Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official NSA Spying Hearing Thread # 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:57 AM
Original message
Official NSA Spying Hearing Thread # 2
Edited on Tue Mar-28-06 11:00 AM by liveoaktx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can't STAND Hatch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hatch is up which means I am required to direct all y'all to his opponents
website and ask for a donation - Pete Ashdown is GOOD PEOPLE and cares about keeping the internet free:

www.peteashdown.org

GET RID OF HATCH!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. So hatch is going after FISA itself?
Saying it diminished the power of the Prez to do his job. (I have heard this theory. Bypass the question of illegality and just declare that the PRez could do what he wanted anyway. The Constitution said so and always has. Sigh!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. FISA a constitutionally *infirm* advisory position (Hatch)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. So Hatch wants a toothless advisory FISA panel (isn't it already?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Hatch is a Facist
I have not been able to stand this asshole since Clinton impeachment....

He shills legal for the White House...is a giant fucking hypocrit...the law is only the law when it furthers his career or his nasty rasict ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. How long are the "rounds" today?
Leahy didn't seem to be up for very long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Seemed like 5 minutes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. How can you put a timer on Justice?
This is an important issue and they have a timer. I just don't understand that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. Would President have to appeal a FISA court decision (time constraints)
Hatch, using the Republican, takes too damn long to constrain Bush from spying right away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hatch is being an alarmist moron.
He's trying to get them to declare that there is a loophole for the OMG THE WORLD IS GOING TO END provision. As long as there is one loophole, they will use it. Fuckwads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. Feinstein up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. what is this "Denny's"? The "early bird rule"
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Would you like a warrant with your bacon?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Probable cause versus Reasonable suspicion in the case of
collecting surveill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. FISA -establish that a target is an agent of Foreign power- that
clears the probable cause hurdle for FISA.

DIFI like the extension of 72 hours to days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. DIFI-what should probable cause vs reasonable suspicion standard be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. Let's go DIFI
Let's go DIFI
:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idioteque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Feinstein! Feinstein! She's our woman! If she can't do it...
...Feingold can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
Two Feins are better than one! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. Baker-Probable cause a very low bar to make a WARRANTED surveillance
Foreign power outside the country, target inside the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. DIFI- Kornblum -President doing warrantless surv. FISA exclusive means
are FISA's rules binding on the president.

Kornblum-NO president has ever agree to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Kornblum-President would be remiss to surrender his power to a statute
what an ASS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Then is FISA not binding at all????
isn't the point of FISA to bind the president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Baker-Presidents are under the law, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Stafford- President can't be limited even if there's a law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. AHAH! And Feinstein takes the same tack! Good attack DiFi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
25. Feinstein saying 1978 law too old--needs to be update (overlooking fact
that Bush already broke the law)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. "is the Pres. held to the rules and regulations of FISA"-fYES -IF it is
held to be constitutional"---crapola.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Hope Feingold comes back to smack them with the KING argument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
29. second judge gave a caviet to Feinstein question also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
32. "The President's power under the Constitution..."
Why doesn't someone read the Constitution to them??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
33. "so you all believe that the FISA law is adversary to Bush" asked Fein-
stein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. Specter saying Bush held to FIsa BUT--his constitutional powers TRUMP
the FISA laws (Specter reimating judges responses)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. which would confirm DIFI's "FISA only advisory?" comment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
34. DIFI basically saying that if President can ignore law, then FISA advisory
only
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
35. Arlen jumps in to mitigate DiFi's attack, which blustered up the judges
STFU Arlen stop giving them the party line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
36. Specter is "leading the witness" just where he wants them to be
If they can't say it the way he wants, he'll say it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. Hopefully someone will call him on it. It really pisses me off.
It's just like the Alito hearings. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
37. Kornblutt- implying that President would be constrained by the Courts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
39. I hope DiFi or someone says "Urm, STFU Arlen"
Someone needs to tell him that he cannot feed answers to the panel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
40. Just-now-streaming question: Is the presupposition of this hearing
Edited on Tue Mar-28-06 11:16 AM by BuyingThyme
that the wiretaps being discussed are ALL al-Qaeda/terrorism related?

And are the Dems buying that load again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. They haven't really explicitly (except Hatch) used terrorism, rather
foreign power surveillance with the target domestic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. I doubt they are buying it, but I think it'd be too much to mention it.
Just my $.02.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
42. man, Kennedy looks old and tired....hope he stays healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #42
72. he has put weight on take weight off issue--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
46. Kennedy: Are we missing something that we could discuss in closed session?
Ensuring that they can't say "Well, we're not telling you everything."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
47. Kennedy- surveillance evidence not approved by FISA
BAKER-at district court level, would have trouble putting out evidence obtained that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #47
51. Kennedy-can people beat the rap if evidence obtained through NSA spying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
48. So that judge doesn't even know the specifics of the position
Edited on Tue Mar-28-06 11:19 AM by Sydnie
we find ourselves in, but is just lip service for what happened before?

edited typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
49. It's a shame this is on Cspan 3....unwatchable to most unless streaming...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. Yean, and my streaming is flaky-but it WILL show up later on Cspan
since they're recording it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
50. Kennedy hitting it on the nail--FISA put in place cause of Presidental
spying (unlawful)---asks What are we missing here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. Bingo!!!! This hearing is a sham. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
53. Kennedy-Carter said he would be BOUND by the law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
55. Durbin up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #55
58. Taking on Hatch that FISA wasn't intended to diminish the power
of the president. Durbin says he can't read FISA any other way since it says EXCLUSIVE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
56. Dubin up now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
57. Durbin up. Going for the jugular. 'EXCLUSIVE' word in FISA
:yourock: durbin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:25 AM
Original message
Wow! direct question by Sen. Durbin.
Anyone here who can say that the Prez didn't violate the FISA law when he did the wiretaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
59. Durbin: 3 options- Follow, Ignore or Change- Pres didn't do first two
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. "Anyone believe that the PResident didn't violate the law?" (Durbin)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #59
62. The judges seem to be pleading ignorance of the FISA law ???
Why are they there???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #62
66. To bolster Specter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #62
68. I think Durban is asking about the NEW proposed law now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #62
71. Not the law, but the current "program" that is the center of the debate
I agree. If they can't speak to what is actually happening, then they are debating in a vacuum. They have no first hand knowledge of anything that is happening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
61. Durbin: "Does anyone NOT believe he violated FISA?"
Judge: "I don't know the program."

Kennedy says that we're not missing anything so STFU stupid judge :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #61
63. Keenan-this is international, not domestic (per the press)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. Baker-IF also picking up domestic, ... it's a real question.. is the
president running around the statute?

Thank goodness there's ONE guy on here with some sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #65
69. Note, Baker is the judge Durbin specifically greeted personally.
could be a friendly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #61
64. Judge saying --he heard from Pres that the PROGRAM is international.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
67. Going to start a Thread Hearing #3 shortly, will put link up in a mo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #67
70. >>>LINK to Thread # 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
73. Durbin is still drinking Kool-Aid.
I have to assume all of the Dems are.

The purpose of this hearing is to gather support for something the Dems don't even understand.

The actual spying activity encompasses far more than the Gonzales testimony indicated. (Actually, his testimony did indicate a larger operation because he repeatedly used phrases like "this particular program," but Dems were not willing to listen.)

The Dems are failing us horribly by allowing this "hearing" to go forward without pinning the Pukes down on what the hell the witnesses are testifying about.

This activity, by design, will lead to a law which enables/permits secret spying without oversight. It will give Bush the RIGHT to spy on Americans without warrant. The Dems must be blamed as much as the Pukes. This is sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
74. Locking
Please continue discussion in the ongoing threads. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC