Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Number of Mumps Cases Swells Across Iowa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:55 PM
Original message
Number of Mumps Cases Swells Across Iowa
By MELANIE S. WELTE
Associated Press Writer

A mumps epidemic is sweeping across Iowa in the biggest outbreak in the country, puzzling health officials and worrying parents.

As of Thursday, 245 confirmed, probable or suspected cases of mumps had been reported to the Iowa Department of Public Health since mid-January. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said it is the only major outbreak in the nation.

'We are calling this an epidemic, not just an outbreak,' said Iowa state epidemiologist Dr. Patricia Quinlisk, explaining that mumps has spread to more than one-third of the state and does not appear to be confined to certain age groups or other sectors of the population.

Quinlisk said Iowa has had about five cases of mumps a year in recent years, and this is the first large outbreak in nearly 20 years.
More...
http://interestalert.com/story/siteia.shtml?Story=st/sn/03310006aaa04115.ap&Sys=rmmiller&Fid=NATIONAL&Type=News&Filter=National%20News

In the article it says some people who have been vaccinated are still getting this fairly common strain of mumps. I'm not sure what to think when you have enough cases of a disease break out to call it an epidemic and you still say you have a working vaccine that is effective 95% of the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. what are the ages of the victims?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. From the article
"mumps has spread to more than one-third of the state and does not appear to be confined to certain age groups or other sectors of the population."

My first thought was the vaccine had worn off and it was mainly hitting adults. The fact that it's all ages is what has me confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lot of mumps among the Amish around here...
however, this looks like it came from England. Interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You know how you tell the difference between English and American Mumps?
English Mumps infects the left testicle.

Chinese Mumps are the worst. An hour after you're cured, you feel like getting The Mumps again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. You are sooo bad
:spank: :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've had 'em. Those poor kids.
My brother was 'fortunate' enough to have the mumps and chicken pox at the same time.
My mom thought he was going to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. From the "OBVIOUS HEADLINES" collection!!
Number of Mumps Cases SWELLS--wow, I'll bet they stayed up half the night dreaming that one up, and then slapped their knee and chortled over their cleverness!!!

That said, it appears THIS is what has infected some of those rightwing crazies:

Mumps is a viral infection of the salivary glands. Symptoms include fever, headache, muscle aches and swelling of the glands close to the jaw. It can cause serious complications, including meningitis, damage to the testicles and deafness.

I mean, really, they are brain damaged, worried about what everyone else does with their sex organs (perhaps because their own are damaged?), and they can't hear a reasoned argument if it is shouted two inches from their crusty ears!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I laughed at the obviousness of the headline myself
I thought if I posted it more people would actually look at the article to see if I was the lame person who made it up. :)

You may be onto something in regards to the RW crazies.. :D :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. This makes you wonder who's checking up on the vaccines
It doesn't makes sense that all of a sudden there's a "new" strain of the mumps. There were companies this year selling saline solution as flu vaccine. It's possible that this scam has been going on for a long time with no one knowing about it. It'd be interesting to run some tests to see how many people really have been protected against measles/mumps/rubella. If you're thinking of getting pregnant, it might be good idea to request such a test since rubella can be devastating to an unborn child. Such tests were standard 20 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Worse, they're saying that it's a common strain of the mumps
From the article:

"The vaccine certainly was made to cover this particular strain, because it's a fairly common strain of mumps.' Quinlisk said the vaccine overall is considered about 95 percent effective."

Yet people who have been vaccinated are catching it. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Um, I never had them as a child, should I be worried about this?
Female, not having any more kids as an FYI

The whole family had them, I stayed in the house, never got them but I remember my poor father who was about 26 at the time got them, and they...ahem..."settled". I think I even have pictures of my poor dad laying in only his underwear, sick (Mom took them..those young pups and their cameras back then)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I doubt you should be worried
I wasn't trying to raise concern by posting this. I just wanted feel around to see if anyone wiser than myself could make sense of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terryg11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's strange
I didn't even know about it until the community college I'm taking a few courses at sent home a letter about it a few weeks ago. My wife, who's a lab tech. already knew about it but failed to inform me. If I remember correctly, you are susceptible unless you had both mumps shots rather recently. Will have to ask wifey again when she gets home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. ???? does mumps cause sterility in males?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well, it is a virus and they do mutate. Three possible factors:
The virus has found a way around the vaccine; the vaccine given to those children was defective, or they never actually got the vaccine.

I'll be interested in seeing the epidimiological data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC