Christopher Hitchens said there were unfound WMDs in Iraq

[Proud2BAmurkin]

The gin soaked popinjay said it on Hardball. Said Little Lord Pissypants didn't lie about WMDs because they were in Iraq but Saddam must have got rid of them.

:rofl:

[graywarrior]

1. They're saving him a seat in AA

[ThoughtCriminal]

2. Along with the unicorns

but I can't prove it.

[JeffR]

3. In the shape of pink elephants

:eyes:

[smoogatz]

4. Of course there were.

And lots and lots of ponies!

[mdmc]

5. the USA sold wmd to saddam, and he used them, so he did have

them at one time. We knew that 95% of them were destroyed. We were unsure about 5%. Bush used this 5% as justification (in post 9-11-01, we need 100% certainty).

[ken_g]

6. BRILLIANT! - not. Poor man, he doesn't even know that he's

incoherent anymore. Sad, really.

[pinto]

7. The Bombay connection...

I (almost) see it all now.

[AlCzervik]

8. yes, saddam probably used his big purse to smuggle them out, just like

the big purse i use when i go to the movies to smuggle in my own snacks.

[radio4progressives]

9. i know i heard that... totally fvcking histerical. eom

:rofl:

[Solly Mack]

10. Rummy has known unknown knowns and Hissy has found unfound

WMD

wonder what the weather is like in their world?

[Dudley_DUright]

11. Apparently in Hitchen's case the DT's

include elaborate geopolitical delusions.

[beam me up scottie]

12. How ridiculous. Now if Charlie Sheen had said it...

that'd be different.

[Name removed]

16. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[beam me up scottie]

18. Not really.

MIHOP is just another cult full of superstitious believers.

[Name removed]

21. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[beam me up scottie]

25. Yes yes, the skeptics are evil for questioning MIHOP's bad science.

I know all about it. :nopity:

[bpilgrim]

26. not evil, a skeptic or scientific, just ignorant

thats why i gave you a link to that excellent documentary

peace

[beam me up scottie]

29. Yes and I converted immediately after watching it.

:rofl:

[bpilgrim]

30. you aren't alone...

psst... pass the word ;->

peace

[beam me up scottie]

32. Yes, I have all the scientologists for company.

They're happy to throw science out the window too, along with reason and logic, for a religious belief.

[bpilgrim]

33. ah, that explains it...

i was wondering why you had such a hard time with the truth.

just remember that snarky one liners make a poor substitute for a lamp post or a foundation to hold up the official story.


peace

[beam me up scottie]

34. Right, I'll tell that to anyone who believes the official story.

And I'll point them to your propaganda as the other end of the spectrum.

Two completely ridiculous and obviously flawed theories, each with their own set of believers.

Good thing the skeptics are in between you guys.

[bpilgrim]

35. make sure to pass on this scholarly study as well (LINK)

THE NEW PEARL HARBOR
Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11
by David Ray Griffin
foreword by Richard Folk

A must-read for all who want to get past the conspiracy of silence and mystification that surrounds 911.

read online here...
http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2004/06/141355.php

thank gore he 'invented' the INTERNETs :bounce:

peace

[beam me up scottie]

36. Scholarly? That bushbot? Why not just send them to freeperville?

It's a shortcut to the mindset of paranoid whackos, less time consuming.

They work for the right.

[bpilgrim]

38. flinging BS doesn't dispute the facts

fyi

peace

[CJCRANE]

40. How is Griffin a bushbot?

That's real upside-down talk.

[salvorhardin]

17. ROFL!

Maybe we can get Richard Verrall to tell us the TRUTH
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Verrall

[beam me up scottie]

19. Ah, another truth teller.

Good comparison, lots of people listened to him too, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.

[Beaverhausen]

13. Why wouldn't Saddam use the weapons if he had them?

I mean, I don't see the logic in developing weapons then hiding/moving them when you are attacked. Is it just me? :crazy:

[KharmaTrain]

31. Shhhhh...That's Way Too Logical

The fun I have with the asshat and wingnuts on this issue. Now, supposedly Saddam had these weapons and he wasn't afraid to use them on his people, no? Well if he wasn't afraid to gas Kurds (who weren't he people) why wouldn't he use them on troops hellbent on not only driving him from power, but killing him. What kind of a ruthless dictator is he?

And if he's hiding them somewhere else...then what's he waiting for? To re-invade? Summer re-runs? To put with the planes he sent to Iran in 1990 and they never came back?

The wingnuts need this argument in any form they can hang on to as it's the last minute thread of credibility they have to themselves. They'll never admit this war was a fraud cause it means they have been had and are frauds as well.

[SalmonChantedEvening]

14. Note to gin reservoir...

If he got rid of them, then HE DOESN'T FUCKING HAVE THEM ANYMORE!!!

Is this the best they can spew now? Good.

[BlueStorm]

15. My mom believes that the WMDs are in another country..

we just haven't found them yet.

I don't believe her as she is still kinda supportive of Bush.

Blue

[rusty charly]

20. i'm running into this

"the weapons were moved to syria" everywhere suddenly...

[BlueStorm]

24. That's what my mom says!!!

And she has been saying that since the war started...

Egads... does this mean that Bush is eyeing Syria?

Blue

[CJCRANE]

41. Possibly

but could also be just a RW talking point to keep * supporters happy and convinced that there were/are WMD.

[BlueStorm]

43. So it could be...

I wouldn't be surprised if he did start talking about Syria, heck he's got his eyes on Iran. But I bet if he did go to war or tried to go to war with either country, the American people won't put up with it.

Blue

[mzmolly]

22. Who cares? This was not about the WMD's Reagan gave Saddam.

it was about Nukes in the hands of Al Qaida. Remember that. :hi:

[DemoTex]

23. JimJam jive. DT rants.

Likker-talk, for sure.

[Generator]

27. That dude is crazy

Seriously he RESERVES his venom for Clinton, Lady Di and Sister Teresa. Sure I get some of his "ideas" on all of them. But his defending Bush on this makes him look like a loon-because he's really just defending his own position. AND he's suing the Bush admin over spying in conjuction with the ACLU-the article is pretty good in the latest Vanity Fair. He's smart enough to see the real danger the Bush cabal poses and yet he defends this rot.

[SoCalDem]

28. They just WON'T give it up, will they??

Every time they are within earshot of a microphone, they just cannot stop themselves from regurgitatin the myth..

[ladjf]

37. I'd like to know what kind of intelligence organization he has

at his disposal. No one else knows anything about the weapons. Sounds fictional to me.

[Peter Frank]

39. I'm sure that Saddam got rid of weapons...

...once he knew that Bush was serious about going in.

Bush's fuckup was in actually going in. He'd already won.

PNAC chose its stooge well.

[bpilgrim]

42. oh, he acquired WMDs only to get rid of them when he actually needed them

and did you see the military reports out this week that say documents and interviews show that saddam NEVER THOUGHT bush would invade?

fyi

peace

[WoodrowFan]

44. I confess

they're in the shed in my backyard. They are great keeping the dandelions down!