Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Didn't Bush say he'd fire anyone who leaked classified info?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:09 PM
Original message
Didn't Bush say he'd fire anyone who leaked classified info?
Edited on Thu Apr-06-06 05:12 PM by Generic Other
Anyone remember that quote?

Yup, here it is:

USA Today 2005
President will fire anyone who committed crime in CIA leak
By Richard Benedetto and Mark Memmott, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — President Bush said Monday that he would fire anyone in his administration who had leaked the identity of a CIA officer — if the leak broke the law.
"If someone committed a crime," Bush said speaking to reporters after a meeting with visiting Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, "they will no longer work in my administration."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-18-bush-rove_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is a good one!!
Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. i think he actually just said "i'd like to know"
and merely implied that he'd take the leaker to task.

but i could be misundermembering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep Helen brought that point up
No Comment was the answer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh I just discovered the loophole
He said he'd fire anyone who "worked." I don't think that term applies to Bush.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes! he has the pleasure of firing himself! Email that to Keith!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. The loophole is "if the leak broke the law."
"If someone committed a crime."

All they'll do is claim that what they did was legal, then Bush has got his out. Everything they do is legal, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Bush had said he would fire anyone who leaked (without crime)
First, Bush said he would fire anyone involved. Then, a year later, he said he would fire anyone "who committed a crime."

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush appeared to backtrack Monday from his 2004 pledge to fire anyone involved in leaking the name of CIA operative Valerie Plame.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/07/18/cia.leak/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. See? He was busy making loopholes for himself and his buddies.
Sort of like his ever-shifting reasons for invading Iraq. Whatever suits him at the time is what he'll say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. So he's known the truth for two years without speaking up
How much money spent? How much of Fitzgerald's time? Hasn't he then committed the crime of obstruction of justice by not coming forward earlier to admit this fact?

When did he de-classify the info? And why? How is this any different than the kind of crap Nixon pulled? It shows intention both to commit and then cover up a crime, if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. And we've got the entire 2006 campaign season to enjoy this show! LOL
I say let the CIRCUS continue and onward into the glorious 20s (Bush poll rating, that is).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. You have asked the key salient questions. Good work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. Then why didn't he say it TWO YEARS AGO???
Why the wild goose chase since he friggin' KNEW he was the leaker!!!

If we stay on message, that ain't gonna fly. "He's been looking for himself for two years!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. this means Bush has lied the entire time after everything connected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. "If someone committed a crime"
Of course, no crime was committed, because Bush is King and can do whatever he wants, including leaking classified info and lying about it.

Nothing to see here, move along....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. He may have the right to leak but not to cover up (that's the crime)
We need merely point to Ken Starr for a legal precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. We also need a Congress controlled by Democrats.
Otherwise, nothing will be done and Bush will go on his merry little way, thumbing his now at the law. No one can and will hold him accountable right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. he "declassified" the doc.. hence.. no crime
no crime, no problem..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. it's the cover-up
Shouldn't he have informed Fitzgerald that he had authorized the leak? Didn't Fitzgerald already question Bush early in this investigation? Is Bush now covering for Karl Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. Declassifying for the purpose of leaking
Without approval from the CIA?? No, that isn't going to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bush's riddle answer will be that he declassified the information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Cover -up. cover-up. cover-up
A day late and a dollar short. Bush on the spot 9/12, Bush on top Katrina within a week of the levy breaking, now he recalls he authorized the leaks but neglected to say so in time to stop a two year investigation into the leak...

I think I will be calling him "Tardy" Bush from now on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. How about calling him "Inmate Bush"? Doesn't that sound good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I'm good with that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. the loophole is, he never did any work in the first place
if he'd said, "they will no longer take vacations," he'd be in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. That's what I was afraid of
"work" is the loophole. Damn. The man can honestly say he's never done it. And who could deny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. He also said that
"they'd be taken care of.." of course people don't listen to the right wingers a lot of the time, when they AREN'T LYING, of COURSE they'll be "taken care of"..

Limos, lawyers, money, ho's, the works.. all they have to do to get these things are lie and keep their mouth shut.

I wish Bush was stupid enough to fire HIMSELF accidentally.. maybe something for WhiteHouse.org or The Onion :)


The guy that Cheney SHOT IN THE FACE was taken care of, most probably by the shooting itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Weasel words!! How come some one who is as inarticulate as he is
always knows how to parse his words after the fact? Fork-tongued reptilian monster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. You dance with your lizard leather boots on
And pull the strings
That change the faces of men
~Ballrooms of Mars - T-Rex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Bush Fire Thyself
Flame on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
giant_robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. It might not be a bad option for him.
He can "fire" himself, pack up the pig farm, haul ass for Saudi Arabia and crash on cousin Bandar's couch until the heat is off. (Which, I hope, is never!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius 2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yes he did and it sounds like a great idea to me. This traitorous
bastard and his evil co-conspirator need to be locked away from decent people forever. All the time,money and reputations pissed away when he knew he and Cheney were the sources all along. Now they make up some bogus executive order cover, from what I have heard the info would need to be vetted by the originator,in this case the head of the CIA, to be declassified.Now tell me a CIA manager would intentionally leak the name of an operative and I will tell you that is one dude who should be shit canned in a NY minute and then tried for treason.

Even if they can spin this to make it seem as if it is legal, let us not forget the time and money wasted as well as the fact that any operative seen with Valerie has been compromised and any cases they were working on have been compromised as well.

How many agents have died because of this, how has this affected national security, what were the various agents in conact with Valerie working on? These are the questions Congress should be demanding!!!!

Fucking traitor!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
30. Dear Mr. Chimperor...
Go Fire Yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
33. If not in criminal court, can the Wilsons go after him in Civil Court?
Didn't Paula Jones pave the way? Seems like Bush has all but pleaded guilty to this crime. Valerie Plame can hit him with pain and suffering, reckless endangerment, workplace privacy laws, employment relations laws, civil service rules and regulations, etc. If we can't put him in jail, can we bankrupt the bastard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC