Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Please Call And Damand Oversite (RE:USA Patriot Act) (202) 224-3121

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 12:59 PM
Original message
Please Call And Damand Oversite (RE:USA Patriot Act) (202) 224-3121
In short, Bush said, “Thanks Congress for this bill, now go to hell if you think I am going to follow it.”

From the Boston Globe
When President Bush signed the reauthorization of the USA Patriot Act this month, he included an addendum saying that he did not feel obliged to obey requirements that he inform Congress about how the FBI was using the act's expanded police powers.

The bill contained several oversight provisions intended to make sure the FBI did not abuse the special terrorism-related powers to search homes and secretly seize papers. The provisions require Justice Department officials to keep closer track of how often the FBI uses the new powers and in what type of situations. Under the law, the administration would have to provide the information to Congress by certain dates.


Bush signed the bill with fanfare at a White House ceremony March 9, calling it ''a piece of legislation that's vital to win the war on terror and to protect the American people." But after the reporters and guests had left, the White House quietly issued a ''signing statement," an official document in which a president lays out his interpretation of a new law.


In the statement, Bush said that he did not consider himself bound to tell Congress how the Patriot Act powers were being used and that, despite the law's requirements, he could withhold the information if he decided that disclosure would ''impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative process of the executive, or the performance of the executive's constitutional duties."


Bush wrote: ''The executive branch shall construe the provisions . . . that call for furnishing information to entities outside the executive branch . . . in a manner consistent with the president's constitutional authority to supervise the unitary executive branch and to withhold information . . . "


The statement represented the latest in a string of high-profile instances in which Bush has cited his constitutional authority to bypass a law.


Of ever there was a reason to call your congress person (you have 1 House Member, and 2 Senators), you can reach them all by calling the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121. CALL THEM NOW PLEASE, DEMAND THAT THEY DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please keep kicked, this is the most important thing we have....
The USA Pat Act was hard as hell to ram through, we have a real issue here.

Come-on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I guess I am the only one who thinks this is a big deal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...
Edited on Mon Mar-27-06 02:06 PM by converted_democrat
I give up.. I can't pretend we live in a democracy anymore..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Byrd's Office told me to email them a link....
Maybe we should all do this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think it's important. Hell, how could you not?
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is as if even here at the DU many do not
truly understand what these signing statements and the PA are being used for by this administration.

If I believed in a god I would say heaven help us about now.

Thank you for trying and caring Ioo. It matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC