Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

if we really want to do something effective about illegal immigration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:20 PM
Original message
if we really want to do something effective about illegal immigration
(and I'm not at all sure that we do), why not do something to genuinely help the economies south of our borders and thus remove the incentive for folks to leave their home and come north?

I'm no economist, but I have a hard time believing that, were there the will, we couldn't do something other than exporting American jobs to assist our neighbors to the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's what Clinton was trying to do with NAFTA
but I guess it wasn't enough. I can remember 10 years ago telling my pro labor anti NAFTA friends that it was about preventing the exact problem we are here discussing today.

Hey Ulysses, how ya doin? We start testing Monday. Yippee!! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. NAFTA is a problem in and of itself.
Doing fine here - we don't start until the third week in April, so we're still in the middle of the mad dash of cramming, test taking skills, etc. I hate this time of year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I don't know what to think about NAFTA anymore.
I understood what Clinton wanted and supported him. And I was a union leader at the time. LOL I guess it wasn't comprehensive enough. Or maybe he was too busy with Monicagate to get it right.

I have already decided to put 3 of my kids on the alternate assessment next year. They are all MR and they are going to bomb on the state tests. Our district was notified by the state that we haven't met the minimum # for exempted kids. So I am going for the alternate. Do you have any kids on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. we have a large SID/PID and MoID population
so there's no room on the GAA list. All my MID kids take the standard test. It's fun.

I have a different view of what Clinton wanted with NAFTA - it's part of the reason he's been on my shit list for years. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. He sure lost me too, such a disappointment
What's SID/PID and Mo/ID? All these mnemonics - LOL

My district practically made it a capital offense to exempt kids. So now we have all these really low functioning kids taking grade level tests.

Here's a funny test story. The district had a big meeting with instructional coaches last week giving out last minute directives on testing. My good friend was leading the meeting. She said one of the coaches raised her hand and asked "Is it true we have to test kids who are no longer enrolled in our school?" My friend replied (with the straightest face she could muster) "Yes, you need to go to Mexico and find every one of them".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. severe/profound/moderate intellectual disabilities
MID - mild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. In MO,
they call them all MR - mentally retarded. Ain't that nice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. GA is more PC than Missouri?
Of course, we still call the certification MR...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. NAFTA is John Negroponte's Brain Child Project, He Wrote the Agreement
Just found that out about a month ago, when he was on C-Span touting his horn on the story. He tried without success in getting Poppy Bush to push it through Congress - then when Clinton came into office, even though Clinton campaigned against NAFTA before he got elected, once he got elected, something happened and Negroponte got Clinton to push it through.

Now, Negroponte is Director of Central Intelligence...

ain't that special?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Barrett Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. And We Got Screwed
Clinton screwed us royally on that and I for one will never forget it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. NAFTA made it worse.
Corn (maize) originated in Mexico; and there are therefore many native variants. But due to NAFTA, and U.S. subsidies for the growing of corn, U.S. corn producers have taken over the Mexican the corn market. Rural populations that could previously make a poor living producing and selling corn can no longer do so -- so there is more emigration from the countryside, to the cities, and to the States. Meanwhile, all of those factories that were settling in northern Mexico and were going to turn it into a big economic success -- many of those companies have moved production on to China for even lower wages than prevail in Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran1212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. Mexico is the same after NAFTA
Corporate reliance never helps except in the short term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now THERE's an intelligent and well-thought-out post.
All it would take would be the will, some inventive thinking, and a few billion bucks. Much less than we waste trying to keep people out (and not doing so) every year.

And those few billion bucks would surely flow back to us in a myriad of ways, goodwill not being the least of them.

I do hope that people here rise to the challenge of your post and come up with concrete examples of ways it could be done. Thanks for putting this conscept on the table.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. think of the billions we'd have
without the Iraq war. I guess my suggestion would be "nation building", though.

Thanks, Redstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Ya welcome. Think if we'd spent those billions not only doing what
you propose, but (for example) building factories in Palestine, so the Palestinians would have jobs and hope, instead of hopelessness and rage?

How many lives would we save?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. would that we had that America still.
:sigh: Maybe some day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. No, no, that's the wrong packaging:
we'd need to call it "trade building."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. First of all , there would be a need for an army to guard the money.
Could not turn it over to the Mexican Gov. as it would disappear. Mexican politics are notoriously corrupt.They are inhumane toward their people. They could not be trusted to handle anything.I know some fine Mexican people who support their families in Mexico by working here.Growing up in Calif, I could never understand why so many hated the hispanics.They are an important part of the fabric of our life, and are simply trying to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Economic aid without political reform just lines pockets of the rich
Latin America needs genuine revolutionary change, economic democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think there are signs of change
with recent elections in South America. I hope the wave of change continues and doesn't get sidetracked like it did in the 60s and 70s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. fair point, but I didn't necessarily just mean cash aid. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Well, here's one thing we can do right here:
buy our gas from CITGO. We not only help fund Chavez's reform efforts in Latin America; we also help fund his selling of heating oil at below-market prices to the poor of the Northeastern U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. IMHO we should support Bush's Guest Worker program
and then let the Repugs fight it out. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Sounds like a plan to me
They ARE in charge, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. And they have two groups at odds with themselves
IMHO this should be a Dem :popcorn: time. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Barrett Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. I Agree ... The Dems Should OPPOSE It
If the Party wants to gain traction politically, this is like manna from heaven. It would pull votes out of the GOP and the middle. It's a natural fit for that Democratic Party of old that your grandfather belonged to. Bush and the GOP Congress would be out in right field while the Democrats were running the bases and winning elections with a grand slam.

Do I expect Democratic leadership to capitalize on it...hell no, they're out in left field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think we should just annex Mexico, make it the 51st state. All
problems solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. damn! wish you were in charge before we went into iraq...
we could'e used a thinker like you then. oh well, there's still iran. why don't you dash a note off to *?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. Just quit worrying about it
give visas to people with jobs, know who is here and let it go at that.

If you could make big money in another country, I'm sure you'd see it as stupid if they wanted to let that prosperity go, JUST BECAUSE OF WHERE YOU WERE BORN.

It's all too stupid for words, especially in this country OF IMMIGRANTS!

What do you care if someone was born in Mexico? What skin is it off your nose if they work here?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. But, but, they broke the law to come here!!
They are ILLEGAL!! I am SERIES! This is hugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Barrett Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Hey...not my problem.
It might be too stupid for words for you, but I will surmise that you, as with the others who claim this a non-issue, that you're not in a $7/hr job that is competing with an illegal who will acept $4/hr.

Self-righteousness can be a virtue when it is based upon something that affects that individual.....but not when it concerns something that only affects someone else....like that American guy making $7/hr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Of Course, From The Lofty Perch Of A Tenured Teaching Position
a defined benefit/trust fund annuity, or college paid by the parents, the impact of the labor black market on the middle and lower class working people of this country seems to be, well, no problem at all.

The minute there is any discussion of tightening up immigration, a civil war revolving around accusations of racism breaks out, nothing gets done, and the Iron Heel (GOP Corporatists) laugh all the way to the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Barrett Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Well Said .....
I wish I could have said it as well. The hypocrisy reeks from those on the perch and it is sad.

As with our Senators and Congressmen and Bush....they need to a walk a mile in the shoes of those truly impacted with real stresses, loss of wages, and job insecurity instituted by this corporatism, supposed free trade, outsourcing and insourcing that some Democrats have apparently bought into lock stock and barrel.

When one has a secure job with all the perks of office, tenure, secure retirement with generous taxpayer paid perks and benefits it is easy to make claims of pious racism against those less fortunate who dislike seeing THEIR job lost to those from OTHER countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Great. And What About The Next 11 M, Then The Next 11 M
Then 11 M after that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
36. We could ban imports from China
and force Walmart to start buying products made in Mexico instead of China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
37. a sunday evening
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
39. We need to round up all of the greedy, bloodsuckers - the CEOs of the
huge corporations. You know, the ones who are making 425 times what the average workers are making and then taking ungodly amounts of money out of the corps. with their retirement packages, etc. These folks just loved NAFTA because the auto, furniture, and how many other industries could relocate into countries like Mexico, China, etc. where they can pollute to their blackhearts' desires. The workers work cheap and they can't complain much or they're beaten up, etc.

The same corporate greed that has us in Iraq.

I have a neighbor who has mentored 2 different families who came here from Nicaragua. They left because when the 'peasants' began to complain about conditions there family members would begin to disappear or turn up dead. Who stirred up the hornet's nest there?

Coca Cola is in how many Latin American countries? Columbia and how many others? When workers try to organize or the people rise up to raise hell about losing their natural resource (water) workers disappear or they turn up dead.

I'm a thinkin' we've got to do something about the 'greed is good' attitude and get some control over the greedy bloodsuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I think that's true.
Immigration doesn't exist in a vacuum. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC