Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS finally jumped the shark (and couch)....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:19 AM
Original message
CBS finally jumped the shark (and couch)....

...by hiring Katie Couric for evening news anchor. What do you all think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think Katie can handle the hard news as well as fluff pieces. Whether
Edited on Wed Apr-05-06 10:21 AM by wordpix
or not she can actually dig up the news and will ask the questions that should be asked is another thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You're close to on your own then....
lol

Just out of curiousity: What in her past so much as suggests she has either the ability or the inclination to seriousness?

The glasses?

LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Really, I don't understand why people even care.
She's just a talking head
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. She Sure Is. Fuck Her. I Was Dan Rather, Period! (nr)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I NEVER watch "network news"..
Probably caught Jennings 2 or 3 times..Rather about the same.. and NEVER brokaw..

Judging by the fall odff in ratings, lots of people don't watch anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Sheiffer's ratings were WAY up...

...which tells me that people want a serious, experienced person doing the news -- not someone who helped Matt Lauer with his "Where in the World..." series.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Sheiffer wasn't a talking head

He had experience in the field, but had the knowledge and wisdom to know how to present material, etc. Katie will just read whatever is put in front of her and then go home. I don't like this development because it's just one more example of the breakdown of journalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
36. LOL. Just like a female Ron Burgundy!
She'll read ANYTHING on that teleprompter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. They'll have to redesign the set...
so she can continue to display her Manolo B. shoes.

It will be very hard to take Katie Couric seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lutefisk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. You are probably correct, sadly enough.
I haven't seen a morning show in at least 6 years, but isn't one of the conventions of those shows to display the legs and feet of the women on the show? If CBS starts using the peep show approach to the evening news, well, I just don't know what that means- but it's not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
43. Yes...
from what I've seen the legs, high-heeled shoes and perky smiles are the focus of the morning shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
44. I can't think of anyone from a morning entertainment show who should
be doing the evening news; they're all lightweights, and that's why they're doing cooking segments on morning TV! Some of my local anchor men and women would make better replacements, and that ain't saying much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Funniest line: "You'd think (pResident Shrub) had come out of the closet"
from Bernard McJERK on the sL-IMUS circus, referring to the big deal being made of the announcement. His first line was, "You'd think they had caught binLaden or something."

(Since my thread on this didn't go anywhere.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I am all done watching CBS - on to ABC
I just don't like Katie Couric - I can't even tell you why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just another nail in the coffin.
"News" from any mainstream outlet has been dead for nearly 10 years. Move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. News anchors are nothing more than narrators
All they have to do is look nice and read the teleprompter. The days of the anchor being an actual "journalist" died a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Not true..

Rather wasn't like that, Jennings wasn't like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Once, yes
But they're also both gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. bobbleheaded prompter-readers
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. But WHY did they do it?

WIth Sheiffer's ratings up, it would seem like they would get the hint that people want someone like that to deliver and vet the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. I'm sure they're going to argue "demographics"
The underestimation of the viewing public continues - I'm sure CBS executives are thinking "Gee, if we have a woman anchor, more women will watch!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #28
45. Wrong-o! I like to watch a handsome man *coughJohnRobertscough* myself!
And back in the day, Dan was The Man!! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
31. They are planning for the FUTURE..Schieffer is "old"
gray hair is OUT..blonde streaks and perky are IN.. Never mind the news.. they just want filler for between the commercials anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brazenly Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. It seems like a peculiar choice for the network of Murrow and Cronkite
But I haven't watched network news in so long, I have no idea just how far they've already strayed from real news reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
17. I hope they have a probationary peiod written into that contract
because I don't think she'll be able to make the transition from perky girl next door on a morning show to doing hard news at night. Her persona is all wrong for the job and I don't think she'll make the changes necessary to be acceptable to the evening audience.

It's Deborah Norville in reverse. Norville's persona was all hard news, and people used to Pauley's next girl persona rejected her quite vehemently. The same will be true of Couric. She's gonna bomb.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. I agree she's going to bomb..

I haven't heard one positive thing from anyone about her. WHy not Diane Sawyer, if they wanted a woman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. I think they need an accomplished Bush apologist news anchor
But how will Letterman handle it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. What's with Letterman and Couric?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Letterman has some great anti-* bits
Couric is a rabid Bush apologist, as is proven by her Today Show interviews. They're kinda like oil and water. Can Letterman make fun of her, I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skarbrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
20. I think it's a silly idea. She just isn't they type of person you want
Edited on Wed Apr-05-06 10:41 AM by Skarbrowe
your major nightly news from. But, maybe they realize the usual nightly news set-ups are on the wane. Why not put a cutzie feather weight in what was once one of the most important news slots in the country? So many other people could have filled this slot. I really like Lester Holt from NBC as a news reader if that's all they wanted. I would have watched him every night. How about Christiane Amanpour? Not that she would want the job.

A lot of people are getting their news from cable or the internet.

For people who don't use either of those, it looks like Brian Williams, unfortunately, will get better ratings than ever.

edited for mispelling someone's name I should never mispell..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. Absolutely NO credibility. I can't imagine why she was chosen.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
25. I used to watch CBS news
but I refuse to watch an airhead..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Guy Donating Member (875 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
26. Jon Stewart would have been better
Even Bill Maher would be more credible than Katie Couric. *shrug* I seldom watch network news anyway. I get 95% of my news from the 'net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
29. What do I think?
I think we're a long, long way down the hill from Edward R. Murrow - or Dan Rather for that matter. CBS News must just be tired of all the fact-checking, fairness, honesty and all that other junk that needs to be in place to have a news operation. They're just gonna have Katie do a cutesie-patriot act every night and try to forget about that other shit.

The problem is, Katie ain't that cute and Katie ain't that patriotic. She's just a personal shill for the Bushes. Not to mention that any way you slice it, she's not much of a journalist. Wouldn't it be great if that mattered?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. I can't imagine her
doing a tough story on 60 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
32. I think this is a disastrous move for CBS. Ratings boost short-lived.
John Roberts would have been a much better choice.

There isn't a person in the world who can take Katie Couric seriously as a journalist or a broadcaster...except for Katie Couric.

There will be a ratings boost of the gawking-at-a-car-accident variety..and then I predict a serious slide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigluckyfeet Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #32
47. John Roberts has Moved to
CNN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
33. she will make a great newsbunny!
isn't that what they want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
34. sing along ya'll ...
...
We can do the innuendo, we can dance and sing
When it's said and done we haven't told you a thing
We all know that crap is king
Give us dirty laundry


dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
35. Until she can prove otherwise, I can't see Katie:
1. on the proverbial rooftops of London during a Blitzkrieg;

2. in the jungles of Vietnam or Cambodia during a guerilla attack;

3. on a tank rolling through the deserts of Iraq with the military;

4. in New Orleans minute-by-minute, waiting for a Category 5 hurricane to hit;

5. getting in the face of the President when he refuses to answer a probing question (stonewalling) to the point where he prematurely ends the interview;

6. being able to get the raw news, analyze it, write it, rewrite it, edit it, and read it without a prompter b/c she created it from scratch that she knows it like her personal history.

Etc. This is a celebrity broadcaster, folks. This is not a journalist. This is not a promotion from being a cub reporter who started by covering meetings of the zoning board in a Pekon, Illinois. This is someone who has the likeability and clout to make people believe whatever the corporation behind the network wants viewers to believe.

That's all. If that's the criteria, they did as well as they could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #35
46. Except I think they'll find that KC's "likeability" quotient is zero.
It was the "Today Show" that people watched, some, perhaps many, out of habit.
NOT Katie Couric.
IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
37. Vapid comes to mind nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
38. Unfortunately - it's all about perception
Even if Katie can handle real news, she will always be seen as the cute, giggly hostess of the Today Show. I really have no interest in watching her perform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
39. Well, no more CBS for moi........didn't really watch before,
caught sometimes, but now NEVER WILL WATCH CBS AGAIN!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
40. It'll be really fun to see their viewer numbers hit the toilet.....
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lena inRI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
41. So who wants to know. . .
that you're asking for? A lot of leading posts on this board make me very suspicious of the posters, pumping info out of us for their own advantage. What a sneaky game.

If you REALLY want to know MY OPINION on CBS Nightly News. . .

~network news is irreversibly dying ever since the multidimensional-cross referencing Internet proved to be a far better news source during the past 5 years of major Network-whoring for B* & Company.

~generationally, cyberkids spend more time in front of their computers for info and when they do watch the tv, it's for sheer escapism (American Idol, etc.). . .so no amount of "lightening up" the Nightly News with Couric will matter.

~technologically, the tv will die off (even with the Tivo recording gimmick) because the daily habits of the masses are shifting from "passive viewing place/mode" to "interactive mobility selection" so there goes the "6 pm watch-the=news-routine."

Bye. . bye. . network news and GOOD RIDDANCE. . .YA LYING FILTHY BASTARDS!

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonReign2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
42. Ahh great
Meg Ryan will now be doing a nightly newscast? Or do I have my perpetually perky gals mixed up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
48. more entertainment and more dumbing down of America..i couldn't
stand her on Today..i could not watch her then and will not watch her now!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC