Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Connecticut Strike Shows Unions Are Only Ones Fighting for Workers(Sirota)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:23 AM
Original message
Connecticut Strike Shows Unions Are Only Ones Fighting for Workers(Sirota)
Connecticut Strike Shows Unions Are the Only Ones Left Fighting for Workers

Sikorsky is a very wealthy company - and it is wealthy thanks to the U.S. taxpayer. The company this year has roughly $9.1 billion in government contracts. The Connecticut Post notes that "Sikorsky's net operating profits for 2005 were $250 million, up 25 percent from 2004's $200 million in operating profit." Meanwhile, Sikorsky's parent company, United Technology Corp, "reported net income of $3.1 billion in 2005, up from $2.68 billion in 2004." There's nothing wrong with a company getting fat off the government dime, as long as it is producing valuable products, and as long as it is treating its workers well. And Sikorsky does produce the valuable Blackhawk helicopter. But what its doing to the workers who make that helicopter is shameful.

The Connecticut Post reports that despite swimming in taxpayer-funded profits, the company is proposing massive cuts to 3,600 workers' health care benefits. Under the plan, the Connecticut Post reports, "A Sikorsky employee with an individual health-care plan would pay a total of $1,009 more, while employees with coverage for themselves and their family members would pay an additional $3,528 over the life of the contract."

In response, the 3,600 workers opted to go on strike - but even then, the union offered concessions to end the strike. For instance, weeks ago the New Haven Register reported that "Teamsters Local 1150 offered to have union members pay 20 percent of the cost of health care and sign a four-year contract, rather than a three-year pact, both major concessions." That offer was rejected. Similarly, the Connecticut Post reported that "The Teamsters propose giving back part of the 3.5 percent pay raise over each of the next three years and forgoing a $2,000 signing bonus per employee." Again, that was rejected by company management focused on crushing workers and expanding already massive profits.

Instead, the company has hired temporary replacement workers, ignoring the fact that the workers who assemble the Blackhawk helicopters are among the most specialized manufacturing workers in the nation. Their skills are not easily picked up, begging the question: do we want our soldiers in Iraq flying around in Blackhawk helicopters made with replacement workers? Apparently, Sikorsky does, as the company is now considering making the replacement workers permanent workers, and sinking to the age old ploy of threatening to shut down its Connecticut operations.

more:
http://www.davidsirota.com/2006/03/connecticut-strike-shows-unions-are.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldensilence Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. wow
the oliogarchy is really on the move lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC