Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Job of our 'leaders': Managing image or managing reality?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:22 AM
Original message
Job of our 'leaders': Managing image or managing reality?
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 03:39 AM by DLnyc
This is a question I would like the hear the press pose:

"Can you give an estimate, Mr. (shrub, dummy, dead-eye, choose one), of how much time you and your staff devote to managing your image, as compared to how much time you and your staff devote to actually thinking about reality and policy?"

Examples of shrub WH approach to problems:

1) Reality: Iraq is an escalating disaster and the public is starting to get pissed off about that.
Response: Let's convince people that things are great in Iraq and it's all the media's fault that it looks bad.

2) Reality: Thousands of people are dying in New Orleans.
Response: Let's spend the week putting together some really spiffy photo-ops so people will think we care.

3) Reality: The rising level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is leading us toward environmental disaster.
Response: Let's get some 'scientists' to say that's not true, and prevent NOAA and NASA from talking about it.

4) Reality: American jobs are going overseas.
Response: Let's convince people that they're better off losing their jobs so they can buy stuff cheaper with the money they don't have.

5) Reality: Al Qaeda has the capability and the desire to pull off a massive attack on American soil.
Response: Have * spend a month down in Texas cutting brush so people will get a nice fuzzy feeling seeing how relaxed he is.

6) Reality: Someone actually DID pull off a massive attack on American soil. Maybe we should change our procedures.
Response: Quick, let's do a photo-op, declare some wars, resist an inquiry, stonewall the inquiry when it happens anyway, then classify and rewrite most of the results.

7) Reality: The American public is beginning to see that the whole * administration is a bunch of lying, stealing, torturing, warmongering, drunken, two-faced, back-stabbing flim-flam artists and they're starting to get pissed off about that.
Response: . . . ? time for an exit strategery ??

(edit): Possible follow-up question: "Wouldn't it perhaps be more efficient to spend some time getting the reality and policies right in the first place, so that the image wouldn't need so much spinning?"

(edit 2) (typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. excellent post
K&R :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks.
An example of the lengths they go to to spin stuff:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x199524

'"We call it 'influence,' " says Craig, whose business has 12 U.S. government contracts totaling more than $130 million.'

(WAPO on Lincoln Group . . . planted stories in Iraq)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. he and dick and condi esp. should be engaged in some serious
diplomacy with other countries--some kind of summit to help Iraqi people instead of educating us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, they appear to spend almost no time working on a solution
and almost all of their time working on spinning. Although, if Democrats can make this an issue, I have no doubt they will start spending some time making it SEEM like they are spending some time on reality instead of image.

We could expect to see stuff like this:

"The media just doesn't report it when we think about reality. The media needs to start running some stories about all the great meetings we have talking about reality."

"The pResident today allowed selected press members to attend a 'reality meeting' of the cabinet. Insiders, who requested anonimity in exchange for discussing confidential plans, revealed that the pResident plans to give a series of talks this week highlighting the new slogan: "Reality: we care". In other news, Nancy Pelosi questioned the expenditure of $20 million of taxpayer money to finance the new campaign, claiming that the "Reality, we care" program is "basically political in nature".

"When Helen Thomas called the pResidents new program a "bunch of bullshit", Mr. Bush responded that her comment was "typical of the left-wing terrorist media, who don't understand that everything changed after 9/11".

etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. heh
Reality: The American public is beginning to see that the whole * administration is a bunch of lying, stealing, torturing, warmongering, drunken, two-faced, back-stabbing flim-flam artists and they're starting to get pissed off about that.
Response: . . . ? time for an exit strategery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC