Froomkin: "Is the president telling the truth? Is he a hypocrite?"

[understandinglife]

Under what circumstances did he take the country to war, and how far was he willing to go to cover them up? Can the president be trusted to distinguish what's truly in the national interest, as compared to what's simply in his political interest?

What's clearly needed now is full disclosure, on the record, starting at the very top.

More of Some Explaining To Do by Dan Froomkin at the link:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2005/04/11/LI2005041100879.html

Yep.

And, maybe WaPo senior management, if they're interested in being something other than a Bush propaganda spigot, should place Dan Froomkin in charge of their editorial board -- for starters.


George W. Bush willfully violated National Security to cover-up his willful launch of a war of aggression and illegal occupation of Iraq.

[saltpoint]

1. No and Yes.

[BrklynLiberal]

4. Ditto.

[Patsy Stone]

2. Lucy!

You got some 'splainin' to do!



K&R for you, and Dan. :hi:

[understandinglife]

6. I like that!! Thank you.

:hi:


Peace.

[GreenPartyVoter]

3. Wandering off-topic, does anyone else think Dan is kinda cute?

[Gabi Hayes]

5. whuhhh? anyone else think he may not be long for his job, with

that sort of double plus NOT good talk?

they must've already reduced his chocolate ration