Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Taliban are stepping up attacks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 11:30 AM
Original message
The Taliban are stepping up attacks
Edited on Sun Apr-02-06 12:04 PM by icymist
Those nasty Taliban have struck again in two days! Not the rock band that George Bush originally thought the Taliban was as Mark Crispin Miller states in his book The Bush Dyslexicon. Maybe that's the reason George W. Bush turned his attention away from those who actually played a part in attacking the US. There are times when I do wonder if dropping the final defeat of the Taliban is, in fact, not incompetence, but deliberate neglect. Nevertheless, after two years from claiming that the Taliban were defeated, it would appear that a new spring offensive is under way. This attack came in an area where it has been reported that the Taliban are gaining money through opium. This is significant for it ties the Drug Lords into financing attacks on NATO forces. Omar himself is bragging about this offensive. Meanwhile, the Canadians need our prayer for hundreds of their troops have gone into harms way. Afghanistan is having a hot, bloody spring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. IMPOSSIBLE!!! 2 years ago, bush said "The Taliban are no more"
:eyes:

bush; stupidest MFing war criminal ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Bush allied himself with those who gave the Taliban refuge!
Edited on Sun Apr-02-06 01:17 PM by icymist
This in Pakistan and the area where, I suspect, Canadian troops are now advancing. Pretending that the Taliban are defeated will make the US look like fools to the world as we all discover that they are counter attacking. The blog Flogging The Simian is also cover this and Soj says:
But that's nothing new. What is new is the Taliban "teaming up" with drug warlords. Which is bitterly ironic since before the 2001 invasion, the Taliban had ceased all new heroin production to almost zero. And it's been three and a half years since the invasion and the Taliban still:

*Are getting instructions from their pre-invasion leader, Mullah Omar;
*Have a variety of spokespersons, who conduct interviews not only via telephone but sometimes via radio and even television;
*Run their own video production facilities, which broadcast pre-recorded shows on Afghan and Pakistani TV as well as via CD-ROMs for viewing on computers;
*Have enough armed members to conduct regular attacks against either Afghan troops/police or coalition troops. I estimate there is one Taliban attack every second day.

MORE
That was over a week ago and today marks the first day that the attacks are in two consecutive days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. mean while the right wing are haveing orgasms over
saddams ''documents''.

there are no weapons of mass destruction -- but there is plenty of intention, damn it!

and we all know how intention is dangerous when a country bombed into smithereens for what -- a decade -- is.

before the fall of the soviet union -- no right winger worth his salt would countenance the idea that a third world tin horn dictator was a threat to the most powerful country on planet earth.

and now because bushco has been so busy saying, yelling and demanding that everybody ''look over there'' -- the taliban are back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Indeed, the Taliban are back.
And why not? They have never been defeated. I sure hope to Bush that his fiasco in Iraq has been worth it to divert attention away from what the Congress decided to go to war for in the first place. Hey! You know what?! That 'war' was a failure! Anyone paying ATTENTION?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. I fixed the link about Omar bragging.
I'm just learning how to create links in text, please be patient with me. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ah, we're back to the Taliban....didn't we eliminate this scourge?
Boy, will this country EVER wake up???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Apparently, the Canadians are advancing to eliminate this scourge....
The Canadians left for the mountains north of Kandahar. This is an area of Afghanistan, way north, and close enough to Pakistan that mujahedeen camps have been created. If you remember, (sorry, I don't have a link for this) the mujahedeen were responsible for the raise of the Taliban in the first place; and out of Pakistan for that matter. The mujahedeen may in fact BE the government of the Taliban. The fact remains that in 2001, the United States Congress agreed to a war against those who attack us. In deflecting that agreement towards a non-relative pre-emptive war, I believe that agreement can be declared invalid. Meanwhile, those who did attack the US, I believe will try and attack again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. feh.... didn't folks pay attention to the year long buildup for Iraq
and the pullback of military resources (human, financial, technological, equipment) from Afghanistan to Iraq. That was the basis of Bob Graham's vote against the IRC - and the public shrugged. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC