Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“Saeed Sheikh was probably a triple agent”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 05:40 PM
Original message
“Saeed Sheikh was probably a triple agent”
Kandahar hijacking, 9/11 ‘linked’
Satish Misra
Tribune News Service
New Delhi, March 26

Quote:

Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, one of the three terrorists who were taken to Kandahar for release by the then External Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh, was one of the key planners and perpetrators of the most daring terrorist attempt on the US soil, said a former military intelligence analyst John Newman during his testimony before the 9/11 inquiry commission.

Newman went on to say that “Saeed Sheikh was probably a triple agent” who operated for Pakistani, American and British intelligence while being an Al-Qaida’s top functionary. After his release in 1999, Ahmad Omar Saeed Sheikh, a British national of Pakistani origin, was appointed member of the Majlis Al-Shura by Osama Bin Laden, said the testimony, which did not find mention in the final report on 9/11.



Link-
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2006/20060327/main2.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. More here on the Paki spike of the 9/11 Comm. Report
This article, if accurate, provides important new details on the information that was alledgedly withheld from the 9/11 Commission Report at the behest of GOP lobbyists wotking for Pakistan. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/3/14/133330/930

It also appears to confirm that CIA had penetrated al-Qaeda with double-agents, and how Mr. Sheikh put a "secure" communications system in place that was ready-made for NSA interception.

We have to ask, why is this being released now?

More of the report, below:
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2006/20060327/main2.htm

Despite startling revelations about Islamabad’s involvement in the 9/11 by Newman, the military government of General Pervez Musharraf succeeded in getting vital information removed from the final report. Bin Laden referred to Sheikh as his son. No attempt was made to arrest when he returned to Pakistan from Kandahar where he was set free in exchange of Indian hostages in IC 814 episode. The ISI gave him a house and protection from the police. He lived openly and frequented swanky parties attended by senior government officials, observed Newman adding that the US government sources told Newsweek that he was a “protected asset” of the ISI. Sheikh, who carried many names, including Mustafa Ahmed, Mustafa Shmed al-Hasawi, Mustafa Mahmoud Saeed Ahmed, Mustafa Mohammed Ahmed, is a hijacking, kidnapping and financial expert. He was tasked with killing Daniel Pearl and is understood to have funded 9/11 by wiring $100,000 to Mohammed Atta.

Sheikh, the man about whom the Commission of Inquiry report utters no word, overhauled Al-Qaida’s logistics, communications and financial networks and was given responsibilities in international liaisons such as relations with the Hezbollah or the Sudanese National Islamic Front. To facilitate financial and communications needs, he designed a new secure, encrypted, web-based communications system for Al-Qaida. There was talk that he would someday succeed Bin Laden. Over and above all these responsibilities, Sheikh had another extremely sensitive job for Al-Qaida.

He was the group’s principal liaison with the ISI. He worked closely with various current and former officers of Pakistani intelligence, including Lieut-General Mohammed Aziz Khan, who along with President Pervez Musharraf himself, was the most powerful commander in Pakistan. A product of the London School of Economics, he went on to play a vital role in 9/11 by financing the hijackers. For his trouble, he received the same impersonal budget as the two other key coordinators, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi bin Al-Shibh. As the 9/11 attacks neared, ISI chief General Ahmed became more deeply mired in the plot, apparently to secure new sources of funds for the airline tickets needed for the reconnaissance flights on the date of the attack.

SNIP

On the orders of the ISI chief, Sheikh wired the money to hijack leader Mohammad Atta. Flush with money, Atta Hamzi and Hanzour flew first class on the type of aircraft they would use on September 11, 2001. All this does not find mention in the commission report because both the USA and the British governments were keen to enlist Pakistan as a key ally in their attack on Afghanistan. Recent revelations in the Pakistani media have confirmed that Islamabad had paid tens of thousand dollars to lobbyists in the USA to get anti-Pakistan references dropped from the 9/11 report.

SNIP



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Some background for non-9/11 dungeon DUers
Edited on Mon Mar-27-06 06:55 PM by HamdenRice
Saeed Sheikh is the smoking gun for 9/11 MIHOP for people who do not focus on "controlled demolition."

Here is the crux of these facts: the 9/11 hijackings were sponsored by a government other than Afghanistan's Taliban; it was also financed by Pakistan. The guy who paid for the 9/11 attacks flew to DC to meet with the US defense and intelligence establishment around 9/6/01.

The head of Pakistan's intelligence agency (the ISI) was General Mahmoud Ahmad. Gen. Ahmad ordered that $100,000 be sent to Mohammed Atta, the ringleader of the 9/11 hijackings, from his intelligence agency's funds. He ordered the notorious ISI operative Saeed Sheikh, at that time in Dubai, to send the money to Atta. Atta used the money for the expenses of the hijacking plot, including flight school training. Gen. Ahmad, therefore, was the paymaster of the 9/11 hijackings and attacks.

Gen. Ahmad, however, flew to Washington, DC, around 9/06/01, and met with his counterparts at the highest levels of the Bush administration: the Pentagon, the CIA, the State Department and the National Security Council.

At the moment that the planes were flying into the World Trade Centers, Gen. Ahmad, the paymaster of the 9/11 attacks, was having a breakfast meeting with the chairmen of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, Rep. Porter Goss (Republican) and Sen. Bob Graham (Democrat), both of Florida. According to mainstream media press reports, they were discussing terrorism emanating from Afghanistan.

Goss, as you must be aware, was a retired CIA agent and was thereafter appointed head of the CIA.

The journalist who reported these facts for the Wall Street Journal was Daniel Pearl. When Pearl tried to trace this money trail from Atta back to the Pakistan ISI, he was kidnapped and beheaded in Pakistan by none other than Saeed Sheikh.

All of this is public record in mainstream media sources, yet good progressive people refuse to learn these facts, and call anyone who cites these facts in support of either LIHOP or MIHOP as "wacky" conspiracy theorists.

Just Google Mahmoud Ahmad (or Ahmed) and 9/11 or Atta, and learn about the smoking gun.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Interesting stuff, to say the least.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. There is another explanation.
Let's assume for the moment that this article is based in fact. Mr. Sheikh was a triple agent (or a double-agent working for several clients -- ISI, € and $), and that he actually gave good value to his clients over the years.

That would imply that Mr. Sheikh: 1) gave ISI good information about UBL; and 2) he installed a communications system that was easily monitored by British and US intelligence, and maintained the confidence of the western intelligence agencies, at least until 9/11.

Since Skeikh is still alive and under Pakistani protection, I'm going to assume that Sheikh was also telling Ahmed what CIA and MI6 thought they were learning through the bugged communications. A very valuable feedback loop for Pakistani intelligence. If ISI was indeed Sheikh's real employer all along, that would make him simply a Pakistani intelligence asset. The fact that he was also responsible for blowing up an Indian airliner (at a time that Pakistan and India were in an undeclared state of war), but was swapped back by India, and was subsequently never sought by either the UK or US on terrorism charges, also indicates that he was, in the final analysis, a Pakistani intelligence agent.

It appears to me that Mr. Sheikh and some faction of Pakistani intelligence was directly behind 9/11, or at least knew many details about the attack (but not everything), and either withheld that information from the US or the warnings were ignored.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are reasons
people say Al-CIA-DUH


They didn't just pull it out of their ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. BUDDY BUDDY WITH GEORGE TENENT BUDDY BUDDY WITH ATTA
BUDDY BUDDY

http://www.gsnmagazine.com.nyud.net:8090/images/aug_05/atta.jpg

DO THE MATH

24 MINUTES

THERE MUST HAVE BEEN A MILITARY ORDER
WATCH THIS VIDEO

http://www.bushflash.com/buddy.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC