Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Excellent letter and editorial. The letter brings up PNAC and

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:05 PM
Original message
Excellent letter and editorial. The letter brings up PNAC and
the editorial brings up church state issues.

Read the last letter on the page.
http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/editorial/14183672.htm


Though this editorial is specific to Kentucky, it should resonate nationwide. In 2004 Dr Daniel Mongiardo ran against Jim Bunning. He did pretty good, but the whisper campaigns that Dr Dan was gay (he's not) or because his skin was a shade darker that he was a terrorist (he's a rural doctor) swayed the "conservative" voters to vote for Bunning. Dr Dan did good in moderate parts of the state, but the specter of having a "gay terrorist" in the Senate was too much for the easily deceived and Bunning pulled out a victory.

http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/editorial/14183671.htm

KENTUCKY VOICES
Beware of politicians using religion to push other issues
By Daniel Mongiardo
Over the past several years, one political party has deceived the public by exploiting religion. For example, we have been duped into looking at separation of church and state from the wrong perspective.

Separating church and state should not mean keeping God out of government. Instead, we should be worrying about keeping the corrupting influence of politicians out of religion. Indeed, that was what most concerned our nation's founders.
Our country was built on fundamental Christian values. That is why I supported and voted for House Bill 277, which would allow the Ten Commandments to be posted in schools and other public buildings.

What concerned our forefathers was protecting religion from the interference of state. Indeed, warnings about the dangers of political corruption of religion stretch back through the ages.

more at link.


BTW, Dr Dan was one of the many campaigns I helped in 2004. Though he is a bit conservative for my tastes, I liked the guy and liked his honesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Load of crap...
The founding fathers wanted to keep both separate from one another. Unlike modern Americans, they were WELL aware of what happened in Europe as a result of religion and politics becoming too closely aligned with one another. It's bad for the political process and religion alike. And sure as hell bad for the people.

Anyone who natters on about the whole "founded on the Christian religion" crap is fouling the water and making things worse, even if that person IS for the separation of church and state on principle. We were founded as a secular republic made up of several colonies representing several different Christian sects who wanted NO particular sect to have more authority than the others. The only way to accomplish this was to make certain that no religious language was included in our founding documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. As always, MythSage ...
... well said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks, Nance...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for the link!
BRILLIANT stuff, Mythsaje! Posted over there, and gave it a big kick and Recommend!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks...I posted it late last night
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 01:58 PM by Mythsaje
and it doesn't look as though it's going to get five recs. :shrug: I'll probably re-post sometime next week. With my change in schedule people who know me and my writing aren't around when I post anymore. :)

On edit...of course, I could be wrong. LOL It got five.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Here's my latest rant ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You always need to know your audience. He said what he said
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 04:33 PM by alfredo
to keep from turning off the readers before he made his case. Nothing we can say can change their belief that this is a Christian nation, so he has to work within that belief to reframe the debate. So don't discount the message by that nod to the sensibilities of his target audience.

He wants to let them know the Republicans are using religion to manipulate them, and if they don't pay attention they will lose their freedom.

forgot to add:

I spent 14 years in retail and I learned that to effectively sale a product you must first sell yourself. If your customer doesn't like you, or doesn't trust you, you are not going to get that commission. So by getting the customer on your side you you stand a much better chance to make that sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC