Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, why did we have 3 sexual predators working at DHS?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:28 PM
Original message
So, why did we have 3 sexual predators working at DHS?
One is a fluke, two is a problem, three is a pattern.

Where is the investigation? Where is the wall to wall TV coverage?

Oh, I forgot, Cynthia was not wearing her button.

:shrug:

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/04/3rd-homeland-security-employee-in.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hiding in plain sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Three that we know of. So far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. remember scooter's book that had a little girl being raped by a bear
to train her to be a hooker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because all the jobs at the White House were filled???
Sorry. Poor taste. But, I couldn't resist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. And remember: no civil service at DHS.
Bush insisted that there not be any civil service rules at DHS, so he could hire the very best. His hires, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. I did not remember that. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. probably more of them in the white house?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Funny thing is, DHS busted my old neighbor for child porn!
He got nabbed in a DHS sting. Don't get me wrong, it's a heinous crime and he needs to serve time...but is chasing down child pornographers what DHS was formed for? How about our ports?

If BushCo wanted another investigative agency, why not just call it that and spare us the pretext of "protecting the homeland"?

Now, predators are actually running the DHS. Just marvelous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Guess it takes one to know one.
Pee Wee's Guide to Public Policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. That's not a pattern.
There's probably 3 working at the EPA, the FBI, or the DNC. In any large group of people, there's a certain percentage of predators. I'm actually surprised that this was prosecuted instead of being hushed up. Good for the local police!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because it is a Republican administration?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is it too tinfoil to NOT be surprised?
Boys Town, Gannon/Guckert, now this?...

Nahhhh... none of that ever happened, never mind, carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Because they are professional peeping toms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Innocent until proven guilty...remember Scott Ritter ?
Edited on Wed Apr-05-06 10:42 PM by EVDebs
CRIMENETDAILY
Ritter's attorney
confirms arrest
TV station claims tape shows ex-U.N. inspector caught in sex sting
Posted: January 20, 2003
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30587

It seems if you criticize the Bush administration these kinds of charges suddenly appear. Maybe these DHS people are guilty of the charges, maybe not, no trials have been held yet, just news reports.

If there IS an investigation on this kind of activity, I would suggest DUers investigate an old stale file that Congressman Charlie Rose once tried, unsucessfully, to investigate called The Finders. This was apparently a group of pedophiles involved in the 'intelligence community' who were never brought to justice. Someone apparently covered for them.

Whether this story from the web is true or not, here it is:


The Story of the CIA's "Finders" Abduction Operation
The CIA Traffics in Drugs, Child Ritual Sexual Abuse, and Global Murder
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/ciadrugsabusemurder.shtml

""The many unanswered questions about the Finders case now have Democratic Rep. Charlie Rose of North Carolina, chairman of the House Administration Committee, and Florida's Rep. Tom Lewis, a Republican, more than a little exercised. "Could our own government have something to do with this Finders organization and turned their backs on these children? That's what all the evidence points to," says Lewis. "And there is a lot of evidence. I can tell you this: We've got a lot of people scrambling, and that wouldn't be happening if there was nothing here.""

It does beg the question, what the hell is going on at the CIA ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Only three?
Remember, Republicans tend to hire their partners in crimebuddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Who better to protect the "Homeland"?
When it comes to handling natural disasters, coping with undocumented aliens, and fighting the war on terror, perverts are our first line of defense. The straight heterosexual incompetents are our second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Cronyism? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. I betcha there's a hell of a lot more than THREE there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. they aced the willingness to violate others' rights part of the test
Edited on Wed Apr-05-06 11:26 PM by leftofthedial
and the aptitude for engaging in torture that is now assessed for all prospective federal employees

and they passed the must-believe-in-jeebiz part of the application

no one could have predicted that pedophiles would apply for jobs in the executive branch of the bush administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. What, exactly, has the DHS accomplished, so far, if anything?
Edited on Wed Apr-05-06 11:57 PM by Mayberry Machiavelli
Aside from obstructing volunteer efforts in the Gulf, lameass meaningless color code warning system, and duct tape/tuna fish?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
21. a threesome?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC