Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Finally Get Bold-Pass Censure of Feingold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
eauclaireliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:14 AM
Original message
Democrats Finally Get Bold-Pass Censure of Feingold
DEMOCRATS FINALLY GET BOLD — PASS CENSURE OF FEINGOLD
By Don Davis

In a rare show of unity, the Democratic Caucus, by near unanimous vote, has passed a Resolution censuring Senator Russell Feingold, for his proposed censure of the President for violating the FISA law.

Addressing the press in the Capitol Rotunda, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid stated that Senator Feingold had violated the Democrats’ 11th Commandment. Unlike the GOP’s 11th Commandment, which bans speaking ill of another Republican, the Democratic version strictly prohibits taking a principled stand, or exploiting any weakness in your opponent.

While one Democratic insider defended this tactic as “rope-a-dope” or “playing possum,” many grass-roots activists have expressed concern that it is more akin to “playing groundhog,” given the Democrats’ propensity to see their shadow, and then to disappear for six years.

The Democrats are also considering a censure of Senator John Kerry, for his vote AGAINST funding for the Iraq war (after he voted FOR it).

While these controversial moves have created a significant rift between Democratic politicians and the liberal blogosphere, there appears to be universal support to censure Senator Joe Biden, for his donning of a Princeton cap during the Alito hearings. An unnamed Democratic staffer confided that Senator Biden’s transparent attempt to hide his thinning hair ordinarily would have been overlooked, but that it constituted his second offense, counting his infamous “hair-plug” affair almost two decades ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. well, you almost got me--but even I could not believe Dems would be
this stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hate disinfo campaigns from within - even when disguised in bad humor.
Because the media won't report that most senators are pleased to have censure in committee where they are using it to force investigation, the knee jerks are out in full force condemning ALL Democrats for the remarks of the few the media found who dissented.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. pretty good humor, imo
and since I'm a complete joke, I should know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I had
a longtime relationship with one of the greatest humorists of the 20th century, so I guess I'm spoiled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. bob hope?
j/k :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hope was not a humor writer.
Edited on Wed Mar-29-06 01:23 PM by blm
He was a comic actor. He actually got his material from gag writers, like Sherwood Schwartz, pre-Gilligan days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And his material wasn't that good
at least imo. I can't stand one liners. And his one liners especially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. I could believe it.
If Democratic senators won't even "rush to judgment" about whether or not W's warrant-less domestic spying is illegal, and want to "go through the normal process" before coming to a position...I'd believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. gee what a dumb hoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalVoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. You had me up until....
"In a rare show of unity..." Democrats? Unified? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Now that is funny!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. If anyone was watching/listening to Senator Schumer this morning on C-Span
one would have to conclude that the humorist in the OP was rather prescient - in effect, that's just about what happened today on the Senate Floor, vis a vis Schumer's end run around Feingold's Censure Resolution, and his snarky remarks referencing Feingold and his resolution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Too sleepy to watch this morning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC