Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Under Bolten’s Leadership-Fed Debt Ballooned By $1.8 Trillion In 34 Months

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:16 AM
Original message
Under Bolten’s Leadership-Fed Debt Ballooned By $1.8 Trillion In 34 Months
Under Bolten’s Leadership, Federal Debt Ballooned By $1.8 Trillion In 34 Months



$6.592 trillion: Federal debt on June 26, 2003, the day Josh Bolten became director of the Office of Management and Budget.

$8.364 trillion: Federal debt today.

In the Bush administration, this is grounds for a promotion.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/28/bolten-debt-balooned/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. How embarassing. Did you have to bring THAT up?
do you mean to say that this clown is a major freakoid factor in the massive $9 Trillion debt that Bush and the Republicans have hung around the neck of America?

Shocking. Shameful.

Kickable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. typical * move, promoting insiders when they've proven themselves inept
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Eh....gotta be honest
That charge is a bit disingenuous. The OMB does pull together the budget priorities for the White House, but this Republican Congress has consistently greeted those recommendations with little regard. Not to say he's a deficit hawk/tightwad, but Bolten is more the nuts and bolts guy...he doesn't have anything to do with the actual level or execution of the federal budget....that's Congress' turf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And Yet, It Hardly Seems The Stuff Of Promotability
Besides, once it's appropriated, there is nothing that FORCES the administration to spend all the money, as long as the enforcement of laws are not impeded. (After all that's the first duty of the executive branch, enforcing the laws. It's NOT to protect us! That's a post-9/11 coward's definition.)

The Clinton administration did it with the first three budgets. They raised marginal rates and then insisted on cabinet departments doing their best to UNDERSPEND the budgets passed. That's why the reversal of deficits to balance happened so fast! (Plus a true economic expansion as opposed to this artificial nonsense extant today.)
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Having been employed in the federal government during the Clinton era...
...I can tell you the "underspending" part was definitely not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sorry. You're Wrong
The numbers are clear.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC