http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_Doctrinehttp://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/teachers/lessonplans/iraq/powelldoctrine_short.html The questions posed by the Powell Doctrine:
* Is a vital national security interest threatened?
* Do we have a clear attainable objective?
* Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed?
* Have all other non-violent policy means been fully exhausted?
* Is there a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement?
* Have the consequences of our action been fully considered?
* Is the action supported by the American people?
* Do we have genuine broad international support?
The current debacle in Iraq seems to have violated every single aspect of the Powell doctrine.
Has America "unlearned" a previously learned lesson? Or was it never learned in the first place?
Has the Powell doctrine simply not been applied by mistake in this case, or has it been entirely rejected by Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush for this and any future war that they might supervise?