Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New White House tactic: Let Bush Be Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AGENDA21 Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:32 PM
Original message
New White House tactic: Let Bush Be Bush
CRAWFORD, Texas (Reuters) - George W. Bush is taking time to explain himself, open up to the public in new ways and court the U.S. Congress as he tries to breathe life into a presidency beset by sagging ratings and influence.

With a job-approval rating under 40 percent, Bush, who went to his Crawford ranch for a quiet weekend, has a long way to go. Aides acknowledge it will take a while to rebuild his image, and much will depend on the outcome of the
Iraq war.

White House staffers, who have long limited the president's appearances to speeches and photo opportunities with little contact with regular people, are now inclined to let Bush be Bush.

He is talking at length. His March 21 news conference lasted nearly an hour. A Freedom House speech with questions from the audience in Washington on Wednesday went on for an hour and a half.

Bush even took questions from gray-haired retirees at a senior citizens' home recently and they asked some tough ones. More such sessions are planned.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060402/pl_nm/bush_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent idea, I think he should talk as much and as often as he likes.
Maybe, just maybe, people will start waking up to what he's really like. Just maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. and with no net
I can hear scottie-dog now... "no, when the president said he was attacking Iran he didn't mean it literally."

'the president didn't mean it literally when he said he's never made a mistake...'

'recent remarks about needing more Mexicans to do the work he wouldn't do shouldn't be taken literally....'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. But he's not a president that looks at the polls...
Lying again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. again?
they have announced the new tactic of letting Bush be Bush as many times as they've killed al Qaeda's #3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I thought so too..
definitely deja vu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. trouble with that is the people who voted for him because he was
the one they would most like to have a beer with..can't afford to buy the beer anymore. He'd have to buy and but it on the taxpayer's tab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. How much are we spending
to fly this chump to Crawford nearly every weekend? He seem to visit his ranch quite a bit and his entourage can't be cheap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush was also being Bush on his Social Security campaign...
Edited on Sun Apr-02-06 12:53 PM by stevietheman
Gee, Bush, how did that work out?

I just find it so hilarious that the White House sees the solution to their problems only through the prism of P.R., and that if Bush just yaps it up more, then his image will somehow be magically restored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh, please, sweet flipping Jesus, let Bush be Bush. In public.
There's only so much insolence he'll put up with from the serfs before he gets really snippy. Not even Helen Thomas snippy, I mean lip-snearingly mean with over a basic question that everyone outside the White House asks every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I'd pay to watch that ...
with maybe a cheney "go f**k yourself" thrown in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Recycled "Let Reagan be Reagan" mantra from Iran-Contra...
I remember so well (and sickeningly) that drumbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Really! What was it said in reference to? His falling asleep in meetings?
or what other goofy things did he do that needed apologists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. When public opinion was bouncing around in the bottom of the barrel
they would trot out, "We just need to let Reagan be Reagan", as if that would make everything just peachy again.

I was thinking about that over the last few weeks when the 'pubs started saying things about the fool just needing a "Reagan moment" at this stage of the disaster.

Like one of those Krishna chants where they just substitute a single word and it's a whole new chant.

Next we will probably hear "Let bush be raygun".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I remember it from the Reagan era too
Of course, the idea of letting Junior be someone else is more interesting. Maybe he could be Britney Spears...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Like this Britney Spears?

http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/03/29/late-nite-fdl-i-cant-take-it-any-more/

I think it will be more along the lines of "Let B*** be Reagan"

Yeah, that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Only if he did press conferences in that position
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
long_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. The first "let Reagan be Reagan" I remember was from his first
term and it was said by his looney tune Fundie Secretary of the Interior James Watt.

"Let ____ be ____" is a grand old political tradition. It orginated with the Roman senator who asked his fellow citizens to "let Caligula be Caligula." It did go out of fashion for a little while after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. In other words, set your expectations lower if they're not already in
the basement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Better tactic: Let Someone Else Be President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bush's "image" is entirely dependent on 9/11
That's all he ever had, really. That's why he still desperately clings to it and brings it up at every possible opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. True..
his approval was in the low 40's before 9/11.

September 12th 2001 his approval shot up to nearly 90% (without him actually doing anything).

It's been downhill (with a few bumps in the road) ever since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bad PR move
He'll stumble over his words, act like he doesn't know what he's atalking aobut (because he really doesn't know what he's talking about), will be unable to keep his lies straight and consistant and will say things that will be easily refuted (although one may have to go beyond the US corporate-owned MSM to find the refutation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. Will he be on his tricycle eating pretzels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. New White House tactic: Let Bush Clear Brush
You never know, it might just work. At least he seems to enjoy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why didn't he say "Let Clinton be Clinton" during Penisgate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC