Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak: Abramoff Clearing DeLay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 12:59 PM
Original message
Novak: Abramoff Clearing DeLay

Abramoff clearing DeLay

Mar 25, 2006
by Robert Novak ( bio | archive )


WASHINGTON -- Disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff has advised friends that he has no derogatory information about former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and is not implicating him as part of his plea bargain with federal prosecutors.

Abramoff's guilty plea on fraud, tax evasion and conspiracy charges requires him to provide evidence about members of Congress. That led to speculation that this would mean trouble for DeLay, who faces money laundering and conspiracy charges in Texas.

However, Abramoff has not given a clean bill of health to any other congressman -- including Rep. Robert Ney, who has stepped down as chairman of the House Administration Committee. Ney was the only member of Congress named in court papers connected with Abramoff's guilty plea Jan. 4.

http://townhall.com/opinion/columns/robertnovak/2006/03/25/191300.html
(it's a RW site, but there is more of the column there)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Not additionally implicating" does not equal "clearing"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh, Mr. Novak ...
"Abramoff has advised friends that he has no derogatory information about former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay ..."

That is not quite the same thing as 'clearing' Tom DeLay, now is it?

Oooops! My bad. For a second there, I thought I was addressing an actual journalist, who would care about such things.

Silly me!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, well Jack didn't think stealing money from Indians
was wrong, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did DeLay take the golfing trip?
Did Abramoff pay for it?

Nothing derogatory about that.

Does this mean they aren't ASKING Abramoff about DeLay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicofaraby Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Sounds familiar
"Does this mean they aren't ASKING Abramoff about DeLay?"

Just like Watergate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bob Novak is
one big pile of steaming shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm more inclined to think a cold pile myself
treasonous come to mind too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. So, Abramoff is now judge and jury? What's with the headlines?
RawStory has the same headline:
Novak: 'Abramoff clearing DeLay'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks, Mr. Credibility! Talked to Fitz lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyuzoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. So Abramoff gets to decide who's guilty.
Strange, all along I thought it was the jury who did that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Douche Bag of Liberty Speaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC