we are related, in particular, to mexico.
we have many citizens here who have relatives there -- not to mention that much of the u.s. was at one time mexico -- and not so long ago.
here is some reading you might find interesting.
and by the way -- high wage immigrants that come from say scandanavia also help to keep native born american wages in check. if one cares to think along those lines.
http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/Enc/Immigration.htmlThe Impact of Immigrants on Native Earnings
There are two opposing views about how immigrants affect the labor market opportunities of American natives. One view is that they have a harmful effect because immigrants and natives tend to have similar skills and compete for the same jobs, thus driving down the native wage. The other view is that the services of immigrants and natives are not interchangeable, but rather complement each other. For instance, some immigrant groups may be unskilled but particularly adept at harvesting crops. Immigration then increases native productivity and wages because natives can specialize in tasks for which they are better suited.
The first view is more likely correct. Economists who have rejected this view on the basis of evidence have looked at somewhat superficial data. These economists speculated that if the services of natives and immigrants are interchangeable, natives should earn less in cities where immigrants are in abundant supply, such as Los Angeles or New York, than in cities with few immigrants, such as Nashville or Pittsburgh. Although natives do earn somewhat less in cities that have large immigrant populations, the correlation between the native wage and the presence of immigrants is weak. If one city has 10 percent more immigrants than another, the native wage in the city with the most immigrants is only 0.2 percent lower.
i'm not a libertarian but this piece does some justice to dispelling the myth of ''illegal immigrants and wages.
http://www.lp.org/issues/immigration.shtmlIn 1989, the U.S. Department of Labor reviewed nearly 100 studies on the relationship between immigration and unemployment and concluded that "neither U.S. workers nor most minority workers appear adversely affected by immigration."
very detailed evidence about ''illegal'' immigration, over all wages continue to rise -- with of course complications in specific sectors.
http://are.berkeley.edu/courses/EEP39C/Immigration.htmhttp://www.nationalreview.com/ponnuru/ponnuru200603170753.aspAlmost all of the things that cause people to complain about illegal immigration are true of much legal immigration as well. If your worry is that illegal immigrants tend to raise government spending, for example, then you ought to be worried about legal immigrants, too. Half of legal immigrants have not gone past high school. Like illegal immigrants, they cost federal and state governments billions of dollars each year.
Or perhaps you’re concerned that illegal immigrants hurt low-income workers by driving low-end wages down. If so, you should be almost as concerned about legal immigration. Illegal immigrants tend to be paid less than legal immigrants, but the difference is small and largely reflects the fact that on average illegal immigrants have slightly less education than legal immigrants.
http://ehrenreich.blogs.com/barbaras_blog/2006/01/are_illegal_imm.htmlThe real shocker in the study is that 49 percent of the day laborers interviewed said they were regularly hired – not by contractors, companies of any kind, and certainly not “big corporations” – but by American homeowners. I’d just heard Bay Buchanan (sister of Pat) on Lou Dobbs’ show fulminating about the “big corporations” that are hiring all the illegal immigrants, but – surprise!—it’s the guy next door who needs his house painted or his lawn mowed.
http://www.newsbatch.com/immigration.htmfacts, figures and links on the immigration issue.