Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Iraq Memo Revealed: Colin Powell Opposed War Without Second U.N. R

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:57 PM
Original message
Another Iraq Memo Revealed: Colin Powell Opposed War Without Second U.N. R

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/28/new-iraq-memo/

Another Iraq Memo Revealed: Colin Powell Opposed War Without Second U.N. Resolution
The New York Times reported yesterday on a confidential January 2003 memo that showed President Bush “was determined to invade Iraq” even without a second UN resolution.

Yesterday on Hardball, the source of that memo, British author Philippe Sands, revealed the existence of yet another memo. The new document details a conversation between then-Secretary of State Colin Powell and UK Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, and “makes it clear that in Colin Powell’s eyes, if there wasn’t enough evidence for a second Security Council resolution, then there wasn’t enough evidence to justify the U.S. going it alone.” Watch it:



As Tiny Revolution notes, a May 2003 UK Guardian article reported on a transcript of a meeting between Powell and Straw in which the two discussed their doubts that WMDs existed in Iraq. The paper later agreed to retract portions of the story after Straw “made it clear that no such meeting took place.” It seems the Guardian was right after all.

transcript below:

SANDS:

<snip>

So Colin Powell was spot on, but it seems he was overridden by a president and others in the administration who were absolutely committed to taking the United States to war, tragically in erroneous circumstances, irrespective of what the inspectors found.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. So why the hell did he lie to the UN and go along with the warmongers??
Coward. He should have shouted his concerns regardless of the fallout. I hope he can't sleep at night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Fucking Crazies.
Colin Powell in four-letter neo-con 'crazies' row

Martin Bright
Sunday September 12, 2004
The Observer

A furious row has broken out over claims in a new book by BBC broadcaster James Naughtie that US Secretary of State Colin Powell described neo-conservatives in the Bush administration as 'fucking crazies' during the build-up to war in Iraq.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1302834,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was Powell telling Dem senators that war was last resort and assuring
Edited on Tue Mar-28-06 05:04 PM by blm
them that Bush would adhere to IWR guidelines on diplomacy and weapons inspections first.

Guess the Bushies snookered him. Too bad for the country he didn't share the truth once he realized they were lying to him, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Colin Powell has ZERO credibility after his U.N. performance....
Sorry, Powell is one of the war criminals. If he has reservations, too bad. He was one of the war pigs regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I agree 100%!
He was looking out for his and his son's money and he didn't give a damn about his country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tamyrlin79 Donating Member (944 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. What? Is Colin trying to Rehab his cred and rep?
Maybe he did object. Knowing Powell, I don't doubt it. But, that doesn't change the fact that he could have spoken up, objected, resigned in protest, etc. and otherwise alerted the public to what was going on. But he did not. He went and gave a fake speech at the U.N. paving the way to war.

Other than Bush and the neocons, there are two other people who aided and abetted this travesty of justice: Tony Blair and Colin fucking Powell. Sorry, but he's just not gonna be able to live that one down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Silence is consent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. If Powell had any integrity he would have resigned his office
if he opposed Bush's action immediately after the invasion. Cyrus Vance, Jimmy Carter's Secretary of State did just that after the failed attempt to rescue the Hostages in April, 1980 because he opposed the action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebaby3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. "In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the
silence of our friends." - Martin Luther King, Jr.

Shame on you Colin Powell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC