Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So much for the "Good Faith" argument...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 08:22 AM
Original message
So much for the "Good Faith" argument...
“Secondly, there are such things as roving wiretaps. Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires — a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we’re talking about chasing down terrorists, we’re talking about getting a court order before we do so. It’s important for our fellow citizens to understand, when you think Patriot Act, constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland, because we value the Constitution.”

— President George Bush, April 20, 2004, in Buffalo, New York

http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002181.htm


Not only did the President illegally wiretap Americans on American soil, he lied about it. Now, if he lied about it, he knew he didn't have the inherent authority. So, how in the hell are Republicans now using the "Well, he thought he was obeying the law" argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Absolutely! He knew he was breaking the law...
Too bad that not even one Congressman knows the whole truth, yet they continue to defend him. They have no idea who he has spied upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. It doesn't matter because no one will enforce the law
We have a Congress comprised of a bunch of chicken shit wimps who will not do their jobs, and are in fact aiding and abetting this activity by knowing about it, and allowing it to continue. They are all as guilty as Bush. Every one of them, except for the handful who are trying to do something about it.

The rest should be voted out of office for not doing their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Don't forget the press...Republicans are lying about the lying and...
no one is calling them on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. We can thank Reagan for that
since he got rid of the Fairness Doctrine that mandated both sides of the story be told. I can't imagine how allowing one-sided reporting would benefit the American people. Of course, we now know there was more to it than that.

And as Ronnie was starting the process of removing our freedoms by allowing censoring, Alzheimers was starting the process of taking his life.

Karma is a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. He broke the law, knowingly. What he didn't know was that he
would be found out. Therefore, he blatantly lied about breaking the law. He thought he would get away with it because he didn't think we would ever find out. It all fits with his air of superiority and arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Feingold himself noted this in his DKos post...
Edited on Sat Apr-01-06 09:28 AM by Junkdrawer
The facts and the case for censure are clear. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, makes it a crime to wiretap American citizens without a court warrant - which is what the President has admitted doing. Before the program was revealed, he also misled Congress and the American people about the wiretapping that was being done. For example, at a 2004 speech in Buffalo, he said, "Any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires, a wiretap requires a court order." And at a 2004 speech in my home state of Wisconsin, he said that "the government can't move on wiretaps or roving wiretaps without getting a court order."


http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/3/13/114144/941

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-01-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. One last kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC