Edit - bad idea. DELETE!
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:46 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 11:51 AM by helderheid
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
|
It could be construed as a bribe. Nice thought though.
|
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
|
You don't reward a prosecutor for doing their job.
It taints the process.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
|
We don't want him getting distracted and stuff!
|
Buddyblazon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
this is most certainly his job.
It would look fishy.
|
Sequoia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
5. No, another flower. Somehting stalky and manly. |
|
Roses are for women. (Flame war...ouch)
|
Jawja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
but wouldn't it make his investigation appear partisan? We don't need to give anybody any ammunition.
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
7. On 2nd thought - roses for Fitzgerald AFTER the impeachment. |
janx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
And a wonderful idea, by the way.
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
8. respectfully, I object |
|
It's one thing for a politician or an opinion commentator to receive gifts of appreciation from groups of citizens who are banded together by partisan interests. It's quite another to think of sending gifts of appreciation to law enforcement officials.
Please don't. It can be used against us in the court of public opinion.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Wait until he finishes the investigation and hands out indictments. |
|
Don't jump the gun on this one. It could embarrass him if done prematurely.
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
10. For what? Nothing has happened yet.... |
bleever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
12. I'm not sure a public gesture is appropriate... |
|
because his work needs to be seen as non-partisan, in a way that Helen's and Barbara Boxer's doesn't.
Still, I would like to kiss him (on the cheek, of course).
:)
|
terip64
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
13. I don't think so either. |
stellanoir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
14. We're gonna start to call you rosey dear |
|
hope you're listening to HT right now on AAR. Betchya she's gonna mention the roses.
We'll send thousands of dozens to him upon the indictments and convictions though if he can somehow circumnavigate Gonzales it'll be okay. Tough one though. It anyone can Fitz can do it though. He's thankfully such an ace.
|
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message |
15. There was a post on DU that $17.76 should be given to his |
|
progressive web site. Don't have the link. This is what I did.
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Not Fitzgerald. But the contribution was appreciated nonetheless.:)
|
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Thanks. My eyes were reading something different. I've been thinking |
|
a lot about Feingold lately and read what I wanted.
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-06-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Just wanted to clear it up that we weren't advocating sending money to a Federal Prosecutor.:)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.