Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Children of Undocumented Workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
oldlady Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:20 AM
Original message
Children of Undocumented Workers
It bothers me that the discussion doesn't include them. I know quite a few undocumented or falsely-documented workers. They work in many different types of workplaces, but MOST have one thing in common beyond their citizenship status-- children with US citizens. Most are men who came across the border at ages 18-22...who'd they pair up with-- our daughters. I hate to think of all those families being torn apart. Family values, yeah right. Same goes for guest worker programs...gonna be a lot of un-daddied babies in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. You've got to be joking.
this is a joke right????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Curious here; what do you find so funny? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's no joke ....
Children born here are automatically US citizens. Unless you change THAT law, the problem the OP stated is very real.

Will you start deporting those kids too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Law? you mean this law?
AMENDMENT XIV

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.

Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.

Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


so it would require a constitutional amendment

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. There is no such law
It is a part of the Constitution: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. (Amendment XIII, section 1)

Frankly, I would be very, very leery of allowing right of citizenship to be determined only by law and not by constitutional protection. The idea that neo-con rightards could determine, by legislative act, who is and is not a citizen (and thus protected by constitutional rights) scares me near to death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Diadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. They don't deport the children..it happened here to Koreans
They shipped BOTH parents back to Korea and left the 15 yr old here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldlady Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. not at all funny to me
my grandson's father is not here legally. They are not married as he lacks enough paperwork to apply for a license. We worry daily about my grandson losing his dad. No. not funny at all & not a joke. I know at least 8 families in similar circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. marriage to a US citizen is an automatic resident alien status n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. An old friend's son-in-law who lives in TX was almost
kicked out of the US; he's Mexican, married to a citizen and has three children. This was right after 9/11 and, after jumping through many hoops including hiring a lawyer, he finally got resident alien status. But they sure don't make it easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. No, it is not...
If the spouse overstayed a visa, the process is far from automatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Indeed, a friend of mine has been sent back to Mexico
and my husband had the same problem, although being from India they didn't send him back.

I'm not saying they are picking and choosing, but--well, I guess I am saying they are picking and choosing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. No it's not.
Our cousin from the UK married an American. They had to go through a lengthy approval process to prove that they wanted to be married and that it was not a shame marriage for immigration purposes. Even then, she was not allowed to work for six months.

I'm sorry about the children. Under the 14th Amend. They are citizens. I suppose the choice is either let them stay in the USA with the mother if she is a citizen or else let them be raised in the parent's country of residence until they attain majority. Otherwise, the child could be placed for adoption with an American couple. In any event, no reward must be allowed for those who enter this country unlawfully. These people have willfully broken the law.

If you know of people living unlawfully in this country, I submit that you have a duty to your nation to put your personal feelings aside and report it to INS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maiden England Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. NO it is not
I married my Husband, who is a US citizen. I then had to return to the UK to wait for my visa to be processed. It was another 11 months before I got to come back to the US legally. If you want to marry someone and stay, you have to apply for a fiance visa - and prove the relationship is real before they give you a visa.

It also costs a fair amount (around $500-600), plus the US citizen has to earn a certain amount of money to be approved to 'support' you.

It is far far from automatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. no....if spouse is in another they have to wait like anyone else!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. I think it is a big part of the debate...
although we never get to discuss because the meme about jobs is at the forefront.

Over half a million are protesting on the streets. They know the impact on families. They are not protesting to steal jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. How about the children of legal immigrants of the past?
Edited on Tue Mar-28-06 10:57 AM by TahitiNut
Once upon a time, people migrated to the United States in order to work hard and leave a legacy for their children - a legacy that wouldn't be confiscated by the monarchs and dictators in the lands they left. The 'promise' of America was that these people could build a nation, through hard work and abiding with the Laws of The People, and that nation would be a legacy to their children.

They obeyed the laws and paid their dues. They helped build a nation, including its infrastructure. They didn't become wealthy, but they had a legacy nonetheless. We're seeing an elimination of estate taxes for those whose wealth was derived fom the labor of others and seeing another "estate" being confiscated/taxed in the Name of Cheap Labor, exploitation, and privileged wealth.

At the same time these domestic profiteers helped open the back door to the pressure cooker of the plantation economy of neighboring countries, they plugged up the regulated pressure release valve called 'legal immigration'. After all, we can't accept more legal immigrants (under our "quota" system) because it might actually offer an alternative to people who come here illegally and, because of that, are willing to work for less ... and can't vote!

Anyone who can't see this as a fiasco that's the result of human exploitation isn't looking very hard. At least that's how it looks to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. A few months ago some rightie in the House proposed amending
the constitution so that children of illegals born here are no longer automatic citizens. Can't remember who but I'll bet you anything it's buried in the bill passed by the house last week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC