Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Old News but: Iraq Findings Leaked by Cheney's Aide Were Disputed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 10:16 PM
Original message
Old News but: Iraq Findings Leaked by Cheney's Aide Were Disputed
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/09/washington/09leak.html?hp&ex=1144555200&en=ae8daa5efe411a3c&ei=5094&partner=homepage

WASHINGTON, April 8 — When President Bush authorized Vice President Dick Cheney's top aide to reveal previously classified intelligence to a reporter about Saddam Hussein's efforts to obtain uranium, as the aide has testified, that information was already being discredited by several senior officials in the administration, interviews show.

A review of the records and interviews conducted since that crucial period in June and July of 2003 also show that what the aide, I. Lewis Libby Jr., said he was authorized to portray to reporters as a "key judgment" by the intelligence community had in fact been given much less prominence in an earlier intelligence report.

Mr. Libby said he drew on that report, the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, when he spoke with the reporter. Records and interviews show that the key judgment's lack of prominence in the report was a reflection of doubts about its reliability.

The new account of the interactions among Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney and Mr. Libby was spelled out last week in a court filing by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case. It adds considerably to a picture of an administration in some disarray as the failure to discover illicit weapons in Iraq had undermined the central rationale for the American invasion in March 2003.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Older news: IAEA had publicly debunked the Niger claims before the war.
Edited on Sat Apr-08-06 10:29 PM by Garbo 2004
Also, the aluminum tubes claims were also publicly debunked, as I recall, prior to the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. True. But this involves the leaks.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, but I don't see the leaks were particularly helpful to their cause.
And of course they didn't leak the contrary stuff.

Even Judy's account of what Libby told her in regards to their Iraq WMD claims was essentially "same old, same old." Judy already probably had more confidential Administration info regarding Iraq WMD than Libby did, LOL. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yet Still They Got Away With It
un-fucking believable - fake news, fake documents, fake uranium, fake meetings, fake drawings -

Shame, shame, shame on those who voted to authorize IWR based on a big pile of shit lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. These press stories are reminding people of a dishonest WH (if nothing
else).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree! It refreshes their memories!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC