Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Antonin Scalia: The barbarian on the supreme court.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:48 AM
Original message
Antonin Scalia: The barbarian on the supreme court.
Scalia's son was in Iraq, therefore, to his way of thinking, no one in Guantanamo is entitled to a trial.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/shared-gen/ap/US_Supreme_Court/Scalia_Guantanamo.html

Speaking in front of a European audience, he said, "If (the prisoner) was captured by my army on a battlefield, (Guantanamo) is where he belongs. I had a son on that battlefield and they were shooting at my son and I'm not about to give this man who was captured in a war a full jury trial."

He went on to tell the European audience he was "astounded" at their "hypocrisy."

Talk about hypocrisy. This is about a case coming before the supreme court and since Scalia's son having been in Iraq is influencing his opinion, he should recuse himself. It's been shown time and again that most prisoners in Guantanamo were people who were just in the wrong place at the wrong time, or innocent people turned in by someone with a grudge.

If foreigners held all Americans to Scalia's so-called standards, we'd be screaming our heads off. I hope to someday see Scalia in the Hague along with Bush, Cheney, Rove, et al. receiving a trial he would deny others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fat Tony Is A Shit House Crazy Rat Bastard n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Second Binka! The RAT BASTARD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Scalia thinks he's God. So does Bush. I say let's lock them
In a room and let them fight it out. We'll put whoever survives on trial and make sure it's an honest one. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. You have to admit

He does an excellent job representing the interests of Whacko-Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R. damn
If we had any REAL news, we'd have all heard about this. Mr. Murrow where are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Where is his own life mentioned as a standard in the Constitution?
He is insane. And a hypocrite of exponential degree to boot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. I am astounded that this man has no grasp of the consequences of torture.
Torturing the enemy (any enemy) only makes them fight harder and more savagely. If prisoners are treated humanly, the enemy can not illicit righteous outrage and spur their followers to further violence. By torturing prisoners, we declare that our way of life, our system of justice, is a front for power and control.

Torture only motivates our enemy and distances our allies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Scalia and Pope Prada* (as Ratzinger has been nicknamed by Italian wags)
Edited on Mon Mar-27-06 08:24 AM by SpiralHawk
What a pair.

Perfect compadres for the Skull-&-Boner-in-Chief of the "Homeland."


As for me, I not making no mindfuck psychological move to no steenkin "Homeland."

I choose to remain a loyal, and liberal citizen of the good, old United States of America (that's the US of A for you Freepers who have forgotten).


* Pope Prada insists on the fanciest, most cutting edge designs in his vestments. Apparently part of the new church doctrine is the BELIEF that one can not overemphasize the importance of High Fashion when ministering to the hungy, naked, and homeless of the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Ay carumba. Plus he's opus dei, self-flaggellation and fashion!
God's representative on Earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. I guess there's a silver lining everywhere. If it weren't for Jesus, how
would the new Pope be paying for his Prada shoes? Well, what the hell. This Pope is taking Max Bialistock's advice: "If you got it, flaunt it."

(Max Bialistock is the main character in Mel Brooks' "The Producers.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. So if his son is captured, it's OK for the enemy to torture him?
There's a special place in Hell....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. Mr Scalia, please explain how a person can be imprisoned legally.
1) That person has committed a crime under our laws and is being held for trial, or has been convicted in an open court in a trial by a jury.

2) That person participated in a war against our armed forces, and must be treated as a Prisoner Of War under the Geneva Conventions and the UN Charter.

There is no third option.

Its appalling that a US Supreme Court Justice fails to understand the law. Its appalling that he should toe the party line AGAINST the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. I forgot to mention in the OP that the case is about Osama's chauffeur.
Make that former chauffeur. I can just see him driving Bin Laden around a battlefield, one hand on the wheel and an AK47 in the other hand, mowing down American troops.

Why don't we just get Scalia's driver and lynch him for chauffeuring around a prick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. He's already made up his mind w/o argument! If there ever was a case
for recussal, this would be it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Scalia went duck hunting with Cheney during a supreme court case in which
Cheney was involved.

He probably didn't recuse himself because Cheney threatened to shoot him in the face if he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well maybe they should have a duel! We could get lucky, 2 birds w one
shot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Using the bench to impose his own personal preferences
even though that's what he claims to be against.

Either schizophrenic or the worst sort of hypocrite. Probably both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. My Son is in Iraq and I don't believe in torture
because I would prefer if he were imprisoned, they would treat him fairly, like we should be doing our prisoners... I guess it is just the person, not the situation that would make one want torture....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. Hey Fat Tony!
Fuck You!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Oh no! You mean, they were ... shooting ... at his SON????
That's what war IS, you fat asshole Tony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. People would not have been shooting at his son
if we had not illegally invaded their country. He calls it "shooting at my son." I am sure they call it defending their homes against the invaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. This actually reminds me of GWB's assumption that because
Hussein "tried to kill dad" he had a right to use the American military and taxpayers' money to seek revenge.

Now, my daughter was hit by a car while jogging in Dublin a few weeks ago. (No, she wasn't seriously hurt--just scraped up.) The more I think about it, the more I think we should invade Ireland. I mean, I really love my daughter, and some Irish guy hit her with a car! She wasn't even shooting at him, as Scalia's son probably was shooting at some Iraqis, and she hadn't fought a war with him, as Bush's dad had with Hsusein. She was just innocently jogging, so there was even less justification for hitting her with a car.

We need to strike Ireland premptively, so we can fight careless Irish drivers over there rather than over here, where even more innocent American joggers could be hit by Irish drivers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I meant "to kill dad," but forgot that using brackets for the
editorial change would make the word disappear. Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Hah! Apparently angle brackets also make the word "my"
disappear. I meant "to kill MY dad."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. I wonder what his son thinks about this
his comrades are still there and are in more danger cuz of this kind of stupidity. I wonder what kind of relationship they have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC