Disclosed by the British in Jan 2004
Britain Says U.S. Planned to Seize Oil in '73 Crisis
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0102-01.htmthe plans then 'tweaked' to accomodate Iraq and please the Saudis. Plans now going awry. It would have made more strategic commonsense to go after another fuel source than to continue this charade. This has been going on militarily since Churchill's switching of the British navy from coal to oil at the turn of the 1800-1900's century.
The permanent bases are now well known to be the cause of Iraqi support for attacking US troops, since they view it as an occupation now
WPO Poll: Iraqi Public Wants Timetable for US Withdrawal, But Thinks US Plans Permanent Bases in Iraq
Half of Iraqis Approve of Attacks on US Forces, Including 9 Out of 10 Sunnis
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brmiddleeastnafricara/165.php?nid=&id=&pnt=165&lb=brmeFurthermore, it is seen here domestically in the US for what it is: the Quakers of all people have been spied upon for having the temerity to show those base sites on their website
"14 'Enduring Bases' Set for Iraq." Chicago Tribune. March 23, 2004. 4 Information on Iraq bases is from GlobalSecurity.org. More information is available ...
www.fcnl.org/iraq/bases.htm
Sadly, with WASTE being the hallmark of any DoD operation, someone will have to aply some reason into the Joint Chiefs of Staff's collective noggin's.