Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LINKS for all 3 PDF COURT DOCS from FIBBY'S 04/05/06 filing(s) - HERE!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 11:51 AM
Original message
LINKS for all 3 PDF COURT DOCS from FIBBY'S 04/05/06 filing(s) - HERE!!!
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 11:51 AM by stop the bleeding
Enjoy! myself and another DU'er(Dunvegan) helped put this together





MEMORANDUM OPINION as to I. LEWIS LIBBY; Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 4/5/06. (erd) (Entered: 04/05/2006)

http://www.iforensics.org/du/show_case_doc_01.pdf - 13 pgs




ORDER granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion To Bar Ex Parte Submissions as to I. LEWIS LIBBY (1);Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 4/5/06. (erd) (Entered: 04/05/2006)

http://www.iforensics.org/du/show_case_doc_02.pdf - 2 pgs



RESPONSE by USA as to I. LEWIS LIBBY re 68 Third MOTION to Compel DISCOVERY UNDER RULE 16 AND BRADY (Kedian, Kathleen) (Entered: 04/05/2006)

http://www.nysun.com/30561.pdf - 39 pgs





Tear them up DU - see what we can get out of these that already hasn't been picked up by the MSM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. No time to tear them up today, but I do have time for a K and R.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks, stb!
I've been looking. I found Doc 80 at the end of the Sun article, but couldn't find the others.

Here's my take: They aren't saying Bush told Libby specifically to leak the info, they're saying that Bush wanted the info leaked. Thus, the two seemingly contradictory statements from Faux News aren't really so contradictory.

"There was no indication in the filing that either Bush or Cheney authorized I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby to disclose Valerie Plame's CIA identity."

"Before his indictment, Libby testified to the grand jury investigating the Plame leak that Cheney told him to pass on the information and that it was Bush who authorized the leak, the court papers say. According to the documents, the authorization led to the July 8, 2003, conversation between Libby and New York Times reporter Judith Miller."

Am I right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Libby testified that he was authorized to leak the NIE to Miller. He had
also testified that he couldn't have possibly discussed Plame's identity to Miller on July 8 because big Timmy hadn't told him about her identity yet. He "forgot" he had learned her identity in June from Administration sources, he "forgot" the Plame portion of his July 8 meeting with Miller (and "forgot" to mention that they had met on June 23 and he'd discussed Wilson's wife) and "forgot" that in his discussion with Timmy, Plame was not discussed.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. I have no doubt he was authorized to leak the info
nor do I doubt he knew what he was doing while he was doing this and lied to cover his butt and the administration's (oops, it didn't work!).

What I see from this new info, where the news is that Libby said Bush okayed the leak, is that Bush didn't say, "Scooter, get out there and leak this". That was Cheney. Bush told Cheney, and maybe Libby, that he wanted this out there. Cheney then said, "Scooter, you're up". The new info here is that Bush was actually involved (which we all suspected) and now there's something on the record to that effect.

But, then again, I'm only on page 3 of the .pdf. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I always enjoy your
analysis,

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bookmarked, K&R, and printing docs
:woohoo:

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks, stb and Dunvegan! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. MSNBC is saying that they authorized leaking of classified info to
Woodward too!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thank you so much for these.
You're the best.:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. thank you! k&r we need to keep the heads talking about this. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why today do I have to work?
I've only had a chance to get half way through the 39-page Response. I'll try to get back later. Thank you, thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. LOL! I could say the exact same thing on all accounts from your post
and I just got more work dropped on me.

What a day.

BTW - I look forward to your take on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I've got to cancel some appointments...
Enjoy, and I look forward to more of your comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'll be reading these tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thank you!
Been looking for this to pop up. Thanks so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. KICKETY
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. Again, the money 'graph from Waas' article is this:
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 12:51 PM by kpete
Again, the money 'graph from Waas' article is this:

The former senior official said in an interview that he believed that the attempt to conceal the contents of the one-page summary were intertwined with the efforts to declassify portions of the NIE and to leak information to the media regarding Plame: "It was part and parcel of the same effort, but people don't see it in that context yet."

The evidence is this:

Two days after Wilson's op-ed, Libby met with then-New York Times reporter Judith Miller and not only disclosed portions of the NIE, but also Plame's CIA employment and potential role in her husband's trip.

Same effort, same ass-covering, same intel issue, same leak.

http://www.haloscan.com/comments.php?user=atrios&comment=114434212784119516

and:
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/arch...ives/ 000303.php

'Murray Waas scoops the NY Sun's scoop from this morning. Court docs show Libby had permission for one leak of national secrets; Waas says VP Dick Cheney directed Libby to leak all over the place, including to the WPost's Bob Woodward'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. nice work stb, thanks for posting this!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. "This is a criminal matter. It's a serious matter,"
No spin, just plain truth, thank you very much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. He Lied to America!
kicking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. Thanks stb! K, R & B!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trevelyan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. Good work! K&R FireDogLake posters say that NYSun site keeps crashing
because of high traffic!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
24. What we have here, is a Rogue President.
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 01:49 AM by countryjake
Here's Larry Johnson's explanation of the lead-up to the leaking:

http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/04/george_w_bush_r.html

"By the summer of 2003, it was clear that the skeptics in the intelligence community were right. So, what did our fearful leader do? According to Scooter Libby, President Bush ordered him to spread disinformation with the press. The President tried to cherry pick intelligence and feed the line to gullible reporters that Joe Wilson's claim about Iraq's efforts to acquire uranium from Niger was wrong.

What we now know, without any shadow of doubt, is that Joe Wilson's version of events, namely, that Iraq had not tried to obtain yellowcake uranium in Niger, was accurate. In fact, the CIA had to recant on the President's 16 words in the State of the Union address, which claimed the opposite was true.

Today's revelation is simple and riveting--the effort to smear Joe Wilson went to the very top of the White House. This was not an operation of rogue political operators. Instead, we have a rogue President. If we can impeach a President for lying about a blow job from an intern, the time has come to impeach a President from giving the American people a line of bullshit about Iraq used to justify a war that has left almost 2400 American soldiers dead. George Bush did not leak to protect America. He leaked to cover his ass. That, my friends, is the definition of a coward."


(Edited to fix permalink)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
25. nysun.com document: PAGE 26-27 - check this out....
Defendant’s request for discovery to show an absence of motive to lie or conceal his conduct overlooks the fact that even the materials defendant appended to his motion show that in early October 2003 (when defendant first gave his story) there would be great embarrassment to the administration if it became publicly known that defendant had participated in disseminating information about Ms. Wilson’s CIA employment, and defendant would have had every reason to assume he would be fired if his true actions became known. Then National Security Adviser Dr. Condoleeza Rice publicly stated that she knew “nothing of any such White House effort to reveal any of his, and it would certainly not be the way the president would expect his White House to operate.”


These documents are sweet. :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
26. Bookmarked. Thank you!
If You're pro-Bush, You're Anti-America - and you dig traitors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC