Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the Cynthia McKinney incident being overblown by the media?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 09:44 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is the Cynthia McKinney incident being overblown by the media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's with a freakin' grand jury
What are they doing, playing "fitz"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. With all due respect ...
The notion that Ms McKinney can command media attention at will is amusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AFFIRM Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Grateful yet Scared
Once again we hear so much evidence of the Republican misuse of power. I am, as are many in this great nation of ours, grateful to finally "hear" opposition to this egregious culture of corruption. As you will remember, during the first few years of the current administration, nearly no one spoke out against this Republican 'Ring of Power.' Those who did, were so publicly humiliated that they often lost their very livelihood. I am reminded of The Dixie Chicks for some reason here.

It is with a great gratitude that I now hear the media openly willing to challenge this President and his cronies in Congress. It would indeed appear that an increasing majority of this nation is now beginning to open its eyes to see our current leadership for the sham that it is. However, it is with great fear that I view the upcoming elections in November. In this day and age of integrity challenged election results, how can we possibly be assured of seeing accurate responses of the public in any race? It matters not whether the truth be known by the public if their political responses are somehow gerrymandered by incumbents.

Preceding the 2000 election, national attention was focused on integrity of the chief executive as we had all been embarrassed by a Presidency that was rendered no longer effective because of having an affair in the oval office. In 2004, our attention was sneakily diverted to issues of gay marriage. I say sneakily because although not one member in the press was willing to stand up and address this foul play, the truth was, not one democratic incumbent or challenger had suggested the we nationally legalize gay marriage. It was indeed a diversion from allowing us to focus on the real issues that were beginning to plague the Republican Party.

Now here we are in 2006, seven months away, focusing on immigration issues that were solved years ago. What we are not seeing perhaps here, is the fact that ever since this President took office, these laws written in the 1990's have been less and less enforced. Thus giving the perception that they aren't working.

Every single democratic incumbent in both houses of Congress owes every citizen of this nation one thing over and above anything else at this grave hour. You owe us a national debate on our election system. Although I for one, am not suggesting an overhaul, it is indeed imperative that we have a verified, secured system of polling in place come November. A system that can reasonably guarantee us election results with integrity.



P.S. The above text is certainly not copy written so please feel free to repost this anywhere in which you believe it might be seen by the right eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. the fact that even here in DU--this incident is apparently receiving FAR
more coverage than the resignation of bugman, or the arrest of that alleged perv from DHS says something about the level of manipulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What is stark is the difference in polls and the number of anti-McKinney..
threads.

As has been said, Republicans always over-reach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC