|
And the WH non-response, very peculiar.
It seems to me, this may be a desperate attempt of a sinking presidency to garner some sympathy support and creating a wonderful '06 talking point. Bill Kristol is now spinning Fitzgerald's investigation as an "attempt to harm the president and vice president".
Talking point #1: "The Democrats just want to win back Congress so they can Impeach Bush"
I know it is popular here, but I don't think it is wise to make it a prominent feature of your platform for '06. Energy security(gas prices,biofuels), national security (immigration,borders and ports), and Iraq should be our top three, IMO. Impeachment is always a possibility once Conyers, Waxman, and others can get Chairmanships.
I really do question the authenticity of this, if Libby were compelled to testify that it was Bush, it would throw another wrench into Fitzgerald's investigation. Even if Libby were convicted of multiple counts of perjury, he would be pardoned, especially if this strategy works and saves their majority in the House/Senate and thus their asses.
Who leaked Plame's name? Libby could be telling the truth, but why should we believe him?
|