Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intelligence leak timeline under scrutiny

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 08:47 AM
Original message
Intelligence leak timeline under scrutiny
Date data released in question
The White House faced a barrage of questions Friday over the timing of President Bush's decision to declassify intelligence that was then leaked to the press by Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff. In a tense briefing, White House spokesman Scott McClellan was asked repeatedly to explain his statement from three years ago that portions of a prewar intelligence document on Iraq were declassified on July 18, 2003.

Ten days earlier, Cheney's top aide, I. Lewis Libby, had leaked snippets of intelligence from the document to New York Times reporter Judith Miller to rebut allegations by Bush administration critic Joseph Wilson, Libby told prosecutors, according to documents revealed this week. Libby, Cheney's former chief of staff, said he had passed the information to Miller after being told to do so by Cheney, who advised Libby that Bush had authorized it, said a court filing by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald. McClellan told reporters July 18, 2003, that the material being released on Iraq ''was officially declassified today.'' On Friday, McClellan interpreted his words to mean that is when the material was ''officially released.''

(snip)
Plame's CIA employment was disclosed by conservative columnist Robert Novak eight days after her husband, Wilson, accused the Bush administration of manipulating prewar intelligence to exaggerate the Iraqi threat from weapons of mass destruction. The declassification issue marks the second time in the CIA leak probe that the White House's previous public statements have been called into question. After checking with Libby and presidential adviser Karl Rove, McClellan said in 2003 that neither aide was involved in the leak of the CIA identity of Wilson's wife. Rove remains under investigation in the leak probe.

(snip)
John Podesta, a former chief of staff in the Clinton White House, said, ''Scott McClellan's credibility isn't just in tatters. It is more like confetti.'' Administration critics said Bush's actions were a misuse of the declassification process. Bush's ''selective declassification of highly sensitive intelligence for political purposes is wrong,'' said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco.

more
http://www.kentucky.com/mld/montereyherald/news/nation/14295881.htm?source=rss&channel=montereyherald_nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can't wait to see Helen Thomas rip Scotty Toad a new one during the
next press briefing. :D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. An honorable man "rebuts" criticism in the same public venue it was dealt
Edited on Sat Apr-08-06 08:57 AM by librechik
not secretly, and with a vicious, asymmetrical strike at the critic's family!

a strike that coincidentally wipes out the very program most threatening to the selling of the Iraq war?


the incidental distractions the Pukkkes are fastening on to defend against this are ridiculous. If they would look up from the constant fellation for a mo, they maight notice a few things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. mclellans credibility? scotty is NOBODY. he is the mouthpiece of bush.
the PRESIDENTS propaganda mouthpiece. if it comes from scotty it is a bush statement. officially.

there is no disconnect here. he is not stating his OPINIONS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC