Restraining Order against Bush/Cheney by Att'y Doug Wallace in Reno, NV

[Whoa_Nelly]

Doug Wallace is a retired attorney in Reno, NV. In January 2006 he filed a lawsuit against BushCo for the illegal war and the lies used to start it.

Now Doug has filed a restraining order against Bush, Cheney and the PNAC!

Although this isn't up on his site yet http://foundersfreedomdefensefund.blogspot.com/ I received a copy of this restraining order from Doug in my email this morning.
(If you go to his site, you can read about the lawsuit Jan. filing in the third article on that page. Also, take a minute to check out more about Doug Wallace by clicking on the link at top in right frame.)

Here's the restraining order

Douglas A. Wallace, Plaintiff pro se
Mail: P.O. Box 60958 Reno, NV 89432
Service: 550 E. Plumb Lane Ste.104 Reno, NV
Voice mail:l 775.833.5010
Cell: 775.813.3693
Email: [e-mail]






IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA


DOUGLAS A. WALLACE pro se )
for himself and others similarly situated, )
PLAINTIFF, )
)
VS. )
)
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, current ) NO C V –N-0025-HDM-VPC President of the United States and )
Elected Designee for office of the )
President of the United States for the term )
beginning January 20, 2005 )
) MOTION FOR
and ) TEMPORARY
) RESTRAINING ORDER
RICHARD B. CHENEY, current )
Vice President of the United States and )
Elected Designee for office of Vice President )
of the United States for the term )
beginning January 20, 2005 )
)
and )
)
JOHN DOES 1-100, )
Defendants. )
____________________________________ )


Plaintiff moves the court under FRCivP 65 (B) for a Temporary Restraining Order

against the defendants restraining them from further pursuit of their agenda of secret

implementation of a private treaty among Signatories of the Project for the New

American Century specifically outlined in a document known as “Rebuilding


MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER-1
America’s Defenses” (RAD) by which they have defrauded the Congress

and the American public in attacking Iraq, a sovereign nation, under the pretext of a “war

on Terrorism” and by which they are currently ramping up a cause for unjustified

violence against the sovereign nation of Iran. The restraining order sought is to restrain

Defendants from preemptively initiating any further acts of violence against Iran or any

Other member nation of the international community pending hearing on a motion for

preliminary Injunction filed concurrently herewith.


The need for a Temporary Restraining Order is demonstrated:

1. By the well known fact that the war with Iraq was instituted by deception

upon the part of the Defendants to obtain support of the Congress and the

American people to find and destroy Weapons of Mass Destruction when, as

history shows, no such threat existed which was known by intelligence agencies.


2. By rhetoric currently espoused by the Defendants that, “All options are on the

table” in demanding Iran discontinue it’s legitimate right to develop a nuclear

energy policy and building fear in the American public that imminent danger is

present when in fact no danger currently exists.


3. By a recent announcement by Valdimir Zhirinovsky, a Russian member of

parliament that he has information that the Defendants or their surrogates intend

to militarily strike Iran on March 28th.


4. By the fact that ex-president Gerald Ford and members of his administration

endorsed Iranian plans between 1974 and 1977 to build a nuclear Industry.

Among those members of the Ford administration at the time was Defendant

Cheney who now is threatening violence against Iran unless it desists from a


MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAING ORDER-2

program he was a participant in initiating. Other members of the Ford

administration promoting Iranian nuclear development were present Defense

Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld who also is now declaring all “options are on the

table” in threatening Iran together with Paul Wolfowitz formerly a Cheney

assistant and now President of the World Bank.


5. The Guide policy book published and used by the Defendants known as

the National Security Strategy published in 2002 contained the principle of

pre-emptive military attack against perceived enemies. The language used

appears to have been taken from RAD. That principle violates both the

Constitution and international law. The same policy of preemptive attack was

again published this past week in the 2006 edition of the same publication and

feigns Iran to be the foremost present threat to America when in fact it is no

military threat at all.
.

6. By the fact that establishing an illegal right of preemptive attack against

perceived enemies by the Defendants has established a dangerous precedent

as demonstrated by North Korea’s recent declaration that the US does not have a

monopoly on preemptive attack.


7. Plaintiff and his class have a basic right to not be subjected to unwarranted

consequences of continued unlawful conduct of Defendants affecting civil rights.

Unless the Defendants are immediately restrained from further pursuit of their

Private treaty under RAD to militarily dominate and intimidate the world, using

any necessary “shaping of circumstances” ( a statement in RAD) by which they

bait the public and then switch to other justifications for violence as in the case


MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAING ORDER-3

of Iraq. Purposely done for advancing implementation of the goals of RAD.

Defendant’s current conduct in ramping up fear in Americans to justify an attack

On Iran poses a prospect of an immediate and irreparable injury to the rights of

Plaintiff and members of his class for which money damages are inadequate.


Since no injury can be contemplated to Defendants by restraining them from violating

the Constitution which they have sworn to defend and protect, a waiver of posting

any surety for purposes of restitution should be made or in the alternative, a minimal

symbolic compliance with FRCiv P 65 should not exceed Fifty (50.00) Dollars.


Plaintiff requests a date and time for consideration of a Temporary Restraining Order to

hold the status quo until a hearing can be held on the motion for Preliminary Injunction.


Respectfully submitted this 24th Day of March 2006


________________________________
Douglas A. Wallace Plaintiff pro se






















MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER-4

[mdmc]

1. what does it all mean?

[Whoa_Nelly]

3. Doug is pissed

He has worked very hard for over two years to build his website and gather donations all to be able to legally file against BushCo.

I personally think he's one very great American.

[napi21]

6. Not sure. It's a well worded document though. I suspect it will be

dismissed, similarl to swatting a fly, but it's an interesting concept.

[bridgit]

2. i wish him all the luck, but cheney & bush don't respect the law...

x( or it's process unless it serves their ends and their ends alone

[Whoa_Nelly]

5. At least , as an attorney, Doug is trying to do the right thing

and all he can through the limit of law, and his right to exercise his freedoms as an American.

Have been in contact with Doug in the past, and posted his latest court filing in support of him.

Who knows? If there are media people who check into DU, maybe Doug's fight will get more media coverage.

[bridgit]

9. sure i'm hearing you, there is a preponderance of evidence against...

them, of that there can be no doubt; here's waiting for a judge with the balls to do the right thing :thumbsup:

[EST]

4. Way f*****g cool!

Wonder if a thousand of these could keep Abu Gonzo tied up enough to keep him out of mischief?

[donsu]

7. "restraining order" what sweet words

first I've heard them used for the bushmilhousegang

I'll second a restraining order

[Tsiyu]

8. Doug Wallace is a true patriot

:patriot:

Maybe pissing in the wind, but if it's the right kind of wind....