Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We are gonna need to purge our Military someday soon.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:45 PM
Original message
We are gonna need to purge our Military someday soon.
I'm sorry but there are too many that are involved in this Argentina style military junta,
who are in collusion with the military industrial complex, the neocons and anti democratic ideals.

But remember to support our troops


end rant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChristianLibrul Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good luck
Pentagon generals have whored for defense contractors since well before WWII. There's a long line of folks waiting for a turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. military is going to take care it itself--just like in Latin America
where military got sick of being the bad guys.

One way to keep this from happening again is to weld shut the door from the Pentagon to corporate America.

No one who works in procurement or war planning should ever be able to profit from those after they leave the service. If they do, the same thing should happen to them that should happen to senators, the president and vice president: they should at minimum lose their pensions and benefits for life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Agreed, that would be a nice bill to pass in a Democratic congress
I would like to see that but I'm an optimist and also a realist that can only hope we may see that in our children's future.

After Abu Ghraib prison I knew that something was terrible wrong, then Guantánamo Bay, then even more stories of
Iraq, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. It is imperative to put these strict rules in place.
Who is it going to hurt?

4-stars with a very healthy pension and otherwise great job outlooks.

The corporate influence $$$$$$$$ on top generals is too much.

Generals also wield political power so this is doubly imperative.

NO top officers go to work for defense contractors. NONE! <<< Should be the rule.

I think there is a one-year wait now or something that is totally ineffective.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. And the secret services, and the government
and the banking system. And i probably forgot some.
It's a heck of a job.



THE SMEDLEY BUTLER SOCIETY
http://warisaracket.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Unfortunately, you can put that in the fat chance catagory.
The politicians have been the lapdogs of the military since WWII. They're all on the payroll of the same corporat\ions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Vietnam troops rebelled (new DOCUMENTARY FILM)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. conscripts rebelled
not bloody-minded volunteers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That is not necessarily fair to the people serving.
To many it was an avenue to viable career skills training, entry to college, or even a hefty chunk of cash. To characterize all these people's motivation as "bloody" is overly harsh and factually inaccurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Maybe public service such as being a teacher, social worker etc.
Should count,
the GI bill was given to WWII vets for not the reason it is given today,
it was given for their service in WWII

I am talking about the top down to commission career officers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. "hefty chunk of cash"
That's also why people rob liquor stores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. only a small minority is actually blood-thirsty and they quit to
become contractors to avoid that pesky Geneva Convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. so..are you going to start with my kid?
don't forget-the troops aren't the ones who got us into this fucking mess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. No, of course not, but you have to admit something is wrong from the top

who blame a few "bad apples".



I said support our troops and meant it, this not an attack on enlisted men.
the foot solider, is not who I am talking about,
no reflection about them. I always loved your photo.

I buried three of my high school friends, some drafted, some enlisted at Arlington Cemetery.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebaby3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Your OP sure sounded like it was bashing the troops. I was in the process
of typing a different reply when I saw this and decided to change my reply which was not at all nice.

I'll just say this...

You will not have to worry about purging my husband out because he retires in September.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. This is some of the crap I am talking about
"After Neil Santorello heard the news that his son, a tank commander, had been killed in Iraq, from the officer in his living room, he walked out his front door and removed the American flag from its pole. Then, in tears, he tore down the yellow ribbons from his tree.

Rather than see it as the act of a man unmoored by the death of his 24-year-old son, the officer, an Army major, confronted Mr. Santorello, saying, "Don't be disrespectful," Mr. Santorello recalled. Then, the officer, whose job it is to inform families of their loss, quickly disappeared without offering any comfort.

Later, the Santorellos heard a piece of crushing but inaccurate news: They would not be allowed to look inside their son's coffin. First Lt. Neil Santorello, of Verona, Pa., had been killed by an improvised bomb. His body, the family was told, was unviewable.

...snip...

Scores of families whose loved ones have died fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan have gone head-to-head with a casualty system that, in their experience, has failed to compassionately and competently guide them through the harrowing process that begins after a soldier's death."

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/07/us/07notify.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Just came out in LBNs: here

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2213187
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I agree with you,then-but that is bureaucracy-and we need to purge
the bureaucrats running this piece of shit that was our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Exactly.
Someone is teaching/ordering them to behave in that manner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Picture of the father...
Oh, and by the way the" bureaucrats "that did this to the family were military officers in uniform.



A photograph on a memorial card shows Mr. Youngblood
holding Hunter before departing for Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Not everyone in uniform is a soldier...some have sold their souls
bless that brave soldier's family.He represents the reason I have fought so hard for veteran's and survivor's rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Well bless you for that!
I weep for that young man & 2339 others in our uniform alone that I know of, hundreds of thousands of innocents whose lives cannot be marginalized as somehow being of less value because they were Iraqi. All the others, whatever their "Nationality". And the maimed, the disfigured, the mentally haunted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC