Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dumbfounded by this right wing logic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
pimpbot Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:38 AM
Original message
Dumbfounded by this right wing logic
"innocent japs?????????

give me a break, and stop the kumbaya attitude!!


they (japan) attacked us, you win a war two ways, kill its military OR crush its peoples will to fight!

you libs hate us killing the insurgency in Iraq, you hated us winning so fast in BOTH gulf wars, so you are trying to defeat OUR troops HERE.
typical Jane Fonda moves!

bush is the pres for the next two years, we are in Iraq until we kill ALL the insurgents. we are not giving a time line, hell we didn't give Hitler or general lee one did we?

we are there until its over, end of story!!!"


This was posted in an off topic forum on a non-political site. It just boggled my mind what this dude is thinking. I'm not even sure if it would be worth a response. How do you attempt to even argue a point with people like this?

Ugh, makes me depressed thinking how many others probably feel the same as him. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. "we are in Iraq until we kill ALL the insurgents" - chuckle
Yeah, the Brits had a similar attitude towards us during the Revolutionary War. Guess who won?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. The "insurgency" are the people who were attacked by foreign invaders.
So, the argument this guy is making is that the Iraqi "insurgency" should "kill" the U.S. military. (No, he doesn't know it; he's stupid.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. First, you post a link so we know you're not spreading RW garbage
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 01:48 AM by wtmusic
here :eyes:

Then, once you have a link, you calmly explain to the moron that the Iraqi insurgency is a myth...they are the citizens of Iraq fighting an illegal occupation. You would have to slaughter all the people in Iraq, and since that's not going to happen, let's bring our soldiers home now, before one you know dies, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pimpbot Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. and thier use of stats is meaningless. Here:


.S. commander in charge of training cedes point on Iraq handover

By Lisa Burgess, Stars and Stripes
Mideast edition, Saturday, March 25, 2006

ARLINGTON, Va. — A national security expert “has a valid point” when he says that turning over large portions of battle space to Iraqi forces is meaningless if most of that land is desert, a top U.S. commander in Iraq said Friday.
Anthony Cordesman, a national security analyst with the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, believes the hand-over emphasis is “nonsense.”
With almost the entire western half of Iraq virtually empty desert, “the figures vastly overestimate the actual area of influence and are at least as meaningless as the worst reporting on pacification in Vietnam,” Cordesman wrote in a March 22 paper for CSIS.



http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?article=35994 §ion=104
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. It boggles my mind too
but just like a Repuke, she has to be racist as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'd respond because it's what I do...
"We did not WIN the 2nd Gulf War...toppling a government is NOT winning. It's easy to destroy. It's harder to build. If you think we can crush the insurgency by being more destructive than we already have been, you're dreaming. You're talking about an enemy that cannot be seen until it strikes, that has no purpose other than to kill. They're not trying to take territory. We have only once faced a enemy so implacable, and that enemy beat us.

It will never be over as long as we're there."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. The US killed the insurgency in Japan by killing its citizenry
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 02:12 AM by rocknation
which they wouldn't have been able to do without a weapon of mass destruction.

The U.S. lost Viet Nam--and are losing Iraq--because a) they can't tell the insurgents from the civilians anymore, and b) using a weapon of mass destruction would only underscore the failure of the mission to liberate them.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pimpbot Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Wow very good point
I'll have to remember that one. Most of the rednecks on that thread just laughed and said we shoulda droped a few more for kicks. Sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. who's general lee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Robert E., I suppose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. I'm generally lazy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. congrats on 1000 posts!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. Talk about ignorant!
you hated us winning so fast in BOTH gulf wars
We WON? I went out for awhile this evening. Was there a big announcement and I missed it? Darn

bush is the pres for the next two years
That would put him out of office more than 6 months before the next election, but hey, I'll take it!

we are in Iraq until we kill ALL the insurgents
Well at the rate we are killing Iraqis, that might not take too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. there's also evidence that...
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 02:13 AM by CanuckAmok
...the Japanese attacked the US because the US had blockaded Japan's petroleum route, in order to enable the Chinese to beat Japan on the war they were having (the Japanese did invade Manchuria). The US blockade was not authorised, of course, by the League of Nations.

Just sayin'.

And was there another Gulf War I didn't hear about? Because you sure aren't winning this one, "fast" or otherwise.

Here's what going to happen:

The US forces will be in Iraq beyond 2008. Once Bush is out of office and (probably) a Democrat is President, the corporate media will blame the new Prez for making a mess of the Iraq situation, and the sheeple like your friend there will eat it up. You just watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. there's nothing more dangerous...
Than a monkey in the depths of an ether binge. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. "Psychedelics are almost irrelevant in a town where...
...you can wander into a casino any time of the day or night and witness the crucifiction of a gorilla..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharman Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. Suggested response?
We're going to be there til Bush has drained our treasury, crushed our military and fattened Halliburton like a bloated leach
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. There's no arguing
That person is just stringing together a list of everything he hates & admirably trying to tie it all together into this issue. If someone answers him, he'll just do more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. Fucking Nut. And a dumb one, too. Give him this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. We didn't give Hitler or General Lee a timeline
Both were enemies of the USA. Funny who their heroes turn out to be isn't it? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
20. What the writer seems to forget is that Muslims are the........
....fastest growing religion in the world and if a "world wide jihad" is called we could be in a world of major hurt. Sometimes I wonder if that isn't exactly what this WH squatting bunch truly wants. I hope not!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. All I noticed
was the irony that this man was speaking against Hitler and Lee, since his beliefs are exactly in line with theirs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. 'right-wing' and 'logic' in the same sentence is an oxymoron
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC