Neocon Internet Debating Tactics

[rpgamerd00d]

1. If someone makes a claim, its automatically false unless its supportive of Bush/the conservative view point.
2. If someone backs up a claim with links to a biased website source, the source is a moonbat site with no credibility, unless its rightwing, then its totally credible and factual.
3. If someone backs up a claim with links to an "official MSM" source, the reporter who wrote the article is a moonbat communist that hates Bush.
4. If someone backs up a claim with links to an "official MSM" source and the reporter is credible, their "undisclosed source" or other person quoted in the article is a moonbat communist that hates Bush.
5. If someone backs up a claim with links to an "official MSM" source and the reporter is credible and their "undisclosed source" or other person quoted in the article is credible, they will deny that the article is of any importance, refer you to all the other times "us stupid Dems thought you had Bush and came up empty", and then post pictures of "toast" and "legs" with :rofl: emoticons.
6. When a Republican is found guilty of a crime, its either the Dems fault,or "that guy was a RINO and scumbag anyway, who cares."

[eleny]

1. This reads like a Tom Tomorrow comic...

Good observations! :headbang: