Editorial: Yanks revolt against London auto fee
Mayor responds with a bit of "argy bargy."
Bear with us as we try to understand Republicans. In St. Paul, they consider the state cigarette tax a fee, hoping not to be seen as tax raisers; in London, they consider the traffic congestion fee a tax, hoping not to pay it. Why does the word "two-faced" come to mind?
Actually, London's mayor preferred "chiseling little crook" to describe the American ambassador, a buddy of President Bush who, when he took his post last July, stopped paying the congestion surcharge for embassy cars. The city charges about $14 a day for each car entering central London in order to discourage auto gridlock and promote public transit. Ambassador Robert Tuttle contends the fees are taxes that diplomats shouldn't have to pay, citing immunities granted by the Vienna Convention. Mayor Ken Livingstone says the fees are more like tolls, and that British diplomats routinely pay tolls on American roads and bridges.
Livingstone has a point; the fees have made the city more livable, and the Yanks should pay their share. Including fines, the embassy owes more than a quarter-million dollars. Livingstone, in turn, owes a more civil tone, although a tart tongue has long been his trademark, and his comments are amusing, especially about the ambassador's ironic background as a big California auto dealer. Although Germany and several other countries also decline to pay the congestion fee, the mayor takes special delight at poking the Americans. The colonists, it seems, have never liked British taxes, whether on tea in Boston or driving in London.
http://www.startribune.com/561/story/358589.html