Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep Conyers: " ... the President is ... Leaker in Chief"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:19 PM
Original message
Rep Conyers: " ... the President is ... Leaker in Chief"
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 04:20 PM by understandinglife
My friend, radio talk show host Stephanie Miller, is fond of saying that I must be getting carpal tunnel syndrome from all of the letters I have been sending to the President. Unfortunately, when I go to my mailbox every day, it is empty. More than 130 Members of Congress and more than 500,000 of the American people are still waiting for a response to questions we asked the President about the Downing Street Minutes.

Now we learn that the President of the United States is the Leaker in Chief via disgraced former White House aide Scooter Libby. Mr. Libby testified that the President authorized him to leak classified information about Iraq's alleged nuclear ambitions. He testified before a grand jury that "the Vice President later advised him that the President had authorized to disclose the relevant portions of the ." All of this was part of a concerted effort to destroy Administration critic Ambassador Joe Wilson.

This means the distortions and cherry picking of intelligence came from the top. This means the smears were officially sanctioned at the highest levels of government. This means that a President who claimed to abhor the leaking of classified information really meant that leaking classified information is a horrible and treasonous act when it hurts his credibility and the case for war, but a patriotic act when it helps the case for war.

<clip>

More at the Link including a copy of Congressman Conyers' latest letter to Bu$h:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-conyers/memo-to-sunday-talkers-p_b_18685.html


No ambiguity here ...


The President of the United States willfully violated National Security to cover-up his willful launch of a war of aggression.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Text of letter:


Dear Mr. President:

We write with respect to the troubling revelation that you authorized I. Lewis Libby, the Vice President's former Chief of Staff, to attempt to discredit a critic of your Administration through the selective leaking of classified information. The information pertained to Iraq's alleged, and now soundly disproved, efforts to acquire nuclear weapons. This leak is similar in pattern to the leak of the identity of a CIA officer whose husband discredited your assertions about Iraq's nuclear ambitions. We ask that, once and for all, you publicly admit the extent of your role in authorizing the selective leaking of information to discredit your critics and detail what other leaks you have authorized that are relevant to the war in Iraq.

As you are aware, at least two senior Administration officials disclosed the fact that Valerie Plame Wilson was an undercover CIA officer. The Justice Department, through Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, began investigating the source of the leak of this highly-classified information. In October 2005, a federal grand jury indicted Mr. Libby for obstruction of justice, perjury, and false statements pertaining to his involvement in the leak.

In the course of this investigation, according to the Justice Department, Mr. Libby testified that you authorized him to leak classified information about Iraq's alleged nuclear ambitions. He testified before a grand jury that "the Vice President later advised him that the President had authorized to disclose the relevant portions of the ."1 What makes Mr. Libby's testimony especially troubling is that you have repeatedly implied that you have not had any role in the leaking of classified information.

In fact, you have stated several times that leaking classified information is a serious crime and that perpetrators should be brought to justice. These statements were in connection with the Valerie Plame Wilson leak2 and the disclosure of the NSA spying program3. Mr. Libby's sworn testimony, however, indicates that you have been personally involved in trying to undermine the credibility of those who question your claims about Iraq; as part of that effort, you have permitted the leak of classified information on at least one occasion.

Moreover, even Presidents are not outside of the law in this area. It is apparent that, at a minimum, you are bound by your own executive orders and the executive orders of your predecessors governing the declassification of certain information. It is not clear what those procedures are and whether you have followed them.

For these reasons, we ask that you immediately disclose not only the extent of your role in authorizing the disclosure of information to discredit critics of your Administration but also any other information related to the war that you have leaked and the rationale for each such leak.

Sincerely,

John Conyers Jr., Jerrold Nadler, Sherrod Brown, Jim McDermott, Tom Udall, Tammy Baldwin, Gary Ackerman, Steven Rothman, Betty McCollum, Ellen Tauscher, Robert Wexler, Maurice Hinchey, David Scott, Michael Honda, Anthony Weiner



1. Government's Response to Defendant's Third Motion to Compel Discovery at 23, United States v. Libby (D.D.C. 2006) (Cr. No. 05-394).

2. "There are too many leaks of classified information in Washington. There's leaks at the executive branch; there's leaks in the legislative branch. There's just too many leaks. And if there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if the person has violated law, the person will be taken care of. And so I welcome the investigation. I -- I'm absolutely confident that the Justice Department will do a very good job. There's a special division of career Justice Department officials who are tasked with doing this kind of work; they have done this kind of work before in Washington this year. I have told our administration, people in my administration to be fully cooperative. I want to know the truth. If anybody has got any information inside our administration or outside our administration, it would be helpful if they came forward with the information so we can find out whether or not these allegations are true and get on about the business." The President, President Discusses Job Creation With Business Leaders (Sept. 30, 2003) (press briefing). You reiterated the point just one month later:

"I'd like to know if somebody in my White House did leak sensitive information. As you know, I've been outspoken on leaks. And whether they happened in the White House, or happened in the administration, or happened on Capitol Hill, it is a -- they can be very damaging." The President, President Holds Press Conference (Oct. 28, 2003).

3. "But it is a shameful act by somebody who has got secrets of the United States government and feels like they need to disclose them publicly." The President, Press Conference of the President (Dec. 19, 2005).

Link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-conyers/memo-to-sunday-talkers-p_b_18685.html



If You're pro-Bu$h, You're Anti-America

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Far too wordy for the Idiot in Chief to comprehend....most likely tossed
in the round file....

Bush has done us a favor in the sense he has destroyed the Pub Party...They can no longer be trusted..it was they that installed the bugger into office.... and now they are scurring around like the rats they are.

All the Pubs are TRAITORs to AMERICA...they have caused Great Harm to us and the World...all by selecting an idiot to lead us...

In the old days....they wouldn't even let him touch the spears and weapons of an Army...much less lead the troops into battle...

Bush would be feeding the pigs with the rest of the dolts..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Space Cowboy
He's a sneaker, he's a leaker . . .
. . . he's a midnight tweeker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I heard Jane Harmon say "Leaker-In-Chief" this morning...
Obviously a talking point for our side. Let's get spreading it!

:hi: ul!

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes, she did and it's quoted by the BBC, among others:
Congresswoman Jane Harman, the senior Democrat on the House's intelligence committee, said: "If the disclosure is true, it's breathtaking. The president is revealed as the leaker-in-chief."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4887612.stm


:hi: CW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I heard it on CNN Headline News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. I liked harry reeds reply this morning, instead of the buck stops here
the leak starts here. I am starting to get tired of some of our dem leaders for not taking advantage of the moment, we are talking about the future of this country and all.:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does George W. Bush Leak?
That "Depends"...

(maximum absorbency required)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Was he wearing that on "Mission Accomplished"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Probably... He was full of it then too.
Besides, given how "leakey" he's been, he really does need some diapers. (though I suspect he'd just play with them/wear them on his head)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Christy Hardin Smith: "... why ask for an attribution of "former Hill ...
... staffer" when the President had "declassified" the portions of the NIE that Libby was disclosing to her? Was he still unsure of the legality? Was he protecting the President’s plausible deniability in the court of public opinion — or the Veep’s? Or were they trying to do the media bait and switch again — having Libby plant the item, and then having another official substantiate it later? (There was a reference yesterday to Woodward having been used like a Kleenex — you have to wonder if the whole of the Washington press corps isn’t feeling this way in light of all these revelations, don’t you?)

And why, if the "declassification" process was so legal and on the up and up did the President, the Veep and Libby keep that fact from the rest of the staff — including cabinet level officials who were later asked to re-declassify the very same sections of the NIE? (See p. 24 for who was in the know.) Can you say CYA? I sure as hell can.

On p. 24, Fitzgerald refers to Libby being directed by Dick Cheney to brief reporters in place of his then-press secretary, Cathie Martin. Fitz says that "this is relevant to show the importance that defendant and his boss placed on the conversation concerning which he later testified." Meaning it’s awfully hard to think that Scooter forgot about this trifling matter of the political smackdown of Joe Wilson that week when he was tasked with the importance of the political smackdown of Joe Wilson that week by the Veep himself. (I’m just saying…) And because this was done in the context of and using the pretext of discussions about the NIE, there is no way to present the facts of Libby’s conduct without one and the other — they were intertwined, and Fitzgerald knows it.

<clip>

Much more in # 3 in the Hey Team Libby series that former prosecutor Smith has posted at firedoglake:

http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/hey-team-libbypart-iii

And, the links for # 1 and # 2 are, respectively:

http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/hey-team-libby-part-i

http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/07/hey-team-libbypart-ii


It's those little details that tell you just how comprehensive their obstruction of justice and abuse of power, apart from all the other laws they've violated, are. Little details, like if the Preznit has declassified it, why worry about whom it's attributed and, even more so, why try to hang it on a mystery former "Hill staffer."

Arrogance + power persistently catapults one into stupidville.


If You're pro-Bush, You're Anti-America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Visualize "Chairman Conyers".
:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nice Plug For Steph Miller
I heard her show is beating O'Reilly's in the ratings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sgt Major Myers: "This nation has been betrayed by the President of ...
... the United States, his administration and the Republican Leadership of the Senate and Congress. They have been betrayed and the cost of that betrayal is absolutely inconceivable, disgusting and sad and stretches from the banks of the Tigress River to the Gulf shores of Mississippi and Louisiana touching the lives of Iraqis, Americans, and countless others.

Read the full text of Of Irony, Sacrifice and Betrayal at:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/4/7/174556/1810


A terse, powerful summation and something every American should be reading this weekend.


George W. Bush willfully violated National Security to cover-up his willful launch of a war of aggression and illegal occupation of Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. He is tireless on behalf of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC