Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ralph Reed gets smacked by conservative magazine.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:15 PM
Original message
Ralph Reed gets smacked by conservative magazine.
Ralph Reed, candidate for Georgia lieutenant governor and former executive director of the Christian Coalition, has a standard line when opponents link him to disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff. "The Democrats, radical left, and dominant media have made numerous unfair personal attacks against Ralph," his Web site declares. Lately, however, it's becoming harder for Reed to dismiss his critics as ideologically motivated. One of the toughest is Marvin Olasky, a close associate of President Bush who helped developed the administration's faith-based initiative and the concept of "compassionate conservatism."

Olasky, a journalism professor at the University of Texas, is editor in chief of World magazine, the mission of which "is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever." Since Nov. 19, World has run 10 articles and essays describing the $4 million in gambling money Abramoff paid to Reed to lobby against casinos competing with Abramoff's clients. The articles have highlighted incriminating e-mails and other disclosures that have raised doubts about Reed's explanations of his activities.

Reed, Olasky wrote March 4, "has damaged Christian political work by confirming for some the stereotype that evangelicals are easily manipulated and that evangelical leaders use moral issues to line their own pockets." On Feb. 6, Reed wrote Olasky to say he was " very disappointed that WORLD would repeat false and politically-motivated attacks by liberal groups in Texas."

In language similar to his campaign stump responses, Reed said: "Had I known then what I know now, I would not have undertaken the work. On reflection, I should have declined the work and I regret any difficulty it has caused the pro-family community, for which I have accepted full responsibility. . . . What I do not appreciate and what I am confident your readers will reject is an unfair attempt by the media to engage in guilt by association."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/25/AR2006032500815_pf.html

Repent, Ralph, REPENT!! You have SINNED!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
biscotti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have been following this little worm
since the early 90's. What a despicable little creep. He has always just reeked of slime and corruption. I can't imagine how he pulled off his act so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd hate to see the portrait in HIS attic
You just know it's a suppurating pus bloated oozing lump...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rolling Stone does a nice job on the Reed/Abramoff connection
The newest issue with the American Idol judges on the cover.

I can't find it online but here is a link to their Abramoff story which is great:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/9519825/meet_mr_republican_jack_abramoff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC