My God, 9/11 was a controlled demolition now! I just can't believe I saw that. That wasn't photoshopped or anything? (The author of the pages doesn't appear to be claiming that 9/11 was planned, so they probably weren't photoshopped.) I mean that seals the deal for me. I never believed all of those nut cases, but after seeing that I think I am 90% sure that it was a controlled demolition. I love physics, and I think it is interesting to note, that if there were charges that cause those puffs of smoke, they look to be near (though still somewhat higher) the area where the other plane impacted the other tower. This could have meant the pilot was supposed to crash further down, to mask any explosive charges or their dust clouds. It is possible, however, that a support column could no longer handle the stress placed on it, and it gave way before the others. I think the very striking thing to note is that the distribution of the smoke puffs is in a regular patter. I don't not think this would happen if it was simply a few columns giving way before their counterparts (at their floor level) because the stress on the columns shouldn't be symmetrical because the impact of the plane was not. Plus, the columns on the side near where the plane entered the building should have given way first. They would have been under the most stress. Not the columns on the other side, away from the planes entry point.
The standard practice of a controlled demolition is to detonate charges on the lowest floors, and in such a pattern that the center of the building fails first, then explode charges on the outside. I want independent verification of this. I think this is such damning evidence that we need to gather all available pictures and video. My goodness, I am sorry to all those people I may have called a nut for saying that the buildings were brought down by things other than structural steel failing.
Here is a website with tons of controlled demolitions on it, see for yourself. I really think this was planned beforehand.
I don't know if this places guilt upon the government or the President, but it does mean that the structural steel theory is wrong. It is still very possible that someone in al-Qaeda could have planted charges. Gosh, I wish there were people who worked near those floors, who have survived. They may have seen something out of ordinary. I don't really think they would remember after such a traumatic experience though. This stuff convinces me something is right with the current explanation.
Here is that website, with a ton of controlled demolitions:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/video/