Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time to Stall a Bush Nominee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 11:44 AM
Original message
Time to Stall a Bush Nominee
Do you want THIS man making your reproductive decisions for you?





We don't generally approve of holding nominations hostage to other political objectives. But Senators Hillary Clinton and Patty Murray surely have good cause to block a vote on the nomination of Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach to become commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration until the agency makes a final decision on the morning-after pill. There is no excuse for the administration's endless obfuscation and delays on making the pill available without a prescription when the overwhelming bulk of expert opinion says it is safe to do so. The pill must be taken within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse, preferably within 24 hours, leaving little time to visit a doctor to get a prescription.

The two senators, both Democrats, have good reason to feel betrayed. When they threatened last year to hold up the confirmation of a previous commissioner until a decision on the pill was made, they ultimately relented because of a written assurance from Michael Leavitt, the secretary of health and human services, who said the F.D.A. would act on the issue by Sept. 1. Sadly, Mr. Leavitt was misinformed by the agency, overruled by the White House or deliberately deceptive with the senators. The only action the agency took in September was to defer a decision indefinitely.

The case for approving the use of the pill without a prescription has become even stronger in recent months. Evidence has emerged that high officials at the agency overruled their professional staff and ignored expert advisory committees when they rejected the application. Moreover, the agency's claim that it needed more time to consider "novel" issues raised by a proposal to require prescriptions for young teenagers was belied by internal documents revealing that the issues had been discussed for some time but not analyzed aggressively. The logical inference is that the result was dictated by politics — by a desire to placate religious and social conservatives who consider the pill an invitation to promiscuity and an abortifacient.

Should this nomination ultimately go forward, senators will still need to assess the qualifications of Dr. von Eschenbach, who has been acting commissioner since last September. He is a respected surgeon and was president-elect of the American Cancer Society. But his record as director of the National Cancer Institute, a post he holds even as he runs the F.D.A., gets mixed reviews.

cont'd...

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/25/opinion/25sat1.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just his last name alone makes me cringe!
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 11:47 AM by hippiechick
Ok, I admit it could be mental residue from seeing 'V' yesterday ... but "von Eschenbach" ... in charge of the FDA ? Medical trials and tests and all that ?

:scared: Why does the image of Mengele keep flashing before my eyes ? :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Insane, isn't it?
This is one nominee that needs to be blocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know much about him but he looks like a thug playing dress up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. He looks like Donald Trump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. With better hair.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC