Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why wont they admit to Global Warming?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:14 PM
Original message
Why wont they admit to Global Warming?
Does anyone know why these asshats refuse to admit to Global Warming? Really I tried to talk to these idiots and all I get is a blank look and a shrug right before they walk away. Have you ever talked to anyone that has given you a credible explanation about why they refuse to admit this fact? Grr- sorry I had to vent people are just so damn frustrating at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, the administration won't because they're owned by the oil companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. True thats the given.
But I am talking about john and jane public who dont own stock in oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:23 PM
Original message
Because they'd probably have to pay more for fuel and other things
(at least for a time) while we start to explore alternate energy sources.

It's the ostrich mentality. If you don't see or hear it, it doesn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. there is none so blind as he who will not see
nothing is important enough to risk altering the status quo. they know in their hearts that it is probably true, just as they know that the gas is going to run out. their culpability (which is the same as any other amurkan's) is just to horrible to face.

once a crisis hits, though, they'll sure squeak plenty loud about how someone else should have done something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's the old meme: "It isn't happening."
The new meme is that it's happening but it's a natural earth process that happens on a cyclical basis.

Which is BS.

Geez, don't you read FReepers? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. They have admitted it in a limited way.
Polar Bears (as an example) are going to be gone from the wild shockingly soon, so they had to say something.

The place they are lying is suggesting that it's a natural phenomena instead of an man-made fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. It would hurt profits (costly environmental mitigation measures)...
and require increased government regulations... plus, according to their views, it doesn't matter anyway since the Rapture is coming soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. A couple reasons
First of all, they are in bed with the oil companies. Secondly, the second coming is going to hit us any day now. So who cares what happens to the earth? It doesn't make any difference, since all the fundie RWers believe they will be in heaven anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. What George WIll says:
"Suppose the Earth is warming and suppose the warming is caused by human activity. Are we sure there will be proportionate benefits from whatever climate change can be purchased at the cost of slowing economic growth and spending trillions? Are we sure the consequences of climate change -- remember, a thick sheet of ice once covered the Midwest -- must be bad? "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. his fallacy: adaptation will 'slow economic growth'
it will redirect it away from current models into an unknown future.

perhaps we would even question our assumptions regarding what growth should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. yeah
There are some ecological economists who make sense - I hope they get some traction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Some of the fundies believe the world is in "end times" and it doesn't
make any difference. Others perceive people concerned about the environment as hippes....don't want anything to do with them. And then of course, the greedy bastards that don't want to spend a penny on something that won't give them an immediate return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I guess they musta missed the part ...
that we are supposed to be stewards of the earth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. It drives me nuts, too, especially since the end result is
an uninhabitable planet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. They can't make money on it. Give them a way to profit and they will n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. $$$$
Those that got lots intend to keep on going like all is A-OK cuz the status quo keeps $$$ coming their way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. They own all the beachfront property in Nevada and Arizona?
Do something about global warming and that land stays worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. How many conservative businesspeople do you know?
My wife's old boss was very conservative. We'd get into any discussion, and I'd blast him with a hundred facts, and he'd shake his head with a condescending smirk and tell me that liberals where always saying that stuff. He had no logical reasoning faculties anywhere in him. Never asked questions. Just went forward, full steam ahead. When Bush was elected, I told him his company would be gone within a year, because Bush's policies favored big business. About eight months later he sold his company to a larger competitor for a lot of money. I told him, "See, your company no longer exists, because you sold it to a larger company." Same condescending head shake. "But I made a lot of money off it," he said. "I made more money by selling it than I could have by owning it." I tried to explain that that was exactly what I predicted would happen, that the company would be less profitable under a Republican system. All he saw was the money he got for the company, not the golden eggs the company would have kept laying if the playing field had not been tipped to big business.

No reasoning ability. Only the ability to see immediate results, and the lack of concern with anything long-term.

Republicanism isn't an ideology, it's a brain malfunction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Hey I like your last line.
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 05:18 PM by DanCa
Republicanism isn't an ideology it's a brain malfunction. If you put that on a shirt I'd buy it in a heart beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh, some admit that it's happening --
hey just won't accept that we have anything to do with it. It's all sun cycles, and dust in space and natural phenomena. And some of it may be.

But the evidence is clear that the burning of fossil fuels is exacerbating the problem, at the very least. And that gets the oil companies involved.

And therin lies the rub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. They are owned by Big Oil's lobby, the American Petroleum Institute
Here's the American Petroleum Institute's

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. Because that would prove Al Gore was right (heaven forbid)!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC