Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The deception Bush can't spin---By Joe Conason

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 02:26 PM
Original message
The deception Bush can't spin---By Joe Conason
The deception Bush can't spin
Libby's testimony shows that Bush disclosed national secrets for political gain -- and makes Bush's statements about finding the leaker ludicrous.

By Joe Conason


April 7, 2006 | If we are to believe the grand jury testimony of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby -- as reported by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in court papers (PDF) -- then the president of the United States has been deceiving the country ever since the CIA leaks investigation began in 2003.

Compared with other deceptions that George W. Bush has perpetrated in the years since he promised to restore honor and integrity to the Oval Office, this one cannot be spun away as a misunderstanding, a "misunderestimate" or a mistake. From the moment that the Justice Department opened its probe of the disclosure of Valerie Plame Wilson's covert CIA identity to the press, Bush insisted that he wanted to find and punish the culprits, especially if any of them were among his White House staff. He claimed to consider the leaking of classified information to be a matter of the utmost seriousness.

And he let his press secretary insist repeatedly that the White House had absolutely no idea how this terrible thing had happened.

We have come a long way since then, of course. We have learned that at least two of the highest-ranking White House staff members leaked Plame's identity to reporters as part of a broader effort to discredit her husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, for daring to draw attention to White House misuse of intelligence on Iraq in an Op-Ed in the New York Times. We know that Libby, then the vice president's chief of staff and national security advisor, and Karl Rove, the White House deputy chief of staff, both participated in that effort -- and that both have lied repeatedly about their roles in the scheme.

more (short ad) at:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2006/04/07/libby_case/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's all acknowledge the fact that our president is a criminal...
he must be impeached, indicted, tried, and, if appropriate, punished. How shameful to have a president who deserves serious jail time, if not a visit to the Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Now all we need is a Congress with enough integrity to do it.
And as long as Republicans control Congress, that won't be the case. The future of our country rides on the mid-term elections. Democrats must control Congress to bring this more criminal administration to justice. How far do you think the Republicans are willing to go to prevent that from happening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. they can't spin this one? Maybe, but they sure are trying.
One question on my mind is: if he declassified the memo, why didn't he stop the CIA investigation into the leak? By the same token, why did he call it a "criminal matter" whe he declassified it?? Because he never did. He never thought he would be forced to pretend that he did declassify it.

He is a lying sack of liquid crap, as Stephanie Miller would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Remember, wasn't Ashcroft attorney general then?
Edited on Sat Apr-08-06 03:06 PM by lyonn
They thought they had all the bases covered. So, how did they screw up so bad as to appoint Fitz to the job of prosecuting for the CIA's charges of outing an agent. They got sloppy one to many times, we hope.

Edit: Right, why not announce the info was declassified instead of the charade he went through saying this is a terrible act by "someone", let's go get em'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Or maybe Ashcroft had a pang of conscience and recused
himself, which they hadn't anticipated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Right you are. It's a combination of incompetence and hubris. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who else has heard this
next to last paragraph.....

snippity do

Or he could confirm the rumors that have been circulating about his plans to resign in the near future, and leave these irritating problems to someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The word has been that SS is being fired (Josh Bolton - the guy
who replaced Andy Card), but I don't believe that. I think this is a Rove leak. I think SS has probably already given his RESIGNATION. They don't want another person leaving on his own. Make it look like Josh Bolton called for replacement.

Oh what a terrible web we weave............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC