Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huh?: Consumer confidence at 4-year high

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:14 AM
Original message
Huh?: Consumer confidence at 4-year high
ECONOMIC REPORT
Consumer confidence at 4-year high

E-mail | Print | | Disable live quotes By Rex Nutting, MarketWatch
Last Update: 10:11 AM ET Mar 28, 2006


WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- U.S. consumer attitudes brightened in March, rising unexpectedly to the most optimistic since May 2002, the Conference Board said Tuesday.
The consumer confidence index rose to 107.2 from an upwardly revised 102.7 in February, despite higher gasoline prices.
Economists expected a reading of 101.8, according to a survey conducted by MarketWatch. See Economic Calendar.
The present situation index rose to 133.3 from 130.3, the highest since August 2001. Read the full release.
However, the near-term outlook is still somewhat pessimistic. The expectations index rose to 89.9 from 84.2.

http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7BAAE1F42C%2D6321%2D4598%2D9C0D%2D2401AFBD1DDE%7D&siteid=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. just goes to show you what people can get used to....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nobody asked me
or anyone I know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I wasn't asked, they wouldn't want to hear my answer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misternormal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. I guess Capitol One sent out their new batch...
... of "Pre-Approved, put yourself in debt to your eyeballs" letters...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. WTF? And May 2002 wasn't exactly the height of optimism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:19 AM
Original message
Momentary bump
Tax returns are coming in, people are spending that money on things that they know they won't be able to afford next month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't need a survey to SEE what's going on
I say BS to their "survey"
Small businesses are disappearing all the time.
Check it out in your own supermarkets...the meat counters look more like they are stocked for the depression. That is not the result of consumer confidence, it's the result of a changing economy, and not changing for the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. In whose world is Consumer Confidence High
certainly not in mine.!!

:grr:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. LOL! Does anybody believe this BS?
BushCo has lied about most every subject under the sun and this "survey" is no different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Eggsactly
This is enron book-keeping. Punch up a copy of Asia Times for the real scoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wake me up when it is at a six-year high...
Yes, it hit bottom after 9-11 but a small rise from the bottom is nothing to crow about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's all in the spin.
Consumer confidence is not high, it is the highest in four years. Still in the negative numbers, just not as negative as before.

Check out http://pollingreport.com/consumer.htm

On a scale of +100 to -100 consumer confidence is -8. Not in the positive! It has been as low as -20, so -8 is higher, just not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. we're still drowning, but in more shallow water than thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. Be interesting to see it when gas is 3.50 in August.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedicord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, my consuming confidence is so friggin' high...
I didn't buy a $3.50 beta fish yesterday.

Sheesh, you can't buy a gallon of milk and a loaf of bread for less than $5.00 any more. When the necessities, like gas, food, rent and utilities skyrocket how can people be "confident"?:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. Much like any other official economic number,
The devil is in how they figure it out. And usually it is a tilted game.

The Consumer Confidence Index is done by a mail survey of 5000 people every month. They are asked five questions:

Respondents appraisal of current business conditions.
Respondents expectations regarding business conditions six months hence.
Respondents appraisal of the current employment conditions.
Respondents expectations regarding employment conditions six months hence.
Respondents expectations regarding their total family income six months hence.

For each of the 5 questions, there are three response options: POSITIVE, NEGATIVE and NEUTRAL.

Then there is some statistical black magic done, responses are "seasonably adjusted":wtf: and are compared to a *1985* benchmark(again:wtf:)

Like with the unemployment figures, it seems to me, and also to many economists, that this is a number that is really tilted in favor of producing bright, shiny optimistic reports. Many demographic groups are either underrepresented, or not represented at all(the homeless come to mind). In fact, according to the Conference Report's own figures, they only get a seventy percent response rate on average. And we all know the perils of the flucuating numbers that surround averages.

So yes, we should put some stock in this number, but frankly not a whole lot. Besides, here in a month it will probably be quietly revised downwards, much like what happens with unemployment and inflation numbers.

For more information on the methodology behind this index<http://www.conference-board.org/cgi-bin/MsmGo.exe?grab_id=40&EXTRA_ARG=&SCOPE=Public&CFGNAME=MssFind%2Ecfg&host_id=42&page_id=14942464&query=five+survey+questions&hiword=five+QUESTIONSE+survey+SURVEYED+SURVEYING+SURVEYS+QUESTION+QUESTIONABLE+QUESTIONED+QUESTIONING+questions+QUESTIONSA+>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. Once Again, Statistics With No Context
The margin of error in this survey is +/- 2 points! Now, for this particular survey, that margin of error is a probable, or expected error, of any result. So, this means it's the point at which 50% of all values would be contained within a distribution.

What's this all mean?

It means that the survey has a standard deviation of 3 units, so the actual expected range of this survey result is +/- 9!!!!!! Yeah, 9 units. That with no assignable cause, the value can move up or down 9 units based upon the random fluctations of behaviors, moods, and expectations within the general population.

So, this 3 point uptick is absolutely apropos of NOTHING!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Batgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. oh my, whomever shall I believe?
The official reports or what I acutally see and hear going on around me. Maybe it's just my own personal back luck that I only seem to encounter workers who are out of work, businesses doing less business, people in general figuring out how to get by on less.

Maybe I don't hang out at the right yacht clubs and that's why I never actually witness all this brightening of consumer attitudes.

Literally every single person I know is worried sick about their economic prospects. My mom is worried she might live too long, that being defined as living long enough to witness the successful destruction of medicare and social security. People my age are clinging to the remnants of their middle class lifestyles watching the cost of living go up while their incomes go down. And random bits of conversation overheard in public places are often related to how bad things are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC