it is ripe for abuse and violates federal law.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Justice_Department_responds_to_House_questions_0324.htmlReponse to GOP questions
http://rawprint.com/pdfs/HJCrawstory1.pdfResponse to Democratic questions
http://rawprint.com/pdfs/HJCrawstory2.pdf