Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Neocon claims Hatch was right - Bush can break any law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:12 PM
Original message
Neocon claims Hatch was right - Bush can break any law
Me: "You do realize that if Hatch were correct, Bush could break any law, right? ANY LAW. He could murder someone, rob a bank, rape someone, whatever he wants, so long as he verbally claimed it was for national security purposes, and according to Hatch, you couldn't even investigate the incident?"

Neocon: "Is it so strange ? Cannot diplomats do much the same thing ?"

Me: "You think that the President can murder, rape, and steal with no consequences?"

Neocon: "I did not say 'with no consequences'. The prez is ALWAYS subject to impeachment if his actions are thought to be illegal. There's your consequence."

========================================================

So, according to Neocons, Presidents are free to break any law they want to, and the only recourse is to Impeach if we feel its illegal, and then, I assume, prosecute criminally after Impeachment.

What this means, is that if Congress is unwilling to Impeach a President for breaking the law, that President can break the law without liability, without being held criminally responsible.

I am not sure that he is completely wrong according to the technical way in which the Presidency and Impeachment works. I believe a sitting President does enjoy immunity from all prosecution. But, if a crime is committed, Impeachment is the constitutionally dictated remedy, followed by criminal charges once Impeached.

However, what he is overlooking is the simple common sense result of that interpretation, which is a President that breaks laws without consequence. Obviously, we don't want that.

The NSA Spying fight is not a fight over whats legal and whats not legal. Its a fight over the powers we wish the Executive Branch to have. No matter if Bush's program is legal or not (and its not), it has to be deemed an overstep of his bounds, because the only check on his power, according to Neocons, is Impeachment. If he doesn't fear Impeachment, he has no limitations to his power.

This is the arguement we need to make to people so that REALLY understand the NSA Spying issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. what buffoon were you talking to ? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I cant mention the board name here.
But its a copycat of this site, where both sides can post.
Sort of a neutral zone, if you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Can break" means "is getting away with it."
The guy doesn't say what's right or wrong, what bothers him or doesn't, or what the congress SHOULD do nowadays. You could say the same about drug kingpins, or child rapists, as long as they aren't caught. It's profoundly amoral, and unAmerican, and anti-law, at worst, or a silly sophmoric evasion of a discussion of what the president should be doing, at best.

The Congress, by the way, can remedy ANY WRONG action by the president, whether or not illegal, by cutting his funding. Simple as that. Is your neocon friend in favor of cutting off funding for illegal programs, like the NSA spying? Get ready for more evasions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Bush Isn't Impeached, then the GOP Is Accomplice to the Crime
and they all get to spend a lot of time in orange jumpsuits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Do what you are told. Respect your elders. Respect your superiors.
Your place is identified by the rank they assign you.
You can only achieve rank through their approval.
You will never outrank them.
The Adults are in charge.
You don't know what they know so you are in no position to doubt them.
They can never be wrong.


Do what you are told. Respect your elders. Respect your superiors.


___You really do have to understand what is running through their head while you are talking. It is a form of brainswashing and yes it is based on the culture of the military_____
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC