Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What are they hiding by replacing andy today?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
harpo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:35 PM
Original message
What are they hiding by replacing andy today?
That's what I'm wondering...they time everything a certain way on purpose to hide something else they are REALLY doing...slimebags they are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Methinks Mr. Fitzgerald will be calling on Mr. Card soon...
ratted out by Karl Rove in an attempt to cover his own ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. not getting my hopes up on any of that
but it would be nice if all of them got indicted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I lke
the way you think, harpo! I hadn't thought of that angle, but you are almost certainly correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I'm always thinking about that kind of thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tonights Dinner Time Fucksnews.....


The Bush administration has annonced that major BOMBIMG of nukuler facilitys in IRAN have started.....


Anything is possible........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:39 PM
Original message
Two Reasons, Probable
First, as someone else said, getting him out of the job before the Fitzgerald shoe drops.

Secondly, this might be the big "shakeup" that his more tepid supporters think is necessary for him to "save" his presidency and legacy. If this is the primary reason, this is pretty weak. Card didn't have any power anyway. He was basically in charge of the secretarial pool.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Two Reasons, Probable
First, as someone else said, getting him out of the job before the Fitzgerald shoe drops.

Secondly, this might be the big "shakeup" that his more tepid supporters think is necessary for him to "save" his presidency and legacy. If this is the primary reason, this is pretty weak. Card didn't have any power anyway. He was basically in charge of the secretarial pool.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Why Is Everything Posting 3 Times?????
This is pissin' me off!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. maybe its a sign of some sort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Two Reasons, Probable
First, as someone else said, getting him out of the job before the Fitzgerald shoe drops.

Secondly, this might be the big "shakeup" that his more tepid supporters think is necessary for him to "save" his presidency and legacy. If this is the primary reason, this is pretty weak. Card didn't have any power anyway. He was basically in charge of the secretarial pool.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. WHO IS ANDY CARD????????
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't know, let's ask Andy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Plus: What are they hiding by replacing him with another insider?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. THAT is what I want to know!
Bolton is another "Heck of a job" crony that needs to be rewarded, right? His budget analysis for Iraq was so right on...NOT!

A snippet from <http://www.dod.mil/speeches/2003/sp20030729-depsecdef0385.html>

On Iraq
Testimony as Delivered by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, and Director, Office of Management and Budget, Joshua Bolten, and Acting Chief of Staff, U.S. Army, General John Keane , Tuesday, July 29, 2003.


SEN. BIDEN: I want to try to ask a couple very specific questions, and if you could help me by giving as quick an answer as you could.

Mr. Bolten, what are your working assumptions, on the cost side, for the rest of '03 and for '04 for Iraq?

MR. BOLTEN: For the rest of '03, Senator Biden, the -- on the cost side, our working assumptions are those that Ambassador Bremer has brought back to us. He's anticipating expenditures in the range for the total of '03 of about 7.3 billion (dollars). And what that --

SEN. BIDEN: How much will you be requesting for the remainder of the year, if any, from the United States Congress to fund that need?

MR. BOLTEN: We don't anticipate requesting anything additional for the balance of this year.

SEN. BIDEN: What do you anticipate for '04?

MR. BOLTEN: I don't know the answer to that. Ambassador Bremer is -- has laid out a reasonably specific budget for the balance of '03, and I think he had an opportunity to discuss that with you. But even that was relatively crude, because of -- they're just getting a handle on so many of the variables that are in play right now.

SEN. BIDEN: Do you anticipate we'll be continuing to spend $4 billion a month for our troops in Iraq, for '04?

MR. BOLTEN: That's roughly what we're spending now. Looking out over the immediate term, we don't have any reason to expect a dramatic change in that number, but I wouldn't want to predict beyond the next couple of months, because the situation is so variable.

SEN. BIDEN: Don't you have to -- I mean, we're talking about the '04 budget. We're going to be voting on that in the next couple months. What the devil are you going to ask us for?

MR. BOLTEN: Well, the -- in the '04 budget -- and Senator, we've -- as you know, we've been very explicit about it -- we have not included the incremental costs of our fighting forces in Iraq, nor the costs of reconstruction. So you --

SEN. BIDEN: Why?

MR. BOLTEN: Simply because we don't know what they will be. We will --

SEN. BIDEN: Oh, come on now! Does anybody here at the table think we're going to be down below 100,000 forces in the next calendar year? Raise your hand, any one of you. You know it's going to be more than that. See, you know at least it's going to be $2-1/2 billion a month. Give me a break, will you? When are you guys starting to be honest with us? Come on! I mean, this is ridiculous. You're not even --

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. He's certainly got the lie-obfuscate-stonewall routine down.
I wonder who will be shuffled into his old job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Well, how about the guy who made
the counterfeit billion-dollar bills? I'm sure he isn't real busy right now, plus it adds another phony into the WH! Yeah, he'll do.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. ::ding::ding::ding::!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. "Re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" Chuck Schumer
Good one, Chuck. At least you're good for comic relief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. I loved that line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaygore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. I vote for pics of him with Jeff Gannon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Think Plame....think...Abramoff. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Who knows, since they hide so much.
I sure he fell on his sword to protect Little Lord Pissypants, from something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC