|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:13 AM Original message |
This morning on NPR - an epiphany |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. I know there were some that were left on answering machines and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 04:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. A company called Ptech (now GoAgile) may be able to help you on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kitkat65 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 06:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Are we talking the same Ptech associated with Singh (is that her name?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 08:02 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. You must mean Indira Singh. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
2. Not to get all MIHOPy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 08:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. You're not being MIHOPy at all. You're just not deluding yourself with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 08:24 AM Response to Reply #12 |
24. can someone explain MIHOPy for us congenitally slow people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bigmack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 09:47 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Made it happen on purpose.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeunderdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 09:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
26. There is a likelihood that the government used new voice-replicating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Slit Skirt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
3. good observation .....bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. They've done so much for so long they take it for granted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quakerfriend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. Great point. On a slightly different note, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Atbove a certain speed it is not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 09:25 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. The Pentagon plane would never have reached high altitude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
6. The evidence seems to point to right after they took office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
7. Ditto! "What the hell is going on here?" ....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
8. This is an interesting question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
10. It's been going on since Bush** took office!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
11. Deleted message |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 09:20 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. It's possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Government (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Another 9-11 Myth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Twist_U_Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
15. Drip,drip,drip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
16. Some of them were 911 calls (not 9/11) and they always record those. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
17. You cell phone calls are never secure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
18. I mentioned this issue to several conservative friends downtown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
21. NSA's echelon system has been operative for 10 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
25. Would they have used the airplane phones? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 09:50 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. No they were expressly described as cell phone calls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 10:28 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. I didn't think cell phones worked up there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 10:33 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Yes they do. Personal experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC