Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm confused about the new "leak" story.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:15 PM
Original message
I'm confused about the new "leak" story.
Bear with me because I'm at work and am just checking in now and then. I've been glancing over the latest stories about the leak investigation and I'm not sure I'm getting it. My question is this:

Libby has said that Cheney said that Bush said that it was OK to leak...what exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. libby said cheney said bush said
that it was okay to leak "INFORMATION" but so far the news reports don't say if it was specific info or just "leak whatever you need to"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Thanks.
I was afraid that there was some specific information being referred to that I wasn't understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. libby took that
to mean he could leak Valerie plame's status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Libby took that to mean...
Or is that how they are going to spin it? You know, Libby was acting on his own based on his OWN interpretation of Bush's instructions? Hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're falling quickly behind
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 01:21 PM by monarch
It's MUCH better than that! Postings go back at least (at least they did when I started posting) to page two of the comments. Fitzmas for sure!

ON EDIT: punctuation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chimp supposedly gave Chainy a genreal instruction to release clasified
information if would build the case to go to war with Iraq. Chainy and libby discussed this and additionaly talked about Blame. Libby decided to leak the information to Bob Woodward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Wowo Woodward is in on this?
That slime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Self-deleted
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 01:29 PM by Seen the light
Delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. No specifics yet about what exactly he was authorized
to leak. The big news is that he WAS apparently authorized to leak info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. He was authorized to leak info in the National Intelligence Estimate
From Waas' article....

I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby testified to a federal grand jury that he had received "approval from the President through the Vice President" to divulge portions of a National Intelligence Estimate regarding Saddam Hussein's purported efforts to develop nuclear weapons, according to the court papers. Libby was said to have testified that such presidential authorization to disclose classified information was "unique in his recollection," the court papers further said.

http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0406nj1.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Triple leaks--as in 3 per Waas, here


http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0406nj1.htm


ADMINISTRATION
Libby Says Bush Authorized Leaks
By Murray Waas, National Journal
© National Journal Group Inc.
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff has testified that President Bush authorized him to disclose the contents of a highly classified intelligence assessment to the media to defend the Bush administration's decision to go to war with Iraq, according to papers filed in federal court on Wednesday by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case.

I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby testified to a federal grand jury that he had received "approval from the President through the Vice President" to divulge portions of a National Intelligence Estimate regarding Saddam Hussein's purported efforts to develop nuclear weapons, according to the court papers. Libby was said to have testified that such presidential authorization to disclose classified information was "unique in his recollection," the court papers further said. ...


The White House had no immediate reaction to the court filing.

Although not reflected in the court papers, two senior government officials said in interviews with National Journal in recent days that Libby has also asserted that Cheney authorized him to leak classified information to a number of journalists during the run-up to war with Iraq. In some instances, the information leaked was directly discussed with the Vice President, while in other instances Libby believed he had broad authority to release information that would make the case to go to war.

In yet another instance, Libby had claimed that President Bush authorized Libby to speak to and provide classified information to Washington Post assistant managing editor Bob Woodward for "Plan of Attack," a book written by Woodward about the run-up to the Iraqi war. ......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. see Waas article below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. you mean above and Waas is right about 3 kinds of leaks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Corporation said: go with the leak story, not the immigration story
UPDATE 1-U.S. Senate strikes deal on immigration bill
Thu Apr 6, 2006 11:54 AM ET

WASHINGTON, April 6 (Reuters) - U.S. Senate leaders on Thursday announced a bipartisan compromise on an overhaul of U.S. immigration laws, giving some illegal immigrants a path to citizenship and creating a temporary worker program.

"I think we're looking like we may be able to dance this afternoon," Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada told reporters.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Tennessee Republican, appeared with Reid and said "We have a great opportunity to deliver to the American people what they expect, what they deserve," a comprehensive border security and immigration reform bill.

The deal, which would include a temporary worker program backed by President George W. Bush, would allow illegal immigrants who have been in the United States more than five years a chance to become citizens if they meet a series of requirements and paid a fine. Other rules would apply to people in the country less than five years.

http://tinyurl.com/ojf5d
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. You have to admit
The leak story is a bit more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm not sure about that.
The immigration story affects more people, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. So you think it is more important than
the possiblity that bush may have to resign or he will be impeached for breaking the law?

I don't. Are you old enough to remember Watergate? Life as we know it stopped while those hearings were being held. Nothing else really mattered. And this is a MUCH WORSE offense than what Nixon did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Worse than ordering a burglary of the opposition's headquarters?
This is worse in the national security sense, but it isn't nearly as sexy. This could be swept under the rug.

But 26 million people could have the opportunity to become American citizens because of the immigration bill. It's a very big deal.

Whether or not this NIE leak authorization thing will pan out remains to be seen. I'm not convinced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. Millions of people probably think Scooter Libby is a video game character
And NO ONE is surprised to hear that Bush might be involved in something wrong, bad, illegal, or just plain nasty. What's he polling at lately? 28%? 20%?

Are you surprised by the court filing saying Bush OK'd a leak on Iraq?
No 82%
Yes 18%
Total Votes: 81,110
http://articles.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20060406121209990007

The immigration reform IS the news of the day. Significantly newsworthy given that massive street protests forced politicians to shit themselves.

Hasn't happened since Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
41. The media don't have to cover only one important story
One important story will be covered at the expense of another important story only if it suits the owners of the MSM (General Electric etc).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. The NIE.
This was information from the National Intelligence Estimate that supported the idea that saddam had attempted to acquire the components for nuclear weapons. It is not about Plame's identity. However, it shows that the president was more deeply involved in the controversy than previously admitted by any administration source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. is whatever he purported to have declassified, been reclassified?
Do we have any idea if anyone outside of the WH knew it was declassified? Whole thing sounds like a long after the fact set of fabricated explanations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Go to pages 27-28
of Fitzgerald's document. It should clear up this question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. It sounds like he (Libby) is being accused of after the fact
trying to find documents that would suggest the info was not classified (from the two pages you suggest)... Am I reading this correctly? So implication is that he then glombs onto the NIE and suggests that bush had declassified it? (I haven't read the whole thing, I admit.) Sounds like a hunting job and then some not necessarily well documented claims made by Libby that don't necessarily indicate whether or not Bush actually had declassified the info. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Waterman -
As reported by Truthout - NEI contained annex versions of the INR to refute Uranium claims,

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:NHDd0tgo-ikJ:www.truthout.org/docs_2005/102005A.shtml+NIE+INR+libby+plame&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2


according to Roger Morris - Plame's status was contained in the INR

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:RajaUXFaeDcJ:www.counterpunch.org/morris07272005.html+Rice+on+Air+Force+one+to+Africa&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=13

Both documents were being used/leaked at the same time by the same people, how much of a stretch is it for Plame's status to be part of the altered version of the NIE? Especially after reading the Court Docs today that shows this leaking was in rebuttal of Wilson's attacks.


How much of a stretch is that Plame's status was leaked while discussing the NIE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. and this about NIE vs INR footnotes - very interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. I found it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Sure it was.
I'm not questioning that. I am pointing out that, according to Fitzgerald, the president was okaying the release of specific information. The last paragraph on page 27 addresses this. I am not disagreeing with the idea that Cheney was instructing Libby to go for broke. And it is clearly worth asking, "What did the president know? And when did he know it?" But it is important not to make Fitzgerald's document say more than it does.

PS: look for an e-mail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Yep - Fitz did not state that in the filing but one could infer based
on what was said, who said it, and why they said it, also begs the question of where did they get their information from. I am trying to establish a direct link to the NIE and Plame's covert status via the INR

more here from Waas's earlier March article on NIE vs INR

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:EebArASO0swJ:news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0330nj1.htm+NIE+INR+libby+plame+Ari&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. call me dense - I have read that twice and I don't see it?
I see the plea by Libby to have a statement exonerating him, and I then see a looser exoneration than was requested given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Waterman - last paragraph of page 27 - 1st sentence
does this language sound like Fitz is saying that Hadley or Rice outed Plame?????

"During this time, while the President was unaware of the role that the VP's Chief of Staff(Libby) and Nat. Sec. Advisor (Rice or Hadley?) had in fact played in disclosing Ms. Wilson's CIA employment,...."

What is your take on this??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. Plame info was leaked to Miller when Libby met her to discuss NIE.
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 02:55 PM by Garbo 2004
This was July 8, when Libby said he was authorized to tell her about the NIE. Libby denied telling her about Plame, but Judy was tired of being in the slammer and talked.

Libby couldn't very well testify that he was authorized to leak Plame's identity when he was claiming to Fitz/grand jury that he didn't know Plame's identity at the time (or didn't remember that he knew) and didn't leak it. It was all about the NIE, he said, at that July 8 meeting with Miller.

But Libby also neglected to mention to them a June 23 meeting where he discussed Wilson's wife with Plame. Judy also didn't intially mention that meeting but had a case of "recovered memory" after Fitz encouraged her to go back and refresh her memory about her dealings with Libby. (Fitz knew they had met in June. If my memory serves, her name was on a sign in sheet in the Old Executive Office building where Libby's office was.)

No doubt Libby indeed was authorized for the whole boatload, Plame's identity and intel info on Iraq, but that's not what Libby testified to, based on current court filings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Yep
Thanks for the notes Garbo 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
39. So he didn't say that is was OK to leak Plame's identity?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. Nobody's challenging Libby's truthfulness
they're all defending Bush's "right" to leak whatever he wants . . . so it has to be true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Mr. Fitzgerald is. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Fitzy's questioning Libby's testimony
that the info came from Bush/Cheney himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. You're right. Libby still lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'm in the same boat. To me it looks as if Chimpy can just blame it
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 02:41 PM by bush_is_wacko
all on Cheney who looks like he's ready to go anyway. His interest in this presidency is Halliburton anyway. Unless Cheney gets jail time he hasn't lost much of anything.

This reminds me of the Iran-contra crap. This guy blames this guy and this guy says this guy said it was okay. In the end one guy ends up as the scapegoat and the rest of their names are a footnote in the minds of the American public.

While there is certainly an impeachable offense that has been committed here, there were several during the Iran-contra era as well. I still have a heard time believing Reagan was so out of it at that time he knew about none of it. And look what happened next, Bush (the father) who was implicated in the whole deal was elected to office!

American History is starting to disgust me :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Absolutely NOTHING Is Going To Happen On This One
EITHER! Decks have been cleared, The Idiot sez he has the right and if the past is ANY indication... well screwed AGAIN!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. No it's
significant. Witness all the news stations headlining with it.

It is impossible to explain why only the favorable portion of the NIE was authorized for declassifying and not the two agencies who said they disagreed.

It doesn't matter if he has the right, it's what was leaked. This is just another dot that has been connected and he's starting to lose every shred of credibility.

His approval rating is down further again today. Lowest ever. Things are looking fine my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. I HOPE You're Prediction Is An Actuality! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC