Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US bases in Iraq: a costly legacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 06:02 PM
Original message
US bases in Iraq: a costly legacy
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0403/p16s02-cogn.html

United States taxpayers have spent an inflation-adjusted $1 trillion to keep military bases in South Korea since the war ended there in 1953. Those bases remain in place, though they are shrinking.

Some military analysts wonder if 20 or so years from now the US will still have costly "enduring" bases in Iraq. ("Permanent" is a term the Pentagon generally avoids in referring to the hundreds of bases it has around the globe.)

So far, though, it seems clear that the Pentagon would prefer to keep its bases in Iraq. It has already spent $1 billion or more on them, outfitting some with underground bunkers and other characteristics of long-term bases. The $67.6 billion emergency bill to cover Iraq and Afghanistan military costs includes $348 million for further base construction.

When President Bush told the press March 21 that it will be decided by "future presidents and future governments of Iraq" when there will be no American forces in Iraq, his words intensified speculation that several of the approximately 75 bases in Iraq will remain occupied by US forces for an extended period.

Maybe not, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Planned since Nixon's '73 Saudi oil field seizures...
Edited on Sun Apr-02-06 06:25 PM by EVDebs
Disclosed by the British in Jan 2004
Britain Says U.S. Planned to Seize Oil in '73 Crisis
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0102-01.htm

the plans then 'tweaked' to accomodate Iraq and please the Saudis. Plans now going awry. It would have made more strategic commonsense to go after another fuel source than to continue this charade. This has been going on militarily since Churchill's switching of the British navy from coal to oil at the turn of the 1800-1900's century.

The permanent bases are now well known to be the cause of Iraqi support for attacking US troops, since they view it as an occupation now

WPO Poll: Iraqi Public Wants Timetable for US Withdrawal, But Thinks US Plans Permanent Bases in Iraq
Half of Iraqis Approve of Attacks on US Forces, Including 9 Out of 10 Sunnis
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brmiddleeastnafricara/165.php?nid=&id=&pnt=165&lb=brme

Furthermore, it is seen here domestically in the US for what it is: the Quakers of all people have been spied upon for having the temerity to show those base sites on their website

"14 'Enduring Bases' Set for Iraq." Chicago Tribune. March 23, 2004. 4 Information on Iraq bases is from GlobalSecurity.org. More information is available ...
www.fcnl.org/iraq/bases.htm

Sadly, with WASTE being the hallmark of any DoD operation, someone will have to aply some reason into the Joint Chiefs of Staff's collective noggin's.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC