Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm watching the movie Brazil (1985)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:45 PM
Original message
I'm watching the movie Brazil (1985)
I just caught it halfway through. "A man rebels against the system in a totalitarian society." I think DU would like this movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a great film. In fact, more relevant than 1984.
Some people believe we are destined to become the Orwellian world of 1984, but I disagree. I believe that we are starting to live in the world of Brazil and it's a far more realistic treatment of what society can easily become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I really think it's my favorite movie.
Just everything about it is at once funny and scary.

Like the phone in his house - the one with all the wires coming out? Technology is supposed to make things simpler, and yet it often does just the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great film n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great one...
Hope you are watching it commercial-free...because of it's odd length, TV cuts out bits that they figure are irrlevent...Gilliam tends to put a lot into his movies...

That one is chock a block full of semoitics...like 13 monkeys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. yo! 13 monkeys gave me nightmares for a long time
This is the same director?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Oops...
LOL nawh he didn't direct that one...he directed one called 12 monkeys...LOL...

Me use brain and type goodly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. with Bruce Willis right?
That was the movie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Yeah...
I dunno why I always think it's called 13 monkeys...probably because 13 has a connotation with 'freaky' which is what that movie was...Brad Pitt was funny as a crazy guy...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. yup
good times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. I still haven't gotten over Fisher King
I could only watch it once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. that psychology stuff got to you?
I don't remember the movie ... just robin williams and some guy lying naked in central park... homelessness...
Please refresh my memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. The restaurant scene where Robin's wife is massacred (along with a lot of
others) and the horseman in his nightmares who looks like a giant splatter of blood.
{{shudder}}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
80. thanks for the memory
tough stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
51. TV edits are far worse than that actually
I believe they use the "love conquers all" version, that ends with Sam living happily ever after in the country with Julia. It was edited by a person who understood nothing about the film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chatterboy Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. One of the greatest movies ...
... ever. And yes, we are living it:

JILL
Who is this war against, Sam?

SAM
Well, terrorists of course.

JILL
How many terrorists have you met? Actual terrorists?

SAM
Actual terrorists? Well ... it's only my first day.

http://chatterbyrondavis.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. lol
I just watched that scene!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
50. Classic!
And there are dozens more in that movie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Saw this movie in Palo Alto California. Outstanding!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeachyDem88 Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. *jealousy*
lol... i always wanted to see it...

our local blockbuster didn't have it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I never heard of it before. I only got to see the last half
I watched the end of Ferris Bulers Day Off before switching over. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Here's your receipt for your husband..."
"...and here's my receipt for your receipt."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Could you fix my air conditioning?
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Only if I don't have to fill out a 27B/6 form first

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I need to rent this one...
Haven't seenit in about 15 years, DeNiro is great!

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Fantastic film! (Small spoiler here.)
However, as in 1984, the system does win in the end ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. the movie just ended
At first I thought that the combine lost. I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. Saw this movie in 1985 with someone who had never heard of '1984'
which added to the surreal feeling of the movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. Did you know, though, that . . .
the film company DEMANDED that Gilliam rework the ending to give it a happy ending?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #44
59. Yes. He was furious. It was a huge stink.
Full-page adverts in Variety slandering the studios, as I remember. Gilliam didn't take much shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. I remember now - a lot was on his DVD "extras".
I think that's the first time I've watched a whole movie with commentary. It was fascinating. They wanted him to cut the movie right at the part just before the torture guy peeks over the glowing sunset and says, "Looks like we lost him." Can you imagine how utterly pointless the whole movie would have been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Yeah, and the studio refused to release the version he wanted.
For a long time, anyway, until he started trying to publicly discredit them. What a mess.

I'm pleased to see this thread. It's a film that deserves a wider audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. Especially the part in a totalitarian society where no "other example"
is allowed to exist. And Robert Deniro plays a "terrorist" who intercepts repair calls for major appliances and mechanical systems, sneaks in a repairs them efficiently. And for doing so is hunted down.

I would say that is the first sign of totalitarianism. Where examples of "other systems" or "other ways of thinking" have to be debased and stopped.

Reminds me of neocon desire to put a cork in the example of the "public good".

If pure capitalism is so good - it would show itself to be. It doesn't need "help" in the form of: mistakes, incompetence, mis-directed resources, etc. forced upon the systems it competes with.

This attempt to change perceptions (or control all perception in the case of totalitarianism) is marketing and marketing is not capitalism. In capitalism (the theory) the best idea wins on its own merits when the public is well informed.

I think the neocons should just own up to it all and say - "hey - we are not for unfettered capitalism, we are for unfettered marketing".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. i've always thought of marketing and capitalism as one in the same
an extension of one and other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
70. The basic assumption of Captialism according to Adam Smith et
al - is that given perfect information the markets will perform correctly and distribute things in an efficient way. Says nothing about equality - though getting the money out of the landed gentry and the churches was a huge part of capitalism's appeal in the 1700s. It opened up all sorts of jobs. Not just in factories. You could open your own business. You could buy some land (or immigrate and get some free land taken from somebody else). You could maybe get a loan. Buy a house. Go to school.

These days economics professors study what "information" means. And how it is skewed.

Marketing is just an adjunct to capitalism. But it seems to be the be all and end all of neocons. Funny - cause it was politics and special access to information that was how the church and gentry kept a hold of so much of the resources for such a long time. Before capitalism.

I think capitalism is just the economic side of the enlightenment. And if neocons say they hate the enlightenment - then they really mean they hate capitalism too.

Keep in mind that there never has been pure capitalism. That it is always a mixed market economy you are talking about when you talk about capitalist countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. what would make it a mixed market economy instead of pure?
What "mixes" it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. Any government spending. Any government spending at all. Any
charitiable spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. thanks for the explanation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. Bush chooses to spend on military and hegemony. Others would
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 08:34 PM by applegrove
choose to spend on kick=ass public schools or national health care.

Your military spending is like 50 times higher than the nearest country (or something). That isn't market. No one person in the USA would have the wearwithall or the money to buy a 30 million dollar jet. No market.

mixed market economy

http://www.cssd.ab.ca/tech/social/tut9/lesson_25.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. Regulations too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. yup
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. De Niro's character makes me think about something I heard about Iraq
when a US military spokesman said they identified a insurgent stronghold because they had working elecricity 24/7 and a water supply so couldn't possibly be under control of the Iraqi government. The rationale was the bad guys were sabotaging the power lines - ergo they must be terrorists !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #43
68. That makes perfect sense. People who blow up power lines are
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 10:09 PM by applegrove
not good. Keep in mind the pile of dead Iraqi civilians. They are the innocent ones. Those creeps in the insurgency don't want democracy. As bad as the invasion was handled - the US are not the most evil thing in Iraq. The terrorists who kill civilians are. Rummy's crime is that he liked war so much he saw no need for a short one - and put in too few resources. Bush crime is that he had Saddam Hussein willing to sign up for retirement somewhere or elections. And Bush chose war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. i wacthed that this morning too - love it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skarbrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. I've had the song "Brazil, Brazil" running through my head since 2001.

Actually, since after 9/11. I would put "Brazil, Brazil" at the end of my posts every now and then and no one ever commented. :)

Yes, it's a great but sad movie. The ending always gives me goose bumps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
45. For some reason, I like their version of "Brazil" better . . .
. . . than any other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. The torture scene is hideously funny. Eerily prescient.
Only Cleese (or is it Palin?, it's been several years) could pull that off and still make it humorous.

The concept of routine torture in a western country seemed so other-worldly in 1985. Today, it's all too familiar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
47. It's Palin in the one scene . . .
. . . where he's out in the waiting room and the secretary is transcribing ("AAAAAGGGHH, NO, NO, NO MORE PLEASE, SCREEEAAMM").

I think it's also Palin in the final scene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
52. No no no, not torure!
It's "information retrieval". I wonder if that's what they call it at Abu Ghraib.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
69. I don't remember the torture scene. I just remember breaking out
into laughter when the Deniro character showed up to repair. The rest of it was mind-numbingly dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlsmith1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. V For Vendetta Reminded Me of Brazil
If you have seen V but not Brazil, you *have* to see Brazil! Terry Gilliam is one of my favorite directors. He is a genius!

Tammy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. Brazil is an amazing film
But now you're going to need to rent the dvd so you can see the 1st half. Also, it's well worth playing the commentary track so you can hear about how the studio tried to force Gilliam to make a very different film.
Thank goodness that he prevailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
48. Yes! It marks his first of many run ins with studio execs.
He still has one project shelved because of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
66. Do you mean "Don Quixote"?
And isn't it a supreme irony that film, of any, would be shelved?

Looks like he hasn't entirely given up though:

Gilliam plans Don Quixote revival

Director Terry Gilliam is planning to revive Don Quixote, which was set to be the biggest European film made but was shelved five days into filming.

"If we can get the film out of the hands of the lawyers, then that will be my next project," he said.

The $32m (£18m) movie was due to star Johnny Depp but was aborted in 2000 after financial problems and the poor health of lead actor Jean Rochefort.

Events behind the film were documented in the 2002 movie Lost in La Mancha.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4425970.stm


I hopes he gets it made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Yes, that's the one.
Johnny Depp, huh? That would be great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. In my top 10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Mine too
I remember the day I saw that movie back in the '80s, as the credits rolled on the final scene, I knew I'd had a life-changing experience.

A lot of people I know hate it with a passion, tho. Maybe they don't like movies that strike too close to home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
54. A lot of people just don't get it. (possible spoiler!)
It's a lot to wrap your brain around. Toward the end the movie becomes Sam's mental-defense fantasy (see also the short story "An Occurence at Owl Creek Bridge" and Scorsese's "Last Temtation of Christ"), and it took me a couple viewings to fully understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. I just got the dvd and my son stole it from me! BTW mdmc
I just saw your journal and a pic of the Woody Guthrie Memorial Concert. Did you go? I had the privilege of being there! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. no WAY!
I've seen Pete and Woody together in Carnagie in 98. I was born in 71.

That is so cool that you were there!:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Way! PS...
I hope that you mean Arlo and Pete! Woody died before you were born. :-( Although in my belief system I wouldn't be surprised if Woody's spirit was right there with them.

Yes, it was very cool! I was 16 at the time and went with a couple of my friends. I lived in Queens then. I must say that it was one of the best concerts I had ever attended. The music and presentation were sublime. Will Geer (aka Grandpa Walton)and Robert Ryan played hosts. I believe it was during the intermission that as I was going down a corridor I ran into Tom Paxton and asked him if I could give him a kiss and he didn't turn me down. :-)

I also saw Arlo's first Thanksgiving concert at Carnegie Hall and have seen him a couple of times after that. Living where I do, I have seen/heard Pete many often, vendored at his boat club's festival a few times,where I had the privilege of meeting him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
57. I did mean Arlo
the magical hudson valley...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
35. one of my favorites
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. Excellent movie when it first came out, and highly relevant today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
39. Yes, excellent movie. I'd also recommend "They Live".
I'm all out of bubblegum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
40. One of my all-time favorite movies ... Terry Gilliam roolz!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
41. Excellent film. I had a private screening of that back in 85....
Which is to say, I went to an afternoon showing and was the only
person in the theater.

One of my all-time favorite films, but it turns out
that actually LIVING it in 2006 kinda sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. Ha! Good point.
Watching it on the silver screen always seems better than the real thing.

Is that irony or just sarcasm? Can't decide which smilie to use.

How about just disgusted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
42. piping in
I Must give love to one of the finest films ever made:

Sam Lowry: My name's Lowry. Sam Lowry. I've been told to report to Mr. Warrenn.

Porter - Information Retrieval: Thirtieth floor, sir. You're expected.

Sam Lowry: Um... don't you want to search me?

Porter - Information Retrieval: No sir.

Sam Lowry: Do you want to see my ID?

Porter - Information Retrieval: No need, sir.

Sam Lowry: But I could be anybody.

Porter - Information Retrieval: No you couldn't sir. This is Information Retrieval.


http://imdb.com/title/tt0088846/quotes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
46. I TiVo'ed
can't wait!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
53. "Remember, we're all in this together!"
Some of the best and most panoramic visuals I've ever seen in a movie. He uses depth and dimension so well, and the story is still quite relevant 21 years later. GROSSLY overlooked movie. Murka needs to get smarter and realize not every movie has to be ironically gore-soaked or pompously and unrealistically wordy to be a classic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. There's a democratic campaign slogan for you!
Gilliam is a genius, and it's never been more apparent than in this film. 12 Monkeys was great, as was Baron Munchaussen, Fear and Loathing, Time Bandits and the Python films, but Brazil remains his masterpiece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
55. Honestly, this is the first time I've connected Brazil with today
It's been one of my favorites for so long (and I haven't seen it in a long time), so the obvious connection to modern-day America didn't occur to me until I read this thread. But yeah, it completely fits, doesn't it? It seemed so over-the-top in 1985. Things like that could never happen here!

Now the thought of calling torture "Information Retrieval" (and billing the victim's family for it) seems all too plausible.

And how far is "bad sportsmanship" from "they hate our freedom"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. I'm willing to watch it again.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
60. Are there blacks in "Brazil", too?
Incompetent minds want to know. Bush** wants to know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
61. I just Tivoed that
I remember a coworker telling me it was his favorite movie years ago, but I've never seen it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
63. I bought a DVD ...
..... of the 142 minute version a week or two ago (after another thread here about it). I saw it when it came out, but I don't remember that much of it.

I'm looking forward to watching it, maybe tomorrow :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
64. I caught it just in time to tivo
I want to watch it when the house empties out a bit, so I can enjoy it without interruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. I only caught the last half
It reminded me of Catch 22.:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
73. We're all in this together!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
78. You may recognize my avatar, then.
"How many terrorists have you met, Sam... Actual terrorists?"

"um... actual terrorists?
Well, it's only my first day"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. too cool
for school
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drbtg1 Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
82. Please note there are two DVD versions
The first was released by Universal with a runtime of 131 minutes.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0783225903/qid=1143468227/sr=8-2/ref=pd_bbs_2/103-7504413-8315856?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance&n=130

However, the superior version was a three disc set that was released by the Criterion Collection. It has the 142 minute director's cut w/ Gilliam's commentary, the aforementioned "Love Conquers All" edited version with a separate commentary, a documentary narrated by Jack Matthews (the author of "The Battle for Brazil"), and tons more extras.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0780022181/qid=1143468227/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-7504413-8315856?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance&n=130

I'd strongly recommend the Criterion version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
83. It's a hideous movie that made me feel ill for days.

And it's all coming true.

At the time (you will know this line from wathing the movie) it seemed satirical to make jokes about "plastic surgery gift vouchers", these days YOU CAN ACTUALLY GET THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC