Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poor MFing rightwingnut idiots; explosives and bombs are NOT "wmd".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 03:29 AM
Original message
Poor MFing rightwingnut idiots; explosives and bombs are NOT "wmd".
See, if bombs were "wmd"...well what the fuck do ya think we're using to bomb the living shit out of the men, women & children of Iraq?

Stupid fuckers.

NUKES are "wmd". But Iraq has NEVER had a nuke. Not even a miniature one.

Now try to grasp this fact (I know it's difficult for stupid MFers such as yourselves, but do try);

BOMBS and EXPLOSIVES are NOT "wmd".

And by the way, CAMELS are NOT a "delivery system".

:rofl:

Rightwingnuts; stupidest MFers on the planet...but they sure are good at making fools of themselves!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. The one exception would be cluster bombs-forbidden-but used
by the US in Iraq. We supplied and utilized the only wmd in Iraq.

The other is depleted uranium--responsible for massive, delayed onset casualties among all participants, as well as DU radioactive fallout in Europe and the UK. The US has brought atomic war to the middle east. This certainly qualifies as a wmd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Cluster bombs are not "wmd". They are banned weapons and they are
"indiscriminate" weapons, but they are not "wmd".

The "liberal media" blurred the entire "wmd" thing to the point where we have morans thinking CAMELS and HUMANS are "wmd". The UN was stupid for ever coing up with that bullshit "wmd" term in the first place.

ABC; atomic, biological, chemical.

NBC; nuclear, biological, chemical.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hearing what they want to hear...
They have a need to wish the B*** lies into reality.

WMD=nuclear weapons, and since we never found any, we should not be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Even bush & Cabal knew Iraq had no nukes, they said so.
bush & Cabal went on & on about how Iraq COULD one day get a nuke and we couldn't afford to wait until then! So instead of a dozen things bush COULD have done, bush kicked out the weapons inspectors and waged his illegal supreme crime war of aggression against the people of Iraq.

But even bush knew -and said publicly- Iraq had no nukes.

So there was no need to look for any.

America; waging "supreme crime" wars of aggression. Hitler's gotta be laughing his arse off, coz irony doesn't get any blacker than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Their were faux nuts claiming Saddam firing a rifle from a balcony was WMD
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. They are so deeply ignorant, aren't they. Doesn't put US school system
in a very good light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Agree but
here is an interesting bit from the BBC's e-cyclopedia:

"DISPUTED DEFINITION: the FBI says conventional explosives can also be WMD. "A weapon crosses the WMD threshold when the consequences of its release overwhelm local responders."

DISPUTED DEFINITION (TWO): Colombia's Vice President Gustavo Bell Lemus told the UN that small arms are also WMD, because bullet fatalities "dwarf that of all other weapons systems - and in most years greatly exceed the toll of the atomic bombs that devastated Hiroshima and Nagasaki".

DISPUTED DEFINITION (THREE): some say that fewer - rather than more - weapons should be deemed capable of mass destruction. "

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2744411.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. VP Lemus was being sarcastic. He's also correct; small arms kill
more than all other weapons systems.

FBI can say whatever they like; fact is, conventional weapons are not "wmd".

"Fewer rather than more" is correct. Currently the only "wmd" are nukes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. I wrote a thread about this several years ago when they first coined the
term "weapons of mass destruction." The term bothered me because I knew immediately what they were doing. Making all the countries who DON'T have weapons of mass destruction the bad guys.

When you make up a term like that you are clearly implying that the people with no nukes are the dangerous ones. Otherwise you just say nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. My hubby is an NBC expert; you should see him & his unit go off
at the merest mention of the word "wmd", LOL!

NO SUCH THING they will all inform you...and then comes the long lesson on ABC/NBC and how idiotic the term "wmd" is.

Funny thing how the term "wmd" only came into popular usage in 2003. What a fucking co-inky-dink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malmapus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah, always called it NBC myself lol
Then all of a sudden it's all WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Kinda tough to call Saddam Hussein an "NBC" I suppose,
:rofl:

Rightwingnuts do love their jingoism.

An aside; I love the Cambridge Dictionary definition of "jingoism";

"Patriotism can turn into jingoism and intolerance very quickly.

Ya don't say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC